The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The Internet has recently made possible the free global availability of scientific journal articles. Open Access (OA) can occur either via OA scientific journals, or via authors posting manuscripts of articles published in subscription journals in open web repositories. So far there have been few systematic studies showing how big the extent of OA is, in particular studies covering all fields of science. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The proportion of peer reviewed scholarly journal articles, which are available openly in full text on the web, was studied using a random sample of 1837 titles and a web search engine. Of articles published in 2008, 8.5% were freely available at the publishers' sites. For an additional 11.9% free manuscript versions could be found using search engines, making the overall OA percentage 20.4%. Chemistry (13%) had the lowest overall share of OA, Earth Sciences (33%) the highest. In medicine, biochemistry and chemistry publishing in OA journals was more common. In all other fields author-posted manuscript copies dominated the picture. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results show that OA already has a significant positive impact on the availability of the scientific journal literature and that there are big differences between scientific disciplines in the uptake. Due to the lack of awareness of OA-publishing among scientists in most fields outside physics, the results should be of general interest to all scholars. The results should also interest academic publishers, who need to take into account OA in their business strategies and copyright policies, as well as research funders, who like the NIH are starting to require OA availability of results from research projects they fund. The method and search tools developed also offer a good basis for more in-depth studies as well as longitudinal studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access
Harnad, S. R., Brody, T., Vallières, F., Carr, L. A., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H., & Hilf, E. R. (2004) · Serials Review · doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013 · Cited by 529
The access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-5607 · Cited by 497
Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::aid-asi1047>3.0.co;2-t · Cited by 369
Hajjem, C., Harnad, S. R., & Gingras, Y. (2006) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cs/0606079 · Cited by 352
Open Access and Global Participation in Science
Evans, J. A., & Reimer, J. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154562 · Cited by 258
The effect of use and access on citations
Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Henneken, E., & Murray, S. S. (2005) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.010 · Cited by 232
Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers,,,,
Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2000) · Cited by 230
The citation advantage of open‐access articles
Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., & Rowland, F. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20898 · Cited by 230
Scientific Journal Publishing: Yearly Volume and Open Access Availability.
Björk, B., Roos, A., & Lauri, M. (2009) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 189
Self-citationEconomic Implications of Alternative Scholarly Publishing Models Exploring the costs and benefits
Houghton, J., Rasmussen, B., Sheehan, P. J., Oppenheim, C., Morris, A., Creaser, C., Greenwood, H. E., Summers, M. A., & Gourlay, A. (2009) · Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) · Cited by 167
Cited by
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles
Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.4375 · Cited by 1,223
Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research
Chan, A.-W., Song, F., Vickers, A., Jefferson, T., Dickersin, K., Gøtzsche, P. C., Krumholz, H. M., Ghersi, D., & van der Worp, H. B. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62296-5 · Cited by 887
The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009
Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., & Hedlund, T. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020961 · Cited by 755
Self-citationAnatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure
Laakso, M., & Björk, B.-C. (2012) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-124 · Cited by 364
Self-citationSpear, L. P. (2011) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.08.001 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Björk, B.-C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., & Guðnason, G.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-06-23
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e11273
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140880926
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 104.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0011273
- The paper
- Björk, B.-C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., & Guðnason, G. (2010). Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.