Cited by 379Innovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Biomechanical energy harvesting from human motion: theory, state of the art, design guidelines, and future directions

Open access
Riemer, Raziel, Shapiro, Amir·2011·Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical energy harvesting from human motion presents a promising clean alternative to electrical power supplied by batteries for portable electronic devices and for computerized and motorized prosthetics. We present the theory of energy harvesting from the human body and describe the amount of energy that can be harvested from body heat and from motions of various parts of the body during walking, such as heel strike; ankle, knee, hip, shoulder, and elbow joint motion; and center of mass vertical motion. METHODS: We evaluated major motions performed during walking and identified the amount of work the body expends and the portion of recoverable energy. During walking, there are phases of the motion at the joints where muscles act as brakes and energy is lost to the surroundings. During those phases of motion, the required braking force or torque can be replaced by an electrical generator, allowing energy to be harvested at the cost of only minimal additional effort. The amount of energy that can be harvested was estimated experimentally and from literature data. Recommendations for future directions are made on the basis of our results in combination with a review of state-of-the-art biomechanical energy harvesting devices and energy conversion methods. RESULTS: For a device that uses center of mass motion, the maximum amount of energy that can be harvested is approximately 1 W per kilogram of device weight. For a person weighing 80 kg and walking at approximately 4 km/h, the power generation from the heel strike is approximately 2 W. For a joint-mounted device based on generative braking, the joints generating the most power are the knees (34 W) and the ankles (20 W). CONCLUSIONS: Our theoretical calculations align well with current device performance data. Our results suggest that the most energy can be harvested from the lower limb joints, but to do so efficiently, an innovative and light-weight mechanical design is needed. We also compared the option of carrying batteries to the metabolic cost of harvesting the energy, and examined the advantages of methods for conversion of mechanical energy into electrical energy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1743-0003-8-22

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The main technologies used for harvesting kinetic energy of walking through the floor are based on piezoelectric and electrical induction generators, and electrostatic generators based on EAPs.

    “The main technologies used for harvesting kinetic energy of walking through the floor are based on piezoelectric and electrical induction generators, and electrostatic generators based on electroactive polymers (EAPs) [19].”

    From A review of walking energy harvesting using piezoelectric materials (2017) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Discussion section, “Method for energy conversion,” identifies piezoelectrics, EAPs, and electrical induction generators as the main technologies in current use. But the paper discusses harvesting energy with devices on the body or shoe, including heel-strike devices; it does not establish that these are the main technologies for harvesting walking energy through the floor. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The amount of energy used by the human body per day is 1.07×107 J, equivalent to around 800 AA (2500 mAh) batteries.

    “the amount of energy used by the body per day, is 1.07×107 J [18], an amount equivalent to around 800 AA (2500 mAh) batteries [19].”
  • The technology of EAPs for heel-strike devices has the most power output.

    “according to Riemer and Shapiro [19] the most power output refers to the technology of EAPs for heelstrike devices.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Rowe DM Themoelctric waste heat recovery as renewable energy The International Journal of Innovations in Energy Systems and Power 2006 1 13 23
  2. Shorten RM The energetics of running and running shoes J Biomech 1993 26 41 51 8505351
  3. Jaffe B Cook RW Jaffe H Piezoelectric Ceramics 1989 London: Academic Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riemer, R., & Shapiro, A.
Affiliations
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Corresponding author
Riemer, Raziel
Venue
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published
2011
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
22
ISSN
1743-0003 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127384336
Cited by
379
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
14.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
biomechanical energy harvesting, human movement, walking, heel strike, joint movement, body heat, mechanical-to-electrical energy conversion, portable electronics, metabolic cost
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Ankle, Bioelectric Energy Sources, Biomechanical Phenomena, Elbow Joint, Energy Transfer, Equipment Design, Hot Temperature, Heel, Hip, Humans, Knee, Metabolism, Movement, Shoulder, Walking, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review