Cited by 204Obesity, Physical Activity, DietPhysical Activity and HealthSchool Health and Nursing Education

Evaluation of a multiple ecological level child obesity prevention program: Switch What you Do, View, and Chew

Open access
Gentile, Douglas A, Welk, Greg, Eisenmann, Joey C, Reimer, Rachel A, Walsh, David A, Russell, Daniel W, Callahan, Randi, Walsh, Monica +2 more·2009·BMC Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Schools are the most frequent target for intervention programs aimed at preventing child obesity; however, the overall effectiveness of these programs has been limited. It has therefore been recommended that interventions target multiple ecological levels (community, family, school and individual) to have greater success in changing risk behaviors for obesity. This study examined the immediate and short-term, sustained effects of the Switch program, which targeted three behaviors (decreasing children's screen time, increasing fruit and vegetable consumption, and increasing physical activity) at three ecological levels (the family, school, and community). METHODS: Participants were 1,323 children and their parents from 10 schools in two states. Schools were matched and randomly assigned to treatment and control. Measures of the key behaviors and body mass index were collected at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention. RESULTS: The effect sizes of the differences between treatment and control groups ranged between small (Cohen's d = 0.15 for body mass index at 6 months post-intervention) to large (1.38; parent report of screen time at 6 months post-intervention), controlling for baseline levels. There was a significant difference in parent-reported screen time at post-intervention in the experimental group, and this effect was maintained at 6 months post-intervention (a difference of about 2 hours/week). The experimental group also showed a significant increase in parent-reported fruit and vegetable consumption while child-reported fruit and vegetable consumption was marginally significant. At the 6-month follow-up, parent-reported screen time was significantly lower, and parent and child-reported fruit and vegetable consumption was significantly increased. There were no significant effects on pedometer measures of physical activity or body mass index in the experimental group. The intervention effects were moderated by child sex (for fruit and vegetable consumption, physical activity, and weight status), family involvement (for fruit and vegetable consumption), and child body mass index (for screen time). The perception of change among the experimental group was generally positive with 23% to 62% indicating positive changes in behaviors. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the Switch program yielded small-to-modest treatment effects for promoting children's fruit and vegetable consumption and minimizing screen time. The Switch program offers promise for use in youth obesity prevention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1741-7015-7-49

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 204

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Baranowski T Mendlein J Resnicow K Frank E Cullen KW Baranowski J Physical activity and nutrition in children and youth: An overview of obesity prevention Prev Med 2000 31 S1 S10 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Rosenthal R How are we doing in soft psychology? Am Psychol 1990 45 775 777 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Gentile, D. A., Welk, G., Eisenmann, J. C., Reimer, R. A., Walsh, D. A., Russell, D. W., Callahan, R., Walsh, M., Strickland, S., & Fritz, K.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Des Moines University (US)
Corresponding author
Gentile, Douglas A
Venue
BMC Medicine
Published
2009-09-18
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
49-49
ISSN
1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126992424
Cited by
204
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cargill
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
childhood obesity prevention, school-based intervention, screen time, fruit and vegetable intake, physical activity, body mass index, family involvement, parent-reported behavior, pedometer-measured activity
MeSH terms
Child, Female, Health Promotion, Health Services Research, Humans, Male, Obesity, Parents, Schools, Health Behavior, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review