The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Knowledge and use of medicinal plants by local specialists in an region of Atlantic Forest in the state of Pernambuco (Northeastern Brazil)
Open accessAbstract
The study of local knowledge about natural resources is becoming increasingly important in defining strategies and actions for conservation or recuperation of residual forests. This study therefore sought to: collect information from local populations concerning the use of Atlantic Forest medicinal plants; verify the sources of medicinal plants used; determine the relative importance of the species surveyed, and; calculate the informant consensus factor in relation to medicinal plant use. Data was obtained using semi-structured forms to record the interviewee's personal information and topics related to the medicinal use of specific plants. The material collected represent 125 plants, distributed among 61 botanical families, with little participation of native plants. This study demonstrated that local people tend to agree with each other in terms of the plants used to treat blood-related problems, but cite a much more diverse group of plants to treat problems related to the respiratory and digestive systems – two important categories in studies undertaken in different parts of the world. The local medicinal flora is largely based on plants that are either cultivated or obtained from anthropogenic zones, possibly due to the use and access restrictions of the legally protected neighboring forest. Despite these restrictions, the species with the highest use-value by this community was Pithecellobium cochliocarpum (Gomez) Macb., a native plant of the Atlantic Forest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal plants in Maden (Elazig-Turkey)
Cakilcioglu, U., Khatun, S., Turkoglu, I., & Hayta, S. (2011) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2011.05.046 · Cited by 351
Traditional knowledge on poisonous plants of Udhampur district of Jammu and Kashmir, India
Bhatia, H., Manhas, R. K., Kumar, K., & Magotra, R. (2014) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2013.12.058 · Cited by 46
Sun, J., Bao, W., Zhang, C., Chen, G., & Zhou, Z. (2024) · Toxin Reviews · doi:10.1080/15569543.2024.2369158 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Gazzaneo, L. R. S., de Lucena, R. F. P., & de Albuquerque, U. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-9
- ISSN
- 1746-4269 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148088702
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge and use of medicinal plants by local specialists in an region of Atlantic Forest in the state of Pernambuco (Northeastern Brazil). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1746-4269-1-9
- The paper
- Gazzaneo, L. R. S., de Lucena, R. F. P., & de Albuquerque, U. P. (2005). Knowledge and use of medicinal plants by local specialists in an region of Atlantic Forest in the state of Pernambuco (Northeastern Brazil). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-1-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.