Cited by 176Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationHealthcare Quality and Management

Overview of the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) and QUERI theme articles: QUERI Series

Open access
Stetler, Cheryl B, Mittman, Brian S, Francis, Joseph·2008·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuing challenges to timely adoption of evidence-based clinical practices in healthcare have generated intense interest in the development and application of new implementation methods and frameworks. These challenges led the United States (U.S.) Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to create the Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) in the late 1990s. QUERI's purpose was to harness VA's health services research expertise and resources in an ongoing system-wide effort to improve the performance of the VA healthcare system and, thus, quality of care for veterans. QUERI in turn created a systematic means of involving VA researchers both in enhancing VA healthcare quality, by implementing evidence-based practices, and in contributing to the continuing development of implementation science. The efforts of VA researchers to improve healthcare delivery practices through QUERI and related initiatives are documented in a growing body of literature. The scientific frameworks and methodological approaches developed and employed by QUERI are less well described. A QUERI Series of articles in Implementation Science will illustrate many of these QUERI tools. This Overview article introduces both QUERI and the Series. METHODS: The Overview briefly explains the purpose and context of the QUERI Program. It then describes the following: the key operational structure of QUERI Centers, guiding frameworks designed to enhance implementation and related research, QUERI's progress and promise to date, and the Series' general content. QUERI's frameworks include a core set of steps for diagnosing and closing quality gaps and, simultaneously, advancing implementation science. Throughout the paper, the envisioned involvement and activities of VA researchers within QUERI Centers also are highlighted. The Series is then described, illustrating the use of QUERI frameworks and other tools designed to respond to implementation challenges. CONCLUSION: QUERI's simultaneous pursuit of improvement and research goals within a large healthcare system may be unique. However, descriptions of this still-evolving effort, including its conceptual frameworks, methodological approaches, and enabling processes, should have applicability to implementation researchers in a range of health care settings. Thus, the Series is offered as a resource for other implementation research programs and researchers pursuing common goals in improving care and developing the field of implementation science.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1748-5908-3-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current conceptions of research designs fail to maximize clinical utility for practicing clinicians and other decision makers, for example through a failure to focus on external validity or implementation-related barriers and facilitators to routine use and sustainability of effective practices.

    “In addition, it has been suggested that current conceptions of research designs fail to “maximize clinical utility for practicing clinicians and other decision makers”18; for example, through a failure to focus on external validity or implementation-related barriers and facilitators to routine use and sustainability of “effective” practices.4,21,22”

    From Effectiveness-implementation Hybrid Designs: Combining Elements of Clinical Effectiveness and Implementation Research to Enhance Public Health Impact (2012) · cites this paper as [22]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Implementation research is focused on the adoption or uptake of clinical interventions by providers and/or systems of care, and its research outcomes are usually provider and/or system behaviors such as levels and rates of adoption and fidelity.

    “In contrast, implementation research is focused on the adoption or uptake of clinical interventions by providers and/or systems of care2,22,26; and research outcomes are usually provider and/or system behaviors, for example, levels and rates of adoption and fidelity to the clinical intervention.”

    From Effectiveness-implementation Hybrid Designs: Combining Elements of Clinical Effectiveness and Implementation Research to Enhance Public Health Impact (2012) · cites this paper as [22]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 176

