Cited by 128Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSchool Health and Nursing EducationAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effectiveness of school-based preventive interventions on adolescent alcohol use: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Strøm, Henriette Kyrrestad, Adolfsen, Frode, Fossum, Sturla, Kaiser, Sabine, Martinussen, Monica·2014·Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preventive interventions for adolescents are an important priority within school systems. Several interventions have been developed, but the effectiveness of such interventions varies considerably between studies. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of universal school-based prevention programs on alcohol use among adolescents by using meta-analytic techniques. METHOD: A systematic literature search in the databases, PubMed (Medline), PsycINFO (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid) and WEB of Science (ISI) was conducted to search for empirical articles published in the period January 1990 to August 2014. RESULTS: In total, 28 randomized controlled studies with 39,289 participants at baseline were included. Of these 28 articles, 12 studies (N = 16279) reported continuous outcomes (frequency of alcohol use and quantity of alcohol use), and 16 studies (N = 23010) reported categorical data (proportion of students who drank alcohol). The results of the random effects analyses showed that the overall effect size among studies reporting continuous outcomes was small and demonstrated a favorable effect from the preventive interventions (Hedges' g = 0.22, p < .01). The effect size among studies reporting categorical outcomes was not significant (OR = 0.94, p = .25). The level of heterogeneity between studies was found to be significant in most analyses. Moderator analyses conducted to explore the heterogeneity showed neither significant difference between the different school levels (junior high schools and high schools), nor between the varied program intensities (low, medium and high intensity programs). The meta-regression analyses examining continuous moderators showed no significant effects for age or gender. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this meta-analysis showed that, overall, the effects of school-based preventive alcohol interventions on adolescent alcohol use were small but positive among studies reporting the continuous measures, whereas no effect was found among studies reporting the categorical outcomes. Possible population health outcomes, with recommendations for policy and practice, are discussed further in this paper.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1747-597x-9-48

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Flow diagram for studies included in the meta-analysis.
Figure 1 Flow diagram for studies included in the meta-analysis.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. World Health Organization: Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health. 2014, Geneva: World Health Organization
  2. WHO: European Action Plan to Reduce the Harmful use of Alcohol 2012–2020. World Health Organization Regional Committee for Europe Sixty First Session. Edited by: Organization WH. 2011, Baku: Azerbaijan
  3. Lipsey MW, Wilson BD: Practical Meta-Analysis, Volume 49. 2000, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
  4. Hedges LV, Olkin I: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. 1985, Orlando: Academic
  5. World Health Organization: European Action Plan to Reduce the Harmful use of Alcohol 2012 - 2020. 2012, Copenhagen: WHO Regional office for Europe

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 128

Metadata

Authors
Strøm, H. K., Adolfsen, F., Fossum, S., Kaiser, S., & Martinussen, M.
Affiliations
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Venue
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
Published
2014-12
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
48-48
ISSN
1747-597X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112152253
Cited by
128
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Helsedirektoratet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
adolescent alcohol use, school-based prevention, universal prevention, alcohol prevention interventions, intervention effectiveness, drinking frequency, junior high school, high schools, program intensity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking, Child, Female, Humans, Male, School Health Services, Program Evaluation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Databases, Bibliographic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review