Cited by 178Coffee research and impactsGenetics and Physical PerformancePharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The influence of a CYP1A2 polymorphism on the ergogenic effects of caffeine

Open access
Womack, Christopher J, Saunders, Michael J, Bechtel, Marta K, Bolton, David J, Martin, Michael, Luden, Nicholas D, Dunham, Wade, Hancock, Melyssa·2012·Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although caffeine supplementation improves performance, the ergogenic effect is variable. The cause(s) of this variability are unknown. A (C/A) single nucleotide polymorphism at intron 1 of the cytochrome P450 (CYP1A2) gene influences caffeine metabolism and clinical outcomes from caffeine ingestion. The purpose of this study was to determine if this polymorphism influences the ergogenic effect of caffeine supplementation. METHODS: Thirty-five trained male cyclists (age = 25.0 ± 7.3 yrs, height = 178.2 ± 8.8 cm, weight = 74.3 ± 8.8 kg, VO2max = 59.35 ± 9.72 ml·kg-1·min-1) participated in two computer-simulated 40-kilometer time trials on a cycle ergometer. Each test was performed one hour following ingestion of 6 mg·kg-1 of anhydrous caffeine or a placebo administered in double-blind fashion. DNA was obtained from whole blood samples and genotyped using restriction fragment length polymorphism-polymerase chain reaction. Participants were classified as AA homozygotes (N = 16) or C allele carriers (N = 19). The effects of treatment (caffeine, placebo) and the treatment × genotype interaction were assessed using Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance. RESULTS: Caffeine supplementation reduced 40 kilometer time by a greater (p < 0.05) magnitude in AA homozygotes (4.9%; caffeine = 72.4 ± 4.2 min, placebo = 76.1 ± 5.8 min) as compared to C allele carriers (1.8%; caffeine = 70.9 ± 4.3 min, placebo = 72.2 ± 4.2 min). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that individuals homozygous for the A allele of this polymorphism may have a larger ergogenic effect following caffeine ingestion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1550-2783-9-7

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Average (mean ± SE) 40 kilometer time for the caffeine and placebo treatments for both groups. *-Significantly (p < 0.05) larger decrease in 40 K time than the C allele carriers.
Figure 1 Average (mean ± SE) 40 kilometer time for the caffeine and placebo treatments for both groups. *-Significantly (p < 0.05) larger decrease in 40 K time than the C allele carriers.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 40-km time in both the placebo condition (y-axis) and the caffeinated condition (x-axis) for both AA homozygotes and C allele carriers. The line of identity is plotted and reflects no difference between the two trials. Data points above the line of identity reflect an improved 40-km time in the caffeinated condition.
Figure 2 40-km time in both the placebo condition (y-axis) and the caffeinated condition (x-axis) for both AA homozygotes and C allele carriers. The line of identity is plotted and reflects no difference between the two trials. Data points above the line of identity reflect an improved 40-km time in the caffeinated condition.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hallstrom H, 2010, NutrMetab, 7, 12

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Womack, C. J., Saunders, M. J., Bechtel, M. K., Bolton, D. J., Martin, M., Luden, N. D., Dunham, W., & Hancock, M.
Affiliations
James Madison University (US)
Corresponding author
Womack, Christopher J
Venue
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Published
2012-02-06
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
7-7
ISSN
1550-2783 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130611622
Cited by
178
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • James Madison University
  • University of Toronto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
caffeine, CYP1A2, single nucleotide polymorphisms, caffeine metabolism, ergogenic aids, genetic variation, time trial performance, cyclists, genotype × treatment interaction, caffeine supplementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review