The common ancestry of life
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: It is common belief that all cellular life forms on earth have a common origin. This view is supported by the universality of the genetic code and the universal conservation of multiple genes, particularly those that encode key components of the translation system. A remarkable recent study claims to provide a formal, homology independent test of the Universal Common Ancestry hypothesis by comparing the ability of a common-ancestry model and a multiple-ancestry model to predict sequences of universally conserved proteins. RESULTS: We devised a computational experiment on a concatenated alignment of universally conserved proteins which shows that the purported demonstration of the universal common ancestry is a trivial consequence of significant sequence similarity between the analyzed proteins. The nature and origin of this similarity are irrelevant for the prediction of "common ancestry" of by the model-comparison approach. Thus, homology (common origin) of the compared proteins remains an inference from sequence similarity rather than an independent property demonstrated by the likelihood analysis. CONCLUSION: A formal demonstration of the Universal Common Ancestry hypothesis has not been achieved and is unlikely to be feasible in principle. Nevertheless, the evidence in support of this hypothesis provided by comparative genomics is overwhelming.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The model selection tests' preference for universal common ancestry is primarily due to genealogical structure in the protein sequences, not merely high sequence similarity.
“Claim 1: The conclusion of common ancestry is primarily due to genealogical structure in the protein sequences, not mere similarity”
From On universal common ancestry, sequence similarity, and phylogenetic structure: the sins of P-values and the virtues of Bayesian evidence (2011) · cites this paper as [2]
The Abstract’s Results and the Results section say the opposite: the model-comparison result follows from significant sequence similarity, regardless of the sequences’ actual ancestry. The authors generated similar sequences with no common-ancestry signal and report that these still mimicked the test’s result. (LLM, conf=0.95)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe profile model is the true generating model for K&W's simulated data.
“The profile model is the true generating model for the simulated data, and it accounts for the different evolutionary processes at each site in a way the other models cannot, so clearly it should be preferred.”
From On universal common ancestry, sequence similarity, and phylogenetic structure: the sins of P-values and the virtues of Bayesian evidence (2011) · cites this paper as [2]
The various results reported here directly refute the claim that model selection preference for UCA is merely a consequence of high sequence similarity.
“The various results reported here provide a direct refutation of the claim that model selection preference for UCA is merely a consequence of high sequence similarity [2].”
From On universal common ancestry, sequence similarity, and phylogenetic structure: the sins of P-values and the virtues of Bayesian evidence (2011) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A Simple, Fast, and Accurate Algorithm to Estimate Large Phylogenies by Maximum Likelihood
Guindon, S., & Gascuel, O. (2003) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150390235520 · Cited by 16,698 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We then split each alignment into two alignments of 10 sequences each and reconstructed phylogenetic trees for each of the resulting 300 alignments (100 original ones plus two halves for each; Figure 1) using the PhyML program (WAG evolutionary model, alpha parameter of gamma distribution set to 1) [10].”
MethodToward Automatic Reconstruction of a Highly Resolved Tree of Life
Ciccarelli, F. D., Doerks, T., von Mering, C., Creevey, C. J., Snel, B., & Bork, P. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1123061 · Cited by 1,663 · see citing works
Darwinian Evolution Can Follow Only Very Few Mutational Paths to Fitter Proteins
Weinreich, D. M., Delaney, N. F., DePristo, M. A., & Hartl, D. L. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1123539 · Cited by 1,418 · cited 1× · see citing works
“First, the available experimental studies, however limited, suggest that, although only a small fraction of the vast sequence space is open for evolution, the available trajectories are nevertheless numerous, so that evolution is far from deterministic [12,13].”
BackgroundComparative genomics, minimal gene-sets and the last universal common ancestor
Koonin, E. V. (2003) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro751 · Cited by 661 · cited 12× · see citing works
“However, formal demonstration of UCA, independent of the assumption that universally conserved orthologous proteins with highly similar sequences actually originate from common ancestral forms, remains elusive and might not be feasible in principle.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationUniversal trees based on large combined protein sequence data sets
Brown, J. R., Douady, C. J., Italia, M. J., Marshall, W. E., & Stanhope, M. J. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/90129 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Adaptive evolution in the stomach lysozymes of foregut fermenters
Stewart, C.-B., Schilling, J. W., & Wilson, A. C. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/330401a0 · Cited by 374 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Second, the few described cases of actual convergent evolution of similar protein sequences, resulting in independent emergence of the same enzyme specificity, involve only a few key amino acid residues and do not attest to convergent origin of highly similar sequences [14,15].”
BackgroundConvergent evolution: the need to be explicit
Doolittle, R. F. (1994) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/0968-0004(94)90167-8 · Cited by 352 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Doolittle [11], where this is laid out in more detail.”
