Cited by 44Airway Management and Intubation TechniquesAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsFacial Trauma and Fracture Management

Maxillofacial trauma patient: coping with the difficult airway

Open access
Krausz, Amir A, el-Naaj, Imad Abu, Barak, Michal·2009·World Journal of Emergency Surgery

Abstract

Establishing a secure airway in a trauma patient is one of the primary essentials of treatment. Any flaw in airway management may lead to grave morbidity and mortality. Maxillofacial trauma presents a complex problem with regard to the patient's airway. By definition, the injury compromises the patient's airway and it is, therefore, must be protected. In most cases, the patient undergoes surgery for maxillofacial trauma or for other, more severe, life-threatening injuries, and securing the airway is the first step in the introduction of general anaesthesia. In such patients, we anticipate difficult endotracheal intubation and, often, also difficult mask ventilation. In addition, the patient is usually regarded as having a "full stomach" and has not been cleared of a C-spine injury, which may complicate airway management furthermore. The time available to accomplish the task is short and the patient's condition may deteriorate rapidly. Both decision-making and performance are impaired in such circumstances. In this review, we discuss the complexity of the situation and present a treatment approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1749-7922-4-21

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with mandibular fractures in 2 or more locations may be easier to intubate due to increased mobility of the mandible and attached soft tissues.

    “Although patients with mandibular fractures in 2 or more locations may be easier to intubate due to increased mobility of the mandible and attached soft tissues”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [66]

    In “Maxillofacial Trauma and Airway Injuries” (page unavailable), the paper says a bilateral anterior mandibular fracture may displace the tongue backward and block the airway. “The Complexity of the situation” describes maxillofacial trauma as often making intubation difficult. The paper does not describe increased mandibular mobility as making these patients easier to intubate. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Associated condylar fractures may cause a mechanical obstruction limiting mouth opening, making laryngoscopy and intubation difficult.

    “associated condylar fractures may cause a mechanical obstruction limiting mouth opening, making laryngoscopy and intubation difficult.64,66”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [66]

