The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms for human genomic rearrangements
Open accessAbstract
Genomic rearrangements describe gross DNA changes of the size ranging from a couple of hundred base pairs, the size of an average exon, to megabases (Mb). When greater than 3 to 5 Mb, such changes are usually visible microscopically by chromosome studies. Human diseases that result from genomic rearrangements have been called genomic disorders. Three major mechanisms have been proposed for genomic rearrangements in the human genome. Non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) is mostly mediated by low-copy repeats (LCRs) with recombination hotspots, gene conversion and apparent minimal efficient processing segments. NAHR accounts for most of the recurrent rearrangements: those that share a common size, show clustering of breakpoints, and recur in multiple individuals. Non-recurrent rearrangements are of different sizes in each patient, but may share a smