The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The salivary microbiota as a diagnostic indicator of oral cancer: A descriptive, non-randomized study of cancer-free and oral squamous cell carcinoma subjects
Open accessAbstract
Background: The purpose of the present investigation was to determine if the salivary counts of 40 common oral bacteria in subjects with an oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) lesion would differ from those found in cancer-free (OSCC-free) controls. Methods: Unstimulated saliva samples were collected from 229 OSCC-free and 45 OSCC subjects and evaluated for their content of 40 common oral bacteria using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization. DNA counts per ml saliva were determined for each species, averaged across subjects in the 2 subject groups, and significance of differences between groups determined using the Mann-Whitney test and adjusted for multiple comparisons. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in detection of OSCC by levels of salivary organisms were computed and comparisons made separately between a non-matched group of 45 OSCC subjects and 229 controls and a group of 45 OSCC subjects and 45 controls matched by age, gender and smoking history. Results: Counts of 3 of the 40 species tested,Capnocytophaga gingivalis,Prevotella melaninogenica and Streptococcus mitis, were elevated in the saliva of individuals with OSCC (p < 0.001). When tested as diagnostic markers the 3 species were found to predict 80% of cancer cases (sensitivity) while excluding 83% of controls (specificity) in the non-matched group. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in the matched group were 80% and 82% respectively. Conclusion: High salivary counts of C. gingivalis,P. melaninogenica and S. mitis may be diagnostic indicators of OSCC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oral squamous cell carcinomas: state of the field and emerging directions
Tan, Y., Wang, Z., Xu, M., Li, B., Huang, Z., Qin, S., Nice, E. C., Tang, J., & Huang, C. (2023) · International Journal of Oral Science · doi:10.1038/s41368-023-00249-w · Cited by 831
Variations of oral microbiota are associated with pancreatic diseases including pancreatic cancer
Farrell, J. J., Zhang, L., Zhou, H., Chia, D., Elashoff, D., Akin, D., Paster, B. J., Joshipura, K., & Wong, D. T. W. (2012) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300784 · Cited by 662
Salivary Biomarkers: Toward Future Clinical and Diagnostic Utilities
Yoshizawa, J. M., Schafer, C. A., Schafer, J. J., Farrell, J. J., Paster, B. J., & Wong, D. T. W. (2013) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00021-13 · Cited by 656
The Microbiota of Breast Tissue and Its Association with Breast Cancer
Urbaniak, C., Gloor, G. B., Brackstone, M., Scott, L., Tangney, M., & Reid, G. (2016) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01235-16 · Cited by 625
Tumour immunity: effector response to tumour and role of the microenvironment
Mantovani, A., Romero, P., Palucka, A. K., & Marincola, F. M. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60241-x · Cited by 537
Metadata
- Authors
- Mager, D., Haffajee, A., Devlin, P., Norris, C., Posner, M., & Goodson, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Translational Medicine
- Published
- 2005-07-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-27
- ISSN
- 1479-5876 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156536854
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The salivary microbiota as a diagnostic indicator of oral cancer: A descriptive, non-randomized study of cancer-free and oral squamous cell carcinoma subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1479-5876-3-27
- The paper
- Mager, D., Haffajee, A., Devlin, P., Norris, C., Posner, M., & Goodson, J. (2005). The salivary microbiota as a diagnostic indicator of oral cancer: A descriptive, non-randomized study of cancer-free and oral squamous cell carcinoma subjects. Journal of Translational Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-3-27
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.