The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Splign: algorithms for computing spliced alignments with identification of paralogs
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The computation of accurate alignments of cDNA sequences against a genome is at the foundation of modern genome annotation pipelines. Several factors such as presence of paralogs, small exons, non-consensus splice signals, sequencing errors and polymorphic sites pose recognized difficulties to existing spliced alignment algorithms. RESULTS: We describe a set of algorithms behind a tool called Splign for computing cDNA-to-Genome alignments. The algorithms include a high-performance preliminary alignment, a compartment identification based on a formally defined model of adjacent duplicated regions, and a refined sequence alignment. In a series of tests, Splign has produced more accurate results than other tools commonly used to compute spliced alignments, in a reasonable amount of time. CONCLUSION: Splign's ability to deal with various issues complicating the spliced alignment problem makes it a helpful tool in eukaryotic genome annotation processes and alternative splicing studies. Its performance is enough to align the largest currently available pools of cDNA data such as the human EST set on a moderate-sized computing cluster in a matter of hours. The duplications identification (compartmentization) algorithm can be used independently in other areas such as the study of pseudogenes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
<tt>BLAT</tt> —The <tt>BLAST</tt> -Like Alignment Tool
Kent, W. J. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.229202 · Cited by 8,480
Cited by
De novo assembly of the cattle reference genome with single-molecule sequencing
Rosen, B. D., Bickhart, D. M., Schnabel, R. D., Koren, S., Elsik, C. G., Tseng, E., Rowan, T. N., Low, W. Y., Zimin, A., Couldrey, C., et al. (2020) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giaa021 · Cited by 802
NCBI Reference Sequences: current status, policy and new initiatives
Pruitt, K. D., Tatusova, T., Klimke, W., & Maglott, D. R. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn721 · Cited by 736
“Exon annotation (pseudoexons) for non-transcribed pseudogenes is calculated by aligning the RefSeq transcript from the corresponding functional gene (using Splign) to the pseudogene genomic region and interpreting the alignment result.”
Self-citationFunction of alternative splicing
Kelemen, O., Convertini, P., Zhang, Z., Wen, Y., Shen, M., Falaleeva, M., & Stamm, S. (2013) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2012.07.083 · Cited by 743
A beginner’s guide to eukaryotic genome annotation
Yandell, M., & Ence, D. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3174 · Cited by 588
The complete sequence of a human Y chromosome
Rhie, A., Nurk, S., Cechova, M., Hoyt, S. J., Taylor, D. J., Altemose, N., Hook, P. W., Koren, S., Rautiainen, M., Alexandrov, I. A., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06457-y · Cited by 471
Metadata
- Authors
- Kapustin, Y., Souvorov, A., Tatusova, T., & Lipman, D.
- Venue
- Biology Direct
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20
- ISSN
- 1745-6150 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040770546
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.