The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants in Spain
Open accessAbstract
This paper compiles and evaluates the ethnobotanical data currently available on wild plants traditionally used for human consumption in Spain.Forty-six ethnobotanical and ethnographical sources from Spain were reviewed, together with some original unpublished field data from several Spanish provinces.A total of 419 plant species belonging to 67 families was recorded.A list of species, plant parts used, localization and method of consumption, and harvesting time is presented.Of the seven different food categories considered, green vegetables were the largest group, followed by plants used to prepare beverages, wild fruits, and plants used for seasoning, sweets, preservatives, and other uses.Important species according to the number of reports include: Foeniculum vulgare , Rorippa nasturtium-aquaticum , Origanum vulgare , Rubus ulmifolius , Silene vulgaris , Asparagus acutifolius , and Scolymus hispanicus .We studied data on the botanical families to which the plants in the different categories belonged, overlapping between groups and distribution of uses of the different species.Many wild food plants have also been used for medicinal purposes and some are considered to be poisonous.This review highlights the rich traditional knowledge on edible plants that has remained in rural Spain.Until recently, many wild plants were used as dietary supplements.However, most of this knowledge survives only in the memory of the elderly, and will probably disappear in a few decades.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wild vascular plants gathered for consumption in the Polish countryside: a review
Łuczaj, Ł., & Szymański, W. M. (2007) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-3-17 · Cited by 477
Pardo-de-Santayana, M., Tardío, J., Blanco, E., Carvalho, A. M., Lastra, J. J., San Miguel, E., & Morales, R. (2007) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-3-27 · Cited by 309
Self-citationPlant identification credibility in ethnobotany: A closer look at Polish ethnographic studies
Łuczaj, Ł. J. (2010) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-6-36 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- TARDÍO, J., PARDO-DE-SANTAYANA, M., & MORALES, R.
- Venue
- Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-71
- ISSN
- 0024-4074 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8339
- OpenAlex
- W2117916051
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants in Spain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00549.x
- The paper
- TARDÍO, J., PARDO-DE-SANTAYANA, M., & MORALES, R. (2006). Ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants in Spain. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00549.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.