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Graham ID Logan J Harrison MB Straus SE Tetroe J Caswell W Robinson N Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006 26 13 24 16557505 10.1002/chp.47 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Estabrooks CA Thompson DS Lovely JJ Hofmeyer A A guide to knowledge translation theory J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006 26 25 36 16557511 10.1002/chp.48 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Sussman S Valente TW Rohrbach LA Skara S Pentz MA Translation in the health professions: converting science into action Eval Health Prof 2006 29 7 32 16510878 10.1177/0163278705284441 · DOI
  4. Rabin BA Brownson RC Kerner JF Glasgow RE Methodologic challenges in disseminating evidence-based interventions to promote physical activity Am J Prev Med 2006 31 S24 S34 16979467 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.06.009 · DOI
  5. Phillips SD Allred CA Organizational management: what service providers are doing while researchers are disseminating interventions J Behav Health Serv Res 2006 33 156 175 16645905 10.1007/s11414-006-9016-4 · DOI
  6. Curran GM Thrush CR Smith JL Owen RR Ritchie M Chadwick D Implementing research findings into practice using clinical opinion leaders: barriers and lessons learned Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005 31 700 707 16430023
  7. Sales A Smith J Curran G Kochevar L Models, strategies, and tools. Theory in implementing evidence-based findings into health care practice J Gen Intern Med 2006 21 Suppl 2 S43 S49 16637960 PMC2557135
  8. Stetler CB Legro MW Rycroft-Malone J Bowman C Curran G Guihan M Hagedorn H Pineros S Wallace CM Role of "external facilitation" in implementation of research findings: a qualitative evaluation of facilitation experiences in the Veterans Health Administration Implement Sci 2006 1 23 17049080 10.1186/1748-5908-1-23 PMC1635058 · DOI
  9. Oliver A The Veterans Health Administration: an American success story? Milbank Q 2007 85 5 35 17319805 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00475.x PMC2690309 · DOI
  10. Fooks C Decter M The transformation experience of the Veterans Health Administration and its relevance to Canada Healthc Pap 2005 5 60 64 16088312
  11. Feussner JR Kizer KW Demakis JG The Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI): from evidence to action Med Care 2000 38 I1 I6 10843265 10.1097/00005650-200006001-00001 · DOI
  12. Kizer KW Demakis JG Feussner JR Reinventing VA health care: systematizing quality improvement and quality innovation Med Care 2000 38 I7 16 10843266 10.1097/00005650-200006001-00002 · DOI
  13. Tunis SR Stryer DB Clancy CM Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy JAMA 2003 290 1624 1632 14506122 10.1001/jama.290.12.1624 · DOI
  14. Lewis HD Jr. Davis JW Archibald DG Steinke WE Smitherman TC Doherty JE III Schnaper HW LeWinter MM Linares E Pouget JM Sabharwal SC Chesler E DeMots H Protective effects of aspirin against acute myocardial infarction and death in men with unstable angina. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study N Engl J Med 1983 309 396 403 6135989
  15. Francis J Perlin JB Improving performance through knowledge translation in the Veterans Health Administration J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006 26 63 71 16557507 10.1002/chp.52 · DOI
  16. McQueen L Mittman BS Demakis JG Overview of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004 11 339 343 15187071 10.1197/jamia.M1499 PMC516239 · DOI
  17. Fremont AM Joyce G Anaya HD Bowman CC Halloran JP Chang SW Bozzette SA Asch SM An HIV collaborative in the VHA: do advanced HIT and one-day sessions change the collaborative experience? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2006 32 324 336 16776387
  18. Weaver FM Smith B Lavela S Wallace C Evans CT Hammond M Goldstein B Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates in veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders J Spinal Cord Med 2007 30 10 19 17387805 PMC2032002
  19. Bradley KA Williams EC Achtmeyer CE Volpp B Collins BJ Kivlahan DR Implementation of evidence-based alcohol screening in the Veterans Health Administration Am J Manag Care 2006 12 597 606 17026414
  20. Feussner JR Demakis JG Kizer KW VA's Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Med Care 2000 38 VA QUERI Supplement 10.1097/00005650-200006001-00001 10843265 · DOI
  21. Kiefe CI Sales A A state-of-the-art conference on implementing evidence in health care. Reasons and recommendations J Gen Intern Med 2006 21 Suppl 2 S67 S70 16637964 PMC2557139
  22. Hagedorn H Hogan M Smith JL Bowman C Curran GM Espadas D Kimmel B Kochevar L Legro MW Sales AE Lessons learned about implementing research evidence into clinical practice. Experiences from VA QUERI J Gen Intern Med 2006 21 Suppl 2 S21 S24 16637956 PMC2557131
  23. Hynes DM Perrin RA Rappaport S Stevens JM Demakis JG Informatics resources to support health care quality improvement in the veterans health administration J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004 11 344 350 15187063 10.1197/jamia.M1548 PMC516240 · DOI
  24. Owen RR Thrush CR Cannon D Sloan KL Curran G Hudson T Austen M Ritchie M Use of electronic medical record data for quality improvement in schizophrenia treatment J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004 11 351 357 15187073 10.1197/jamia.M1498 PMC516241 · DOI
  25. Young AS Mintz J Cohen AN Chinman MJ A network-based system to improve care for schizophrenia: the Medical Informatics Network Tool (MINT) J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004 11 358 367 15187072 10.1197/jamia.M1492 PMC516242 · DOI
  26. Dobscha SK Corson K Hickam DH Perrin NA Kraemer DF Gerrity MS Depression decision support in primary care: a cluster randomized trial Ann Intern Med 2006 145 477 487 17015865
  27. Birkmeyer JD Kerr E Dirnick J Committee on Redesigning Health Insurance Performance Measures PPIP Improving the quality of quality measurement Performance Measurement: Accelerating Improvement 2006 Washington, D.C., The National Academies Press 177 203 Accessed 2-27-2008
