The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wild vascular plants gathered for consumption in the Polish countryside: a review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: This paper is an ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants gathered for consumption from the end of the 18th century to the present day, within the present borders of Poland. METHODS: 42 ethnographic and botanical sources documenting the culinary use of wild plants were analyzed. RESULTS: The use of 112 species (3.7% of the flora) has been recorded. Only half of them have been used since the 1960s. Three species: Cirsium rivulare, Euphorbia peplus and Scirpus sylvaticus have never before been reported as edible by ethnobotanical literature. The list of wild edible plants which are still commonly gathered includes only two green vegetables (Rumex acetosa leaves for soups and Oxalis acetosella as children's snack), 15 folk species of fruits and seeds (Crataegus spp., Corylus avellana, Fagus sylvatica, Fragaria vesca, Malus domestica, Prunus spinosa, Pyrus spp., Rosa canina, Rubus idaeus, Rubus sect. Rubus, Sambucus nigra, Vaccinium myrtillus, V. oxycoccos, V. uliginosum, V. vitis-idaea) and four taxa used for seasoning or as preservatives (Armoracia rusticana root and leaves, Carum carvi seeds, Juniperus communis pseudo-fruits and Quercus spp. leaves). The use of other species is either forgotten or very rare. In the past, several species were used for food in times of scarcity, most commonly Chenopodium album, Urtica dioica, U. urens, Elymus repens, Oxalis acetosella and Cirsium spp., but now the use of wild plants is mainly restricted to raw consumption or making juices, jams, wines and other preserves. The history of the gradual disappearance of the original barszcz, Heracleum sphondylium soup, from Polish cuisine has been researched in detail and two, previously unpublished, instances of its use in the 20th century have been found in the Carpathians. An increase in the culinary use of some wild plants due to media publications can be observed. CONCLUSION: Poland can be characterized as a country where the traditions of culinary use of wild plants became impoverished very early, compared to some parts of southern Europe. The present use of wild plants, even among the oldest generation, has been almost entirely restricted to fruits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An annotated checklist of the Italian vascular flora. Palombi Editori
Conti, F., Abbate, G., Alessandrini, A., & Blasi, C. (2005) · Unicam Scientific Publications (University of Camerino) · Cited by 1,035
An annotated check-list of the italian vascular flora
Conti, F., Scassellati, E., G., A., et al. (2004) · Unicam Scientific Publications (University of Camerino) · Cited by 910
Schmid, R., & Moerman, D. E. (1998) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/1224232 · Cited by 781
Ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants in Spain
TARDÍO, J., PARDO-DE-SANTAYANA, M., & MORALES, R. (2006) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00549.x · Cited by 446
Pieroni, A., Nebel, S., Quave, C., Münz, H., & Heinrich, M. (2002) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0378-8741(02)00052-1 · Cited by 274
Cornucopia: a source book of edible plants
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-5076 · Cited by 238
Pieroni, A., Nebel, S., Santoro, R. F., & Heinrich, M. (2005) · International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/09637480500146564 · Cited by 236
Wild Gathered Food Plants in the European Mediterranean: A Comparative Analysis
Leonti, M., Nebel, S., Rivera, D., & Heinrich, M. (2006) · Economic Botany · doi:10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[130:wgfpit]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 213
Wild food plants of popular use in Sicily
Lentini, F., & Venza, F. (2007) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-3-15 · Cited by 200
An ethnobotanical survey of wild edible plants of Paphos and Larnaca countryside of Cyprus
Della, A., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., & Hadjichambis, A. C. (2006) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-2-34 · Cited by 198
Cited by
Edible and Tended Wild Plants, Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Agroecology
Turner, N. J., Łuczaj, Ł. J., Migliorini, P., Pieroni, A., Dreon, A. L., Sacchetti, L. E., & Paoletti, M. G. (2011) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2011.554492 · Cited by 358
Self-citationPardo-de-Santayana, M., Tardío, J., Blanco, E., Carvalho, A. M., Lastra, J. J., San Miguel, E., & Morales, R. (2007) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-3-27 · Cited by 309
Plant identification credibility in ethnobotany: A closer look at Polish ethnographic studies
Łuczaj, Ł. J. (2010) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-6-36 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Łuczaj, Ł., & Szymański, W. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
- Published
- 2007-04-15
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-17
- ISSN
- 1746-4269 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169859902
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 8.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wild vascular plants gathered for consumption in the Polish countryside: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1746-4269-3-17
- The paper
- Łuczaj, Ł., & Szymański, W. M. (2007). Wild vascular plants gathered for consumption in the Polish countryside: a review. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-3-17
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.