The DOI matches its Crossref record.
LTE and IEEE 802.11p for vehicular networking: a performance evaluation
Open accessAbstract
Various wireless communication systems exist, which enable a wide range of applications and use cases in the vehicular environment. These applications can be grouped into three types, namely, road safety, traffic efficiency, and infotainment, each with its own set of functional and performance requirements. In pursuance of assisting drivers to travel safely and comfortably, several of these requirements have to be met simultaneously. While the coexistence of multiple radio access technologies brings immense opportunities towards meeting most of the vehicular networking application requirements, it is equally important and challenging to identify the strength and weaknesses of each technology and understand which technology is more suitable for the given networking scenario. In this paper, we evaluate two of the most viable communication standards, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.11p and long-term evolution (LTE) by 3rd Generation Partnership Project for vehicular networking. A detailed performance evaluation study of the standards is given for a variety of parameter settings such as beacon transmission frequency, vehicle density, and vehicle average speed. Both standards are compared in terms of delay, reliability, scalability, and mobility support in the context of various application requirements. Furthermore, through extensive simulation-based study, we validated the effectiveness of both standards to handle different application requirements and share insight for further research directions. The results indicate that IEEE 802.11p offers acceptable performance for sparse network topologies with limited mobility support. On the other hand, LTE meets most of the application requirements in terms of reliability, scalability, and mobility support; however, it is challenging to obtain stringent delay requirements in the presence of higher cellular network traffic load.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Boban, M., Kousaridas, A., Manolakis, K., Eichinger, J., & Xu, W. (2018) · IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine · doi:10.1109/mvt.2017.2777259 · Cited by 282
Vehicular Communications: A Physical Layer Perspective
Liang, L., Peng, H., Li, G. Y., & Shen, X. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2017.2750903 · Cited by 267
Jeon, Y., Kuk, S., & Kim, H. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18124388 · Cited by 59
Use cases, requirements, and design considerations for 5G V2X
Boban, M., Kousaridas, A., Manolakis, K., Eichinger, J., & Xu, W. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.01754 · Cited by 52
A Survey on Secure Computation Based on Homomorphic Encryption in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks
Sun, X., Yu, F. R., Zhang, P., Xie, W., & Peng, X. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20154253 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Hameed Mir, Z., & Filali, F.
- Venue
- EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
- Published
- 2014-05-30
- Volume
- 2014
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1687-1472 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-1499
- OpenAlex
- W2170662583
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LTE and IEEE 802.11p for vehicular networking: a performance evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1687-1499-2014-89
- The paper
- Hameed Mir, Z., & Filali, F. (2014). LTE and IEEE 802.11p for vehicular networking: a performance evaluation. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1499-2014-89
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.