  28. Heidenreich PA Spertus JA Jones PG Weintraub WS Rumsfeld JS Rathore SS Peterson ED Masoudi FA Krumholz HM Havranek EP Conard MW Williams RE Health status identifies heart failure outpatients at risk for hospitalization or death J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 47 752 756 16487840 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.021 · DOI
  29. Williams LS Kroenke K Bakas T Plue LD Brizendine E Tu W Hendrie H Care management of poststroke depression: a randomized, controlled trial Stroke 2007 38 998 1003 17303771 10.1161/01.STR.0000257319.14023.61 · DOI
  30. An LC Zhu SH Nelson DB Arikian NJ Nugent S Partin MR Joseph AM Benefits of telephone care over primary care for smoking cessation: a randomized trial Arch Intern Med 2006 166 536 542 16534040 10.1001/archinte.166.5.536 · DOI
  31. Tiet QQ Byrnes HF Barnett P Finney JW A practical system for monitoring the outcomes of substance use disorder patients J Subst Abuse Treat 2006 30 337 347 16716849 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Bakas T Champion V Perkins SM Farran CJ Williams LS Psychometric testing of the revised 15-item Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale Nurs Res 2006 55 346 355 16980835 10.1097/00006199-200609000-00007 · DOI
  33. Rubenstein LV Meredith LS Parker LE Gordon NP Hickey SC Oken C Lee ML Impacts of evidence-based quality improvement on depression in primary care: a randomized experiment J Gen Intern Med 2006 21 1027 1035 16836631 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00549.x PMC1831644 · DOI
  34. Frayne SM Halanych JH Miller DR Wang F Lin H Pogach L Sharkansky EJ Keane TM Skinner KM Rosen CS Berlowitz DR Disparities in diabetes care: impact of mental illness. Arch Intern Med 2005 165 2631 2638 16344421 10.1001/archinte.165.22.2631 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Greenberg JD Tiwari A Rajan M Miller D Natarajan S Pogach L Determinants of sustained uncontrolled blood pressure in a national cohort of persons with diabetes Am J Hypertens 2006 19 161 169 16448886 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.06.032 · DOI
  36. Ko DT Tu JV Masoudi FA Wang Y Havranek EP Rathore SS Newman AM Donovan LR Lee DS Foody JM Krumholz HM Quality of care and outcomes of older patients with heart failure hospitalized in the United States and Canada Arch Intern Med 2005 165 2486 2492 16314545 10.1001/archinte.165.21.2486 · DOI
  37. Maynard C Lowy E Rumsfeld J Sales AE Sun H Kopjar B Fleming B Jesse RL Rusch R Fihn SD The prevalence and outcomes of in-hospital acute myocardial infarction in the Department of Veterans Affairs Health System Arch Intern Med 2006 166 1410 1416 16832007 10.1001/archinte.166.13.1410 · DOI
  38. Gironda RJ Clark ME Massengale JP Walker RL Pain among veterans of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom Pain Med 2006 7 339 343 16898945 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00146.x · DOI
  39. Collins EG Langbein WE Smith B Hendricks R Hammond M Weaver F Patients' perspective on the comprehensive preventive health evaluation in veterans with spinal cord injury Spinal Cord 2005 43 366 374 15685261 10.1038/sj.sc.3101708 · DOI
  40. Peacock F Morris DL Anwaruddin S Christenson RH Collinson PO Goodacre SW Januzzi JL Jesse RL Kaski JC Kontos MC Lefevre G Mutrie D Sinha MK Uettwiller-Geiger D Pollack CV Meta-analysis of ischemia-modified albumin to rule out acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department Am Heart J 2006 152 253 262 16875905 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.12.024 · DOI
  41. Felker BL Chaney E Rubenstein LV Bonner LM Yano EM Parker LE Worley LL Sherman SE Ober S Developing Effective Collaboration Between Primary Care and Mental Health Providers Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2006 8 12 16 16862248 PMC1510905
  42. Fortney JC Pyne JM Edlund MJ Robinson DE Mittal D Henderson KL Design and implementation of the telemedicine-enhanced antidepressant management study Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2006 28 18 26 16377361 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.07.001 · DOI
  43. Krein SL Kerr E Vijan S Hayward R Improving eye care for veterans with diabetes: an example of using the QUERI steps to move from evidence to implementation Implement Sci 2008 [Article in QUERI Series] 18353187 PMC2277434
  44. Willenbring ML Postier AC Kenny M Hagedorn H Innovative approaches to measuring outcomes and providing feedback: The Opioid Agonist Therapy Effecitveness (OpiATE) Initiative. Journal of Maintenance in the Addictions 2006 3 The Haworth Press Inc. 13 32 Accessed 2-27-2008 10.1300/J126v03n01_03 · DOI
  45. Patterson ES Nguyen AD Halloran JP Asch SM Human factors barriers to the effective use of ten HIV clinical reminders J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004 11 50 59 14527974 10.1197/jamia.M1364 PMC305458 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Hudson TJ Owen RR Thrush CR Han X Pyne JM Thapa P Sullivan G A pilot study of barriers to medication adherence in schizophrenia J Clin Psychiatry 2004 65 211 216 15003075
  47. Weaver FM Goldstein B Hammond M Improving respiratory vaccination rates in veterans with spinal cord injury/disorders: lessons learned SCI Nurs 2004 21 143 148 15553057
  48. Willenbring ML Hagedorn H Postier AC Kenny M The opiate agonist therapy effectiveness initiative: Improving treatment for opioid dependence. Poster Presented at the Veterans Affairs' Health Services Research and Development, National Conference 2003 Accessed 2-27-2008

Authors
Stetler, C. B., Mittman, B. S., & Francis, J.
Affiliations
  • Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Corresponding author
Stetler, Cheryl B
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2008-02-15
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
8-8
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985620951
Cited by
176
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
33.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
evidence-based practice adoption, Veterans Affairs healthcare system, quality improvement, implementation framework, quality gap, health services research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review