The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microalgal biomass production pathways: evaluation of life cycle environmental impacts
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Microalgae are touted as an attractive alternative to traditional forms of biomass for biofuel production, due to high productivity, ability to be cultivated on marginal lands, and potential to utilize carbon dioxide (CO2) from industrial flue gas. This work examines the fossil energy return on investment (EROIfossil), greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and direct Water Demands (WD) of producing dried algal biomass through the cultivation of microalgae in Open Raceway Ponds (ORP) for 21 geographic locations in the contiguous United States (U.S.). For each location, comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) is performed for multiple microalgal biomass production pathways, consisting of a combination of cultivation and harvesting options. RESULTS: Results indicate that the EROIfossil for microalgae biomass vary from 0.38 to 1.08 with life cycle GHG emissions of -46.2 to 48.9 (g CO2 eq/MJ-biomass) and direct WDs of 20.8 to 38.8 (Liters/MJ-biomass) over the range of scenarios analyzed. Further anaylsis reveals that the EROIfossil for production pathways is relatively location invariant, and that algae's life cycle energy balance and GHG impacts are highly dependent on cultivation and harvesting parameters. Contrarily, algae's direct water demands were found to be highly sensitive to geographic location, and thus may be a constraining factor in sustainable algal-derived biofuel production. Additionally, scenarios with promising EROIfossil and GHG emissions profiles are plagued with high technological uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high variability in microalgae's energy and environmental performance, careful evaluation of the algae-to-fuel supply chain is necessary to ensure the long-term sustainability of emerging algal biofuel systems. Alternative production scenarios and technologies may have the potential to reduce the critical demands of biomass production, and should be considered to make algae a viable and more efficient biofuel alternative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Long-term sustainability considerations, including land use competition and lifecycle environmental impacts, necessitate strategic planning and mitigation measures [32].”
From A Holistic Approach to Circular Bioeconomy Through the Sustainable Utilization of Microalgal Biomass for Biofuel and Other Value-Added Products (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“Integrating microalgae biofuel production systems into existing energy infrastructure and supply chains presents logistical and technical challenges.”
From A Holistic Approach to Circular Bioeconomy Through the Sustainable Utilization of Microalgal Biomass for Biofuel and Other Value-Added Products (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chisti, Y. (2007) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001 · Cited by 9,524
Second Generation Biofuels: High-Efficiency Microalgae for Biodiesel Production
Schenk, P. M., Thomas‐Hall, S. R., Stephens, E., Marx, U. C., Mussgnug, J. H., Posten, C. H., Kruse, O., & Hankamer, B. D. (2008) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-008-9008-8 · Cited by 2,335
Micro-algae as a source of protein
Becker, E. W. (2007) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.11.002 · Cited by 2,311
Biodiesel from microalgae beats bioethanol
Chisti, Y. (2008) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.12.002 · Cited by 2,128
An outlook on microalgal biofuels
Wijffels, R. H., & Barbosa, M. J. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1189003 · Cited by 1,886
Life-Cycle Assessment of Biodiesel Production from Microalgae
Lardon, L., Hélias, A., Sialve, B., Steyer, J.-P., & Bernard, O. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es900705j · Cited by 1,528
An overview of second generation biofuel technologies
Sims, R. E. H., Mabee, W., Saddler, J. N., & Taylor, M. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.046 · Cited by 1,497
Williams, P. J. L. B., & Laurens, L. M. L. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/b924978h · Cited by 1,223
Anaerobic digestion of microalgae as a necessary step to make microalgal biodiesel sustainable
Sialve, B., Bernet, N., & Bernard, O. (2009) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.03.001 · Cited by 1,187
Rawat, I., Ranjith Kumar, R., Mutanda, T., & Bux, F. (2011) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.025 · Cited by 1,185
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cuéllar-Franca, R. M., & Azapagic, A. (2015) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2014.12.001 · Cited by 1,571
Panis, G., & Carreón, J. R. (2016) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2016.06.007 · Cited by 453
Genome editing of model oleaginous microalgae Nannochloropsis spp. by CRISPR /Cas9
Wang, Q., Lu, Y., Xin, Y., Wei, L., Huang, S., & Xu, J. (2016) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13307 · Cited by 312
Carneiro, M. L. N. M., Pradelle, F., Braga, S. L., Gomes, M. S. P., Martins, A. R. F. A., Turkovics, F., & Pradelle, R. N. C. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.152 · Cited by 239
Ren, H.-Y., Liu, B.-F., Ma, C., Zhao, L., & Ren, N. (2013) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-143 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Zaimes, G. G., & Khanna, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Khanna, Vikas
- Venue
- Biotechnology for Biofuels
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 88
- ISSN
- 1754-6834 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3693881
- OpenAlex
- W2062546573
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Biotechnology for Biofuels (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Pittsburgh
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Keywords
- microalgae, algal biofuels, raceway ponds, life cycle assessment, energy return on investment, greenhouse gas emissions, water demand, algal harvesting, cultivation parameters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
