The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engineering BioBrick vectors from BioBrick parts
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The underlying goal of synthetic biology is to make the process of engineering biological systems easier. Recent work has focused on defining and developing standard biological parts. The technical standard that has gained the most traction in the synthetic biology community is the BioBrick standard for physical composition of genetic parts. Parts that conform to the BioBrick assembly standard are BioBrick standard biological parts. To date, over 2,000 BioBrick parts have been contributed to, and are available from, the Registry of Standard Biological Parts. RESULTS: Here we extended the same advantages of BioBrick standard biological parts to the plasmid-based vectors that are used to provide and propagate BioBrick parts. We developed a process for engineering BioBrick vectors from BioBrick parts. We designed a new set of BioBrick parts that encode many useful vector functions. We combined the new parts to make a BioBrick base vector that facilitates BioBrick vector construction. We demonstrated the utility of the process by constructing seven new BioBrick vectors. We also successfully used the resulting vectors to assemble and propagate other BioBrick standard biological parts. CONCLUSION: We extended the principles of part reuse and standardization to BioBrick vectors. As a result, myriad new BioBrick vectors can be readily produced from all existing and newly designed BioBrick parts. We invite the synthetic biology community to (1) use the process to make and share new BioBrick vectors; (2) expand the current collection of BioBrick vector parts; and (3) characterize and improve the available collection of BioBrick vector parts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foundations for engineering biology
Endy, D. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04342 · Cited by 1,511
Self-citation
Cited by
Multigene editing in the Escherichia coli genome via the CRISPR-Cas9 system
Jiang, Y., Chen, B., Duan, C., Sun, B., Yang, J., & Yang, S. (2015) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.04023-14 · Cited by 1,362
The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems
Purnick, P. E. M., & Weiss, R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2698 · Cited by 1,181
A modular system for Clostridium shuttle plasmids
Heap, J. T., Pennington, O. J., Cartman, S. T., & Minton, N. P. (2009) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2009.05.004 · Cited by 489
Synthetic DNA Synthesis and Assembly: Putting the Synthetic in Synthetic Biology
Hughes, R. A., & Ellington, A. D. (2017) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a023812 · Cited by 411
Rerouting Carbon Flux to Enhance Photosynthetic Productivity
Ducat, D. C., Avelar-Rivas, J. A., Way, J. C., & Silver, P. A. (2012) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.07901-11 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Shetty, R. P., Endy, D., & Knight, T. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Engineering
- Published
- 2008-04-14
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-5
- ISSN
- 1754-1611 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113983551
- Cited by
- 760
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.