The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Definition dependent properties of the cortical silent period in upper-extremity muscles, a methodological study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: To explore if stimulus-response (S-R) characteristics of the silent period (SP) after transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are affected by changing the SP definition and by changing data presentation in healthy individuals. This information would be clinically relevant to predict motor recovery in patients with stroke using stimulus-response curves. METHODS: Different landmarks to define the SP onset and offset were used to construct S-R curves from the biceps brachii (BB) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles in 15 healthy participants using rectified versus non-rectified surface electromyography (EMG). A non-linear mixed model fit to a sigmoid Boltzmann function described the S-R characteristics. Differences between S-R characteristics were compared using paired sample t-tests. The Bonferroni correction was used to adjust for multiple testing. RESULTS: For the BB, no differences in S-R characteristics were observed between different SP onset and offset markers, while there was no influence of data presentation either. For the ADM, no differences were observed between different SP onset markers, whereas both the SP offset marker "the first return of any EMG-activity" and presenting non-rectified data showed lower active motor thresholds and less steep slopes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of different landmarks to define the SP offset as well as data presentation affect SP S-R characteristics of the ADM in healthy individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Cited by
Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton
Collins, S. H., Wiggin, M. B., & Sawicki, G. S. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14288 · Cited by 967
Choi, Y. S., Hsueh, Y.-Y., Koo, J., Yang, Q., Avila, R., Hu, B., Xie, Z., Lee, G., Ning, Z., Liu, C., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19660-6 · Cited by 292
Haptic wearables as sensory replacement, sensory augmentation and trainer – a review
Shull, P. B., & Damian, D. D. (2015) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0055-z · Cited by 245
Fernández-González, P., Carratalá-Tejada, M., Monge-Pereira, E., Collado-Vázquez, S., Sánchez-Herrera Baeza, P., Cuesta-Gómez, A., Oña-Simbaña, E. D., Jardón-Huete, A., Molina-Rueda, F., Balaguer-Bernaldo de Quirós, C., et al. (2019) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-019-0593-x · Cited by 116
A review on research and evaluation methods for investigating self-transcendence
Kitson, A., Chirico, A., Gaggioli, A., & Riecke, B. E. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.547687 · Cited by 76
Frost, C. M., Ursu, D. C., Flattery, S. M., Nedic, A., Hassett, C. A., Moon, J. D., Buchanan, P. J., Brent Gillespie, R., Kung, T. A., Kemp, S. W. P., et al. (2018) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-018-0452-1 · Cited by 68
Lim, B., Choi, B., Roh, C., Lee, J., Kim, Y.-J., & Lee, Y. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-95599-2 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- van Kuijk, A. A., Bakker, C. D., Hendriks, J. C., Geurts, A. C., Stegeman, D. F., & Pasman, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 1743-0003 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145079789
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.