Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 764

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contrasting disease patterns in seropositive and seronegative neuromyelitis optica: A multicentre study of 175 patients

Open access
Jarius, Sven, Ruprecht, Klemens, Wildemann, Brigitte, Kuempfel, Tania, Ringelstein, Marius, Geis, Christian, Kleiter, Ingo, Kleinschnitz, Christoph, Berthele, Achim, Brettschneider, Johannes, Hellwig, Kerstin, Hemmer, Bernhard, Linker, Ralf A, Lauda, Florian, Mayer, Christoph A, Tumani, Hayrettin, Melms, Arthur, Trebst, Corinna, Stangel, Martin, Marziniak, Martin, Hoffmann, Frank, Schippling, Sven, Faiss, Jürgen H, Neuhaus, Oliver, Ettrich, Barbara, Zentner, Christian, Guthke, Kersten, Hofstadt-van Oy, Ulrich, Reuss, Reinhard, Pellkofer, Hannah, Ziemann, Ulf, Kern, Peter, Wandinger, Klaus P, Then Bergh, Florian, Boettcher, Tobias, Langel, Stefan, Liebetrau, Martin, Rommer, Paulus S, Niehaus, Sabine, Münch, Christoph, Winkelmann, Alexander, Zettl U, Uwe K, Metz, Imke, Veauthier, Christian, Sieb, Jörn P, Wilke, Christian, Hartung, Hans P, Aktas, Orhan, Paul, Friedemann·2012·Journal of Neuroinflammation

Abstract

Background: The diagnostic and pathophysiological relevance of antibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP4-Ab) in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) has been intensively studied. However, little is known so far about the clinical impact of AQP4-Ab seropositivity. Objective: To analyse systematically the clinical and paraclinical features associated with NMO spectrum disorders in Caucasians in a stratified fashion according to the patients' AQP4-Ab serostatus. Methods: Retrospective study of 175 Caucasian patients (AQP4-Ab positive in 78.3%). Results: Seropositive patients were found to be predominantly female (p < 0.0003), to more often have signs of co-existing autoimmunity (p < 0.00001), and to experience more severe clinical attacks. A visual acuity of ≤ 0.1 during acute optic neuritis (ON) attacks was more frequent among seropositives (p < 0.002). Similarly, motor symptoms were more common in seropositive patients, the median Medical Research Council scale (MRC) grade worse, and MRC grades ≤ 2 more frequent, in particular if patients met the 2006 revised criteria (p < 0.005, p < 0.006 and p < 0.01, respectively), the total spinal cord lesion load was higher (p < 0.006), and lesions ≥ 6 vertebral segments as well as entire spinal cord involvement more frequent (p < 0.003 and p < 0.043). By contrast, bilateral ON at onset was more common in seronegatives (p < 0.007), as was simultaneous ON and myelitis (p < 0.001); accordingly, the time to diagnosis of NMO was shorter in the seronegative group (p < 0.029). The course of disease was more often monophasic in seronegatives (p < 0.008). Seropositives and seronegatives did not differ significantly with regard to age at onset, time to relapse, annualized relapse rates, outcome from relapse (complete, partial, no recovery), annualized EDSS increase, mortality rate, supratentorial brain lesions, brainstem lesions, history of carcinoma, frequency of preceding infections, oligoclonal bands, or CSF pleocytosis. Both the time to relapse and the time to diagnosis was longer if the disease started with ON (p < 0.002 and p < 0.013). Motor symptoms or tetraparesis at first myelitis and > 1 myelitis attacks in the first year were identified as possible predictors of a worse outcome. Conclusion: This study provides an overview of the clinical and paraclinical features of NMOSD in Caucasians and demonstrates a number of distinct disease characteristics in seropositive and seronegative patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1742-2094-9-14

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 764

Metadata

Authors
Jarius, S., Ruprecht, K., Wildemann, B., Kuempfel, T., Ringelstein, M., Geis, C., Kleiter, I., Kleinschnitz, C., Berthele, A., Brettschneider, J., Hellwig, K., Hemmer, B., Linker, R. A., Lauda, F., Mayer, C. A., Tumani, H., Melms, A., Trebst, C., Stangel, M., Marziniak, M., Hoffmann, F., Schippling, S., Faiss, J. H., Neuhaus, O., Ettrich, B., Zentner, C., Guthke, K., Hofstadt-van Oy, U., Reuss, R., Pellkofer, H., Ziemann, U., Kern, P., Wandinger, K. P., Then Bergh, F., Boettcher, T., Langel, S., Liebetrau, M., Rommer, P. S., Niehaus, S., Münch, C., Winkelmann, A., Zettl U, U. K., Metz, I., Veauthier, C., Sieb, J. P., Wilke, C., Hartung, H. P., Aktas, O., & Paul, F.
Venue
Journal of Neuroinflammation
Published
2012-01-19
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
14-14
ISSN
1742-2094 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114414511
Cited by
764
References
2
FWCI
34.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contrasting disease patterns in seropositive and seronegative neuromyelitis optica: A multicentre study of 175 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1742-2094-9-14
The paper
Jarius, S., Ruprecht, K., Wildemann, B., Kuempfel, T., Ringelstein, M., Geis, C., Kleiter, I., Kleinschnitz, C., Berthele, A., Brettschneider, J., Hellwig, K., Hemmer, B., Linker, R. A., Lauda, F., Mayer, C. A., Tumani, H., Melms, A., Trebst, C., Stangel, M., . . . Paul, F. (2012). Contrasting disease patterns in seropositive and seronegative neuromyelitis optica: A multicentre study of 175 patients. Journal of Neuroinflammation. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-9-14

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.