BackgroundGlansdorff, N., Xu, Y., & Labedan, B. (2008) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/1745-6150-3-29 · Cited by 264 · cited 11× · see citing works
“However, formal demonstration of UCA, independent of the assumption that universally conserved orthologous proteins with highly similar sequences actually originate from common ancestral forms, remains elusive and might not be feasible in principle.”
BackgroundInfluentialAnalogous Enzymes: Independent Inventions in Enzyme EvolutionPreprint
Galperin, M. Y., Walker, D. R., & Koonin, E. V. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.8.779 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Self-citationA formal test of the theory of universal common ancestry
Theobald, D. L. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09014 · Cited by 231 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The likelihood tests of the kind described by Theobald [4] fail to address the problem because they yield results “in support of common ancestry” for any sufficiently similar sequences.”
BackgroundInfluentialSmall-sample tests of episodic adaptive evolution: a case study of primate lysozymes
Zhang, J., Kumar, S., & Nei, M. (1997) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025743 · Cited by 228 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Second, the few described cases of actual convergent evolution of similar protein sequences, resulting in independent emergence of the same enzyme specificity, involve only a few key amino acid residues and do not attest to convergent origin of highly similar sequences [14,15].”
BackgroundConstraints and plasticity in genome and molecular-phenome evolution
Koonin, E. V., & Wolf, Y. I. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2810 · Cited by 163 · cited 1× · see citing works
“First, the available experimental studies, however limited, suggest that, although only a small fraction of the vast sequence space is open for evolution, the available trajectories are nevertheless numerous, so that evolution is far from deterministic [12, 13 ].”
BackgroundSelf-citationOmelchenko, M. V., Galperin, M. Y., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2010) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/1745-6150-5-31 · Cited by 158 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Third, and perhaps most convincing, for about 10% of the known enzyme specificities, isofunctional proteins without detectable sequence or structure similarity have been detected, an indication that multiple, independent solutions to the same biological function are accessible to evolution [16,17].”
BackgroundSelf-citationHansmann, S., & Martin, W. (2000) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-50-4-1655 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Testing the Hypothesis of Common Ancestry
Sober, E. R., & STEEL, M. (2002) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1006/jtbi.2002.3086 · Cited by 79 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Response: We agree and incorporated this point into the revised version of the article: “Following the general information theoretical framework for statistical tests of common ancestry laid out previously by Sober and Steel [6], Theobald reports a likelihood ratio test of the common ancestry hypothesis for genes repr…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCommon ancestry put to the test
Steel, M., & Penny, D. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/465168a · Cited by 30 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In a recent, remarkable Letter to Nature, Theobald applied an information-theoretical approach to offer just that: a formal, homology-independent test for the hypothesis of the common ancestry of the extant cellular life forms [4], a claim that is further reaffirmed in the accompanying News and Views article by Steel…”
BackgroundGargaud, M., Irvine, W. M., Amils, R., Claeys, P., Cleaves, H. J., Gérin, M., Rouan, D., Spohn, T., Tirard, S., & Viso, M. (2023) · Encyclopedia of Astrobiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-65093-6_300735 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolutionary Implications of Horizontal Gene Transfer
Syvanen, M. (2012) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155529 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
The Tree of Life: Metaphor, Model, and Heuristic Device
Mindell, D. P. (2013) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys115 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
“Recent analyses based on phylogenetic model selection of universal common ancestry versus independent origin scenarios have supported universal common ancestry (Theobald 2010, 2011), although these findings are debated (Koonin and Wolf 2010; Yonezawa and Hasegawa 2010; Martins and Posada 2012).”
Life and life only: a radical alternative to life definitionism
Mariscal, C., & Doolittle, W. F. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1852-2 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Mascotti, M. L., Lapadula, W. J., & Ayub, M. J. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132689 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Conservation and Variability of Synaptonemal Complex Proteins in Phylogenesis of Eukaryotes
Grishaeva, T. M., & Bogdanov, Y. F. (2014) · International Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1155/2014/856230 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“It cannot be excluded that protein similarities revealed by using BLAST only cannot provide a basis for phylogenetic inferences [55, 56].”
BackgroundMechanisms of Protein Sequence Divergence and Incompatibility
Wellner, A., Gurevich, M. R., & Tawfik, D. S. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003665 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“PGK can be traced back to LUCA [1,2,16] and its evolutionary rate is extremely slow.”
