The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions
Open accessAbstract
Bone regeneration is a complex, well-orchestrated physiological process of bone formation, which can be seen during normal fracture healing, and is involved in continuous remodelling throughout adult life. However, there are complex clinical conditions in which bone regeneration is required in large quantity, such as for skeletal reconstruction of large bone defects created by trauma, infection, tumour resection and skeletal abnormalities, or cases in which the regenerative process is compromised, including avascular necrosis, atrophic non-unions and osteoporosis. Currently, there is a plethora of different strategies to augment the impaired or 'insufficient' bone-regeneration process, including the 'gold standard' autologous bone graft, free fibula vascularised graft, allograft implantation, and use of growth factors, osteoconductive scaffolds, osteoprogenitor cells and distraction osteogenesis. Improved 'local' strategies in terms of tissue engineering and gene therapy, or even 'systemic' enhancement of bone repair, are under intense investigation, in an effort to overcome the limitations of the current methods, to produce bone-graft substitutes with biomechanical properties that are as identical to normal bone as possible, to accelerate the overall regeneration process, or even to address systemic conditions, such as skeletal disorders and osteoporosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Giannoudis, P. V., Dinopoulos, H., & Tsiridis, E. (2005) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.029 · Cited by 2,078
Self-citationKim, S.-J., Shin, Y.-W., Yang, K.-H., Kim, S.-B., Yoo, M.-J., Han, S.-K., Im, S.-A., Won, Y.-D., Sung, Y.-B., Jeon, T.-S., et al. (2009) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-20 · Cited by 111
Cited by
Normal Bone Anatomy and Physiology
Clarke, B. (2008) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.04151206 · Cited by 2,192
An Overview of Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) Acid (PLGA)-Based Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering
Gentile, P., Chiono, V., Carmagnola, I., & Hatton, P. (2014) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms15033640 · Cited by 1,593
Zhai, M., Zhu, Y., Yang, M., & Mao, C. (2020) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202001334 · Cited by 277
The Influence of Aging on the Regenerative Potential of Human Adipose Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Marędziak, M., Marycz, K., Tomaszewski, K. A., Kornicka, K., & Henry, B. M. (2016) · Stem Cells International · doi:10.1155/2016/2152435 · Cited by 225
Zhang, H., Mao, X., Du, Z., Jiang, W., Han, X., Zhao, D., Han, D., & Li, Q. (2016) · Science and Technology of Advanced Materials · doi:10.1080/14686996.2016.1145532 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Dimitriou, R., Jones, E., McGonagle, D., & Giannoudis, P. V.
- Venue
- BMC Medicine
- Published
- 2011-05-31
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-66
- ISSN
- 1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004337957
- Cited by
- 2,003
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1741-7015-9-66
- The paper
- Dimitriou, R., Jones, E., McGonagle, D., & Giannoudis, P. V. (2011). Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions. BMC Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-66
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.