Cited by 336Diabetes Management and EducationChronic Disease Management StrategiesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Disparities in Diabetes Care: Impact of Mental Illness

Frayne, Susan M., Halanych, Jewell H., Miller, Donald R., Wang, Fei, Lin, Hai, Pogach, Leonard, Sharkansky, Erica J., Keane, Terence M. +3 more·2005·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence indicates that patients with mental health conditions (MHCs) may receive less intensive medical care. Diabetes serves as a useful condition in which to test for MHC-related disparities in care. We examined whether quality measures for diabetes care are worse for patients with or without MHCs. METHODS: This national, cross-sectional study included 313 586 noninstitutionalized Veterans Health Administration patients with diabetes (identified from diagnostic codes and prescriptions) whose Veterans Health Administration facility transmitted laboratory data to a central database; 76 799 (25%) had MHCs (based on diagnostic codes for depressed mood, anxiety, psychosis, manic symptoms, substance use disorders, personality disorders, and other categories). National data from Veterans Health Administration records, Medicare claims, and a national survey were linked to characterize 1999 diabetes care. RESULTS: Failure to meet diabetes performance measures was more common in patients with MHCs: unadjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) was 1.24 (1.22-1.27) for no hemoglobin A(1c) testing, 1.25 (1.23-1.28) for no low-density lipoprotein cholesterol testing, 1.05 (1.03-1.07) for no eye examination, 1.32 (1.30-1.35) for poor glycemic control, and 1.17 (1.15-1.20) for poor lipemic control. Disparities persisted after case mix adjustment and were more pronounced with specific MHCs (psychotic, manic, substance use, and personality disorders). The percentage not meeting diabetes care standards increased with increasing number of MHCs. CONCLUSION: Patients with mental illness merit special attention in national diabetes quality improvement efforts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.165.22.2631

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Underdiagnosis of somatic disorders in schizophrenic patients has been described in many studies.

    “Underdiagnosis of somatic disorders in schizophrenic patients has been described in many other studies (Frayne et al. 2005, Laursen et al. 2009, Osborn et al. 2008).”

    From Excess early mortality in schizophrenia. (2014) · cites this paper as Frayne et al. 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frayne, S. M., Halanych, J. H., Miller, D. R., Wang, F., Lin, H., Pogach, L., Sharkansky, E. J., Keane, T. M., Skinner, K. M., Rosen, C. S., & Berlowitz, D. R.
Affiliations
Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2005-12-12
Volume
165
Issue
22
Pages
2631
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127424395
Cited by
336
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 25
FWCI
10.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
diabetes management, mental illness, health care disparities, veterans, quality of care, glycemic control, hemoglobin A1c testing, LDL cholesterol testing, eye examination, substance use disorders, psychosis, manic disorder, personality disorders, depression, anxiety, risk adjustment
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, United States, Veterans, Cohort Studies, Health Care Surveys, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Databases as Topic, Racial Groups, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review