InfluentialMalik, S. A. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429345753 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Genome Plasticity in Papillomaviruses and De Novo Emergence of E5 Oncogenes
Willemsen, A., Félez-Sánchez, M., & Bravo, I. G. (2019) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evz095 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Theobald, D. L. (2011) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/1745-6150-6-60 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Claim 2: Koonin and Wolf’s simulation corresponds to a common ancestry model K&W assert, without proof, that the profile model used in their simulation produces “phylogenetically unrelated sequences”.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialStatistical evidence for common ancestry: Application to primates: PRIMATE COMMON ANCESTRY
Baum, D. A., Ané, C., Larget, B., Solís-Lemus, C., Ho, L. S. T., Boone, P., Drummond, C. P., Bontrager, M., Hunter, S. J., & Saucier, W. (2016) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12934 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“This test spawned several criticisms and followon discussions (Koonin and Wolf 2010; Steel and Penny 2010; Theobald 2010b, 2011; Yonezawa and Hasegawa 2010, 2012; Martins and Posada 2014).”
The Evolutionary Accessibility of New Enzymes Functions: A Case Study from the Biotin Pathway
Axe, D. D., & Gauger, A. K. (2011) · BIO-Complexity · doi:10.5048/bio-c.2011.1 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Koonin and Wolf have recently exposed the fallacy of taking similarity as proof of homology [64], and yet in our judgment they commit another fallacy.”
BackgroundLooking for the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA)
Koskela, M. M., & Annila, A. (2012) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes3010081 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“However, likelihood analyses may be illusory in proving the hypothesis [9], and at least ambiguous in constructing one tree of life [10].”
BackgroundHuman-chimpanzee alignment: ortholog exponentials and paralog power laws.
Gao, K., & Miller, J. (2014) · PubMed · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2014.08.010 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Within most neutral models of evolution, the probability that a sequence appears in two unrelated genomes decays exponentially with its length, so that sufficiently long sequences common to more than one genome are expected to derive from a common ancestor [15].”
BackgroundTesting for Universal Common Ancestry
Martins, L. D. O., & Posada, D. (2014) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu041 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Koonin and Wolf (2010) simulated alignments lacking phylogenetic structure (site columns came from an independent distribution of amino acid frequencies) and showed that the test would spuriously favor UCA, probably because it was misled by column-wise similarity.”
BackgroundInfinitely long branches and an informal test of common ancestry
Martins, L. D. O., & Posada, D. (2016) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/s13062-016-0120-y · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Space ethics to test directed panspermia
Makukov, M. A., & shCherbak, V. I. (2014) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2014.07.003 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Proving universal common ancestry with similar sequences
Martins, L. D. O., & Posada, D. (2012) · Trends in Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.4081/eb.2012.e5 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Genome plasticity in Papillomaviruses and de novo emergence of E5 oncogenesPreprint
Willemsen, A., Félez-Sánchez, M., & Bravo, I. G. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/337477 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Marsellach, X. (2020) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202012.0506.v1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…ancestor with a formal quantitative testing (Theobald, 2010; Penny et al., 1982), although an agreement about if this can formally be tested has not been achieved (Velasco, 2018; de Oliveira Martins & Posada, 2016; Koskela & Annila, 2012; Koonin & Wolf, 2010; Theobald, 2010; Penny et al., 1982).”
BackgroundStatistical Evidence for Common Ancestry: Testing for Signal in Silent SitesPreprint
Bontrager, M., Larget, B. R., Ané, C., & Baum, D. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/035915 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Given such a loss of information, the codon usage test is not useful for testing the universal common ancestry (UCA) of all life on earth, which is well known asa difficult problem (Theobald 2010; Koonin and Wolf 2010; Yonezawa and Hasegawa 2010, 2012; de Oliveira Martins and Posada 2014).”
MethodStatistical evidence for common ancestry: New tests of universal ancestryPreprint
Larget, B. R., Ané, C., Bontrager, M., Hunter, S., Stenz, N. W. M., & Baum, D. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/036327 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Marsellach, X. (2021) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202012.0506.v2
Marsellach, X. (2021) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202012.0506.v3
Xia, X., & Yang, Q. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374984-0.00215-1
Where Can We Find Approaches to Understanding Evolutionary Processes?
Knoflacher, M. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-69423-7_3
The Polymorphism of Globin and Virus RdRP and Protein SpacePreprint
Lian, D., Lian, J., & Dong, Q. Z. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.08.14.670433
- Authors
- Koonin, E. V., & Wolf, Y. I.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Koonin, Eugene V
- Venue
- Biology Direct
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64
- ISSN
- 1745-6150 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2993666
- OpenAlex
- W2158197263
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Biology Direct (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. National Library of Medicine
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- origin of cellular life, sequence similarity, model comparison, likelihood analysis, homology, genetic code, comparative genomics
- MeSH terms
- Origin of Life, Animals, Biological Evolution, Genetic Code, Humans, Conserved Sequence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review