    In “Approach to the Maxillofacial Trauma Patient’s Airway Management” (page not provided), the paper says temporomandibular joint injury can limit mouth opening and complicate airway management. It does not specifically identify condylar fractures or describe a mechanical obstruction caused by them. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Walls RM Management of the difficult airway in the trauma patient Emerg Med Clin North Am 1998 16 45 61 9496314 10.1016/S0733-8627(05)70348-5 · DOI
  2. Domino KB Posner KL Caplan RA Cheney FW Airway injury during anesthesia: a closed claims analysis Anesthesiology 1999 91 1703 1711 10598613 10.1097/00000542-199912000-00023 · DOI
  3. Peterson GN Domino KB Caplan RA Posner KL Lee LA Cheney FW Management of the difficult airway: a closed claims analysis Anesthesiology 2005 103 33 39 15983454 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00009 · DOI
  4. Garcia A Critical care issues in the early management of severe trauma Surg Clin North Am 2006 86 1359 1387 17116453 10.1016/j.suc.2006.07.004 PMC3413270 · DOI
  5. Gruen RL Jurkovich GJ McIntyre LK Foy HM Maier RV Patterns of errors contributing to trauma mortality: lessons learned from 2,594 deaths Ann Surg 2006 244 371 380 16926563 PMC1856538
  6. Hutchison I Lawlor M Skinner D ABC of major trauma. Major maxillofacial injuries BMJ 1990 301 595 599 2242459 10.1136/bmj.301.6752.595 PMC1663741 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Crosby ET Airway management in adults after cervical spine trauma Anesthesiology 2006 104 1293 1318 16732102 10.1097/00000542-200606000-00026 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Manoach S Paladino L Manual in-line stabilization for acute airway management of suspected cervical spine injury: historical review and current questions Ann Emerg Med 2007 50 236 245 17337093 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.01.009 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Santoni BG Hindman BJ Puttlitz CM Weeks JB Johnson N Maktabi MA Todd MM Manual in-line stabilization increases pressures applied by the laryngoscope blade during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation Anesthesiology 2009 110 24 31 19104166 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318190b556 · DOI
  10. Robitaille A Williams SR Tremblay MH Guilbert F Thériault M Drolet P Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with manual in-line stabilization: direct laryngoscopy versus GlideScope videolaryngoscopy Anesth Analg 2008 106 935 941 18292443 10.1213/ane.0b013e318161769e · DOI
  11. Sellick BA Cricoid pressure to control regurgitation of stomach contents during induction of anaesthesia Lancet 1961 2 404 406 13749923 10.1016/S0140-6736(61)92485-0 · DOI
  12. Ellis DY Harris T Zideman D Cricoid pressure in emergency department rapid sequence tracheal intubations: a risk-benefit analysis Ann Emerg Med 2007 50 653 665 17681642 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.05.006 · DOI
  13. Levitan RM Kinkle WC Levin WJ Everett WW Laryngeal view during laryngoscopy: a randomized trial comparing cricoid pressure, backward-upward-rightward pressure, and bimanual laryngoscopy Ann Emerg Med 2006 47 548 555 16713784 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.013 · DOI
  14. Noguchi T Koga K Shiga Y Shigematsu A The gum elastic bougie eases tracheal intubation while applying cricoid pressure compared to a stylet Can J Anaesth 2003 50 712 717 12944447 10.1007/BF03018715 · DOI
  15. Haslam N Parker L Duggan JE Effect of cricoid pressure on the view at laryngoscopy Anaesthesia 2005 60 41 47 15601271 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.04010.x · DOI
  16. Mort TC Complications of emergency tracheal intubation: immediate airway-related consequences: part II J Intensive Care Med 2007 22 208 215 17712056 10.1177/0885066607301359 · DOI
  17. Li J Murphy-Lavoie H Bugas C Martinez J Preston C Complications of emergency intubation with and without paralysis Am J Emerg Med 1999 17 141 143 10102312 10.1016/S0735-6757(99)90046-3 · DOI
  18. Benedetto WJ Hess DR Gettings E Bigatello LM Toon H Hurford WE Schmidt U Urgent tracheal intubation in general hospital units: an observational study J Clin Anesth 2007 19 20 24 17321922 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.05.018 · DOI
  19. Mort TC Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts Anesth Analg 2004 99 607 613 15271750 10.1213/01.ANE.0000122825.04923.15 · DOI
  20. Schmidt UH Kumwilaisak K Bittner E George E Hess D Effects of supervision by attending anesthesiologists on complications of emergency tracheal intubation Anesthesiology 2008 109 973 977 19034093 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818ddb90 · DOI
  21. Hodzovic I Petterson J Wilkes AR Latto IP Fibreoptic intubation using three airway conduits in a manikin: the effect of operator experience Anaesthesia 2007 62 591 597 17506738 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05054.x · DOI
  22. Boylan JF Kavanagh BP Emergency airway management: competence versus expertise? Anesthesiology 2008 109 945 947 19034086 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818e3f8f · DOI
  23. Kovacs G Law JA Ross J Tallon J MacQuarrie K Petrie D Campbell S Soder C Acute airway management in the emergency department by non-anesthesiologists Can J Anaesth 2004 51 174 180 14766697 10.1007/BF03018780 · DOI
  24. Peralta R Hurford WE Airway trauma Int Anesthesiol Clin 2000 38 111 127 10984849 10.1097/00004311-200007000-00008 · DOI
  25. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway Anesthesiology 2003 98 1269 1277 12717151 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00032 · DOI
  26. Rabitsch W Schellongowski P Staudinger T Hofbauer R Dufek V Eder B Raab H Thell R Schuster E Frass M Comparison of a conventional tracheal airway with the Combitube in an urban emergency medical services system run by physicians Resuscitation 2003 57 27 32 12668296 10.1016/S0300-9572(02)00435-5 · DOI
  27. Koerner IP Brambrink AM Fiberoptic techniques Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2005 19 611 621 16408537 10.1016/j.bpa.2005.07.006 · DOI
  28. Vézina MC Trépanier CA Nicole PC Lessard MR Complications associated with the Esophageal-Tracheal Combitube in the pre-hospital setting Can J Anaesth 2007 54 124 128 17272251 10.1007/BF03022008 · DOI
  29. Helm M Gries A Mutzbauer T Surgical approach in difficult airway management Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2005 19 623 640 16408538 10.1016/j.bpa.2005.06.002 · DOI
  30. Kearney PA Griffen MM Ochoa JB Boulanger BR Tseui BJ Mentzer RM Jr A single-center 8-year experience with percutaneous dilational tracheostomy Ann Surg 2000 231 701 709 10767791 10.1097/00000658-200005000-00010 PMC1421057 · DOI
  31. Dob DP McLure HA Soni N Failed intubation and emergency percutaneous tracheostomy Anaesthesia 1998 53 72 74 9505746 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1998.00253.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krausz, A. A., el-Naaj, I. A., & Barak, M.
Affiliations
Rambam Health Care Campus (IL)
Venue
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Published
2009-05-27
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
21-21
ISSN
1749-7922 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134455713
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • World Journal of Emergency Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Keywords
maxillofacial trauma, difficult airway, airway management, difficult intubation, difficult mask ventilation, general anesthesia, full stomach, trauma surgery, emergency airway management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review