The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of diabetes on tuberculosis treatment outcomes: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Background: Multiple studies of tuberculosis treatment have indicated that patients with diabetes mellitus may experience poor outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantitatively summarize evidence for the impact of diabetes on tuberculosis outcomes. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the World Health Organization Regional Indexes from 1 January 1980 to 31 December 2010 and references of relevant articles for reports of observational studies that included people with diabetes treated for tuberculosis. We reviewed the full text of 742 papers and included 33 studies of which 9 reported culture conversion at two to three months, 12 reported the combined outcome of failure and death, 23 reported death, 4 reported death adjusted for age and other potential confounding factors, 5 reported relapse, and 4 reported drug resistant recurrent tuberculosis. Results: Diabetes is associated with an increased risk of failure and death during tuberculosis treatment. Patients with diabetes have a risk ratio (RR) for the combined outcome of failure and death of 1.69 (95% CI, 1.36 to 2.12). The RR of death during tuberculosis treatment among the 23 unadjusted studies is 1.89 (95% CI, 1.52 to 2.36), and this increased to an effect estimate of 4.95 (95% CI, 2.69 to 9.10) among the 4 studies that adjusted for age and other potential confounding factors. Diabetes is also associated with an increased risk of relapse (RR, 3.89; 95% CI, 2.43 to 6.23). We did not find evidence for an increased risk of tuberculosis recurrence with drug resistant strains among people with diabetes. The studies assessing sputum culture conversion after two to three months of tuberculosis therapy were heterogeneous with relative risks that ranged from 0.79 to 3.25. Conclusions: Diabetes increases the risk of failure and death combined, death, and relapse among patients with tuberculosis. This study highlights a need for increased attention to treatment of tuberculosis in people with diabetes, which may include testing for suspected diabetes, improved glucose control, and increased clinical and therapeutic monitoring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
The combination of estimates from different experiments
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001666 · Cited by 5,380
Publication and related bias in meta-analysis
Sterne, J. A. C., Gavaghan, D., & Egger, M. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00242-0 · Cited by 2,282
QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1
GREENLAND, S. (1987) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036298 · Cited by 1,644
Jeon, C. Y., & Murray, M. B. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050152 · Cited by 1,486
Self-citation
Cited by
Syndemics and the biosocial conception of health
Singer, M., Bulled, N., Ostrach, B., & Mendenhall, E. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30003-x · Cited by 1,491
Head and neck tuberculosis: Literature review and meta-analysis
Qian, X., Albers, A. E., Nguyen, D. T. M., Dong, Y., Zhang, Y., Schreiber, F., Sinikovic, B., Bi, X., & Graviss, E. A. (2019) · Tuberculosis · doi:10.1016/j.tube.2019.04.014 · Cited by 60
Koesoemadinata, R. C., Kranzer, K., Livia, R., Susilawati, N., Annisa, J., Soetedjo, N. N. M., Ruslami, R., Philipsen, R., van Ginneken, B., Soetikno, R. D., et al. (2018) · The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · doi:10.5588/ijtld.17.0827 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, M. A., Harries, A. D., Jeon, C. Y., Hart, J. E., Kapur, A., Lönnroth, K., Ottmani, S.-E., Goonesekera, S. D., & Murray, M. B.
- Venue
- BMC Medicine
- Published
- 2011-07-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-81
- ISSN
- 1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117777873
- Cited by
- 881
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of diabetes on tuberculosis treatment outcomes: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1741-7015-9-81
- The paper
- Baker, M. A., Harries, A. D., Jeon, C. Y., Hart, J. E., Kapur, A., Lönnroth, K., Ottmani, S.-E., Goonesekera, S. D., & Murray, M. B. (2011). The impact of diabetes on tuberculosis treatment outcomes: A systematic review. BMC Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-81
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.