Evaluation of a multiple ecological level child obesity prevention program: Switch What you Do, View, and Chew
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Schools are the most frequent target for intervention programs aimed at preventing child obesity; however, the overall effectiveness of these programs has been limited. It has therefore been recommended that interventions target multiple ecological levels (community, family, school and individual) to have greater success in changing risk behaviors for obesity. This study examined the immediate and short-term, sustained effects of the Switch program, which targeted three behaviors (decreasing children's screen time, increasing fruit and vegetable consumption, and increasing physical activity) at three ecological levels (the family, school, and community). METHODS: Participants were 1,323 children and their parents from 10 schools in two states. Schools were matched and randomly assigned to treatment and control. Measures of the key behaviors and body mass index were collected at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention. RESULTS: The effect sizes of the differences between treatment and control groups ranged between small (Cohen's d = 0.15 for body mass index at 6 months post-intervention) to large (1.38; parent report of screen time at 6 months post-intervention), controlling for baseline levels. There was a significant difference in parent-reported screen time at post-intervention in the experimental group, and this effect was maintained at 6 months post-intervention (a difference of about 2 hours/week). The experimental group also showed a significant increase in parent-reported fruit and vegetable consumption while child-reported fruit and vegetable consumption was marginally significant. At the 6-month follow-up, parent-reported screen time was significantly lower, and parent and child-reported fruit and vegetable consumption was significantly increased. There were no significant effects on pedometer measures of physical activity or body mass index in the experimental group. The intervention effects were moderated by child sex (for fruit and vegetable consumption, physical activity, and weight status), family involvement (for fruit and vegetable consumption), and child body mass index (for screen time). The perception of change among the experimental group was generally positive with 23% to 62% indicating positive changes in behaviors. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the Switch program yielded small-to-modest treatment effects for promoting children's fruit and vegetable consumption and minimizing screen time. The Switch program offers promise for use in youth obesity prevention.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For Gentile 2009, the review judged random sequence generation as unclear risk because the randomization process was not reported.
“Unclear risk Comment: randomization process not reported”
From School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 (2013) · cites this paper as Gentile 2009
For Gentile 2009, the review judged allocation concealment as low risk because the criterion was not applicable: all participants were allocated at one point in time following recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
From School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 (2013) · cites this paper as Gentile 2009
For Gentile 2009, the review judged incomplete outcome data as high risk because incomplete outcome data were not adequately addressed.
“High risk Comment: incomplete outcome data was not adequately addressed”
From School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 (2013) · cites this paper as Gentile 2009
For Gentile 2009, the review judged confounders as controlled (low risk) because all relevant confounders were taken into account.
“Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders taken into account”
From School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 (2013) · cites this paper as Gentile 2009
For Gentile 2009, the review judged data collection methods as low risk because data collection tools were reported to be valid and reliable, although methods could have been stronger for body mass index.
“Low risk Comment: data collection tools reported to be valid and reliable although methods could have been stronger for body mass index”
From School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 (2013) · cites this paper as Gentile 2009
For Gentile 2009, the review judged selective reporting as low risk because all outcomes identified a priori were reported on.
“Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
From School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 (2013) · cites this paper as Gentile 2009
For Gentile 2009, the review judged blinding as unclear risk because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“Unclear risk Comment: no information given, likely not done”
From School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 (2013) · cites this paper as Gentile 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 204
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Baranowski T Mendlein J Resnicow K Frank E Cullen KW Baranowski J Physical activity and nutrition in children and youth: An overview of obesity prevention Prev Med 2000 31 S1 S10 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x · DOI · Paper page
- Rosenthal R How are we doing in soft psychology? Am Psychol 1990 45 775 777 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322 · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Gentile, D. A., Welk, G., Eisenmann, J. C., Reimer, R. A., Walsh, D. A., Russell, D. W., Callahan, R., Walsh, M., Strickland, S., & Fritz, K.
- Affiliations
- Iowa State University (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Des Moines University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gentile, Douglas A
- Venue
- BMC Medicine
- Published
- 2009-09-18
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-49
- ISSN
- 1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2758893
- OpenAlex
- W2126992424
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 12.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
- Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Cargill
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- childhood obesity prevention, school-based intervention, screen time, fruit and vegetable intake, physical activity, body mass index, family involvement, parent-reported behavior, pedometer-measured activity
- MeSH terms
- Child, Female, Health Promotion, Health Services Research, Humans, Male, Obesity, Parents, Schools, Health Behavior, Body Mass Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review