Cited by 1,362CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Multigene editing in the Escherichia coli genome via the CRISPR-Cas9 system

Open access
Jiang, Yu, Chen, Biao, Duan, Chunlan, Sun, Bingbing, Yang, Junjie, Yang, Sheng·2015·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

An efficient genome-scale editing tool is required for construction of industrially useful microbes. We describe a targeted, continual multigene editing strategy that was applied to the Escherichia coli genome by using the Streptococcus pyogenes type II CRISPR-Cas9 system to realize a variety of precise genome modifications, including gene deletion and insertion, with a highest efficiency of 100%, which was able to achieve simultaneous multigene editing of up to three targets. The system also demonstrated successful targeted chromosomal deletions in Tatumella citrea, another species of the Enterobacteriaceae, with highest efficiency of 100%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.04023-14

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]1. Ingram LO, Gomez PF, Lai X, Moniruzzaman M, Wood BE, Yomano LP, York SW. 1998. Metabolic engineering of bacteria for ethanol production. Biotechnol Bioeng 58: 204-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002 /(SICI)1097-0290(19980420)58:2/3 < 204::AID-BIT13 > 3.0.CO;2-C.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiang, Y., Chen, B., Duan, C., Sun, B., Yang, J., & Yang, S.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2015-04
Volume
81
Issue
7
Pages
2506-2514
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2120263648
Cited by
1,362
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 134 · 2025: 188 · 2024: 183 · 2023: 160 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 22
FWCI
29.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, Streptococcus pyogenes, Escherichia coli genome, targeted gene deletion, gene insertion, Enterobacteriaceae
MeSH terms
Enterobacteriaceae, Genes, Bacterial, Genetics, Microbial, Molecular Biology, Recombination, Genetic, Streptococcus pyogenes, Genome, Bacterial, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review