The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants used in the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal): a comparative study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: We compare traditional knowledge and use of wild edible plants in six rural regions of the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula as follows: Campoo, Picos de Europa, Piloña, Sanabria and Caurel in Spain and Parque Natural de Montesinho in Portugal. METHODS: Data on the use of 97 species were collected through informed consent semi-structured interviews with local informants. A semi-quantitative approach was used to document the relative importance of each species and to indicate differences in selection criteria for consuming wild food species in the regions studied. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The most significant species include many wild berries and nuts (e.g. Castanea sativa, Rubus ulmifolius, Fragaria vesca) and the most popular species in each food-category (e.g. fruits or herbs used to prepare liqueurs such as Prunus spinosa, vegetables such as Rumex acetosa, condiments such as Origanum vulgare, or plants used to prepare herbal teas such as Chamaemelum nobile). The most important species in the study area as a whole are consumed at five or all six of the survey sites. CONCLUSION: Social, economic and cultural factors, such as poor communications, fads and direct contact with nature in everyday life should be taken into account in determining why some wild foods and traditional vegetables have been consumed, but others not. They may be even more important than biological factors such as richness and abundance of wild edible flora. Although most are no longer consumed, demand is growing for those regarded as local specialties that reflect regional identity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tardío, J., & Pardo-de-Santayana, M. (2008) · Economic Botany · doi:10.1007/s12231-007-9004-5 · Cited by 1,104
Self-citationPhillips, O., & Gentry, A. H. (1993) · Economic Botany · doi:10.1007/bf02862203 · Cited by 999
Selected Guidelines for Ethnobotanical Research: A Field Manual
Alexiades, M. N., & Sheldon, J. W. (1996) · Cited by 853
(2022) · TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY · doi:10.3906/botany · Cited by 613
Wild vascular plants gathered for consumption in the Polish countryside: a review
Łuczaj, Ł., & Szymański, W. M. (2007) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-3-17 · Cited by 477
Ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants in Spain
TARDÍO, J., PARDO-DE-SANTAYANA, M., & MORALES, R. (2006) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00549.x · Cited by 446
Self-citationT. Lockett, C. C. C. (2000) · International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/09637480050029700 · Cited by 344
Leporatti, M. L., & Ivancheva, S. (2003) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0378-8741(03)00047-3 · Cited by 323
Ethnobotany of caiçaras of the Atlantic Forest coast (Brazil)
Rossato, S. C., Leitão-Filho, H. F., & Begossi, A. (1999) · Economic Botany · doi:10.1007/bf02866716 · Cited by 296
Pieroni, A., Nebel, S., Quave, C., Münz, H., & Heinrich, M. (2002) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0378-8741(02)00052-1 · Cited by 274
Cited by
Evaluation of Polyphenolics Content and Antioxidant Activity in Edible Wild Fruits
Shan, S., Huang, X., Shah, M. H., & Abbasi, A. M. (2019) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2019/1381989 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Pardo-de-Santayana, M., Tardío, J., Blanco, E., Carvalho, A. M., Lastra, J. J., San Miguel, E., & Morales, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
- Published
- 2007-06-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-27
- ISSN
- 1746-4269 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127608683
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants used in the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal): a comparative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1746-4269-3-27
- The paper
- Pardo-de-Santayana, M., Tardío, J., Blanco, E., Carvalho, A. M., Lastra, J. J., San Miguel, E., & Morales, R. (2007). Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants used in the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal): a comparative study. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-3-27
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.