The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Open access (OA) is a revolutionary way of providing access to the scholarly journal literature made possible by the Internet. The primary aim of this study was to measure the volume of scientific articles published in full immediate OA journals from 2000 to 2011, while observing longitudinal internal shifts in the structure of OA publishing concerning revenue models, publisher types and relative distribution among scientific disciplines. The secondary aim was to measure the share of OA articles of all journal articles, including articles made OA by publishers with a delay and individual author-paid OA articles in subscription journals (hybrid OA), as these subsets of OA publishing have mostly been ignored in previous studies. METHODS: Stratified random sampling of journals in the Directory of Open Access Journals (n = 787) was performed. The annual publication volumes spanning 2000 to 2011 were retrieved from major publication indexes and through manual data collection. RESULTS: An estimated 340,000 articles were published by 6,713 full immediate OA journals during 2011. OA journals requiring article-processing charges have become increasingly common, publishing 166,700 articles in 2011 (49% of all OA articles). This growth is related to the growth of commercial publishers, who, despite only a marginal presence a decade ago, have grown to become key actors on the OA scene, responsible for 120,000 of the articles published in 2011. Publication volume has grown within all major scientific disciplines, however, biomedicine has seen a particularly rapid 16-fold growth between 2000 (7,400 articles) and 2011 (120,900 articles). Over the past decade, OA journal publishing has steadily increased its relative share of all scholarly journal articles by about 1% annually. Approximately 17% of the 1.66 million articles published during 2011 and indexed in the most comprehensive article-level index of scholarly articles (Scopus) are available OA through journal publishers, most articles immediately (12%) but some within 12 months of publication (5%). CONCLUSIONS: OA journal publishing is disrupting the dominant subscription-based model of scientific publishing, having rapidly grown in relative annual share of published journal articles during the last decade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,322
Stanton, B. F., & Rogers, E. M. (1963) · Journal of Farm Economics · doi:10.2307/1235767 · Cited by 6,675
The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009
Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., & Hedlund, T. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020961 · Cited by 755
Self-citationMechanisms regulating melanogenesis*
Videira, I. F. D. S., Moura, D. F. L., & Magina, S. (2013) · Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia · doi:10.1590/s0365-05962013000100009 · Cited by 677
Suber, P. (2012) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9286.001.0001 · Cited by 623
Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009
Björk, B.-C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., & Guðnason, G. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011273 · Cited by 526
Self-citationThe access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-5607 · Cited by 497
Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact
Björk, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2012) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-73 · Cited by 478
Self-citationDo open access articles have greater citation impact?A critical review of the literature
CRAIG, I., PLUME, A., MCVEIGH, M., PRINGLE, J., & AMIN, M. (2007) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.04.001 · Cited by 373
A study of open access journals using article processing charges
Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22673 · Cited by 356
Self-citation
Cited by
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles
Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.4375 · Cited by 1,223
Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics
Shen, C., & Björk, B.-C. (2015) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2 · Cited by 819
Self-citationThe Academic, Economic and Societal Impacts of Open Access: An Evidence-Based Review
Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, C. H. J. (2016) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.8460.3 · Cited by 560
The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals
Björk, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2013) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001 · Cited by 432
Self-citationOpen access: The true cost of science publishing
Van Noorden, R. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/495426a · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Authors
- Laakso, M., & Björk, B.-C.
- Venue
- BMC Medicine
- Published
- 2012-10-22
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 124-124
- ISSN
- 1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115339903
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 78.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1741-7015-10-124
- The paper
- Laakso, M., & Björk, B.-C. (2012). Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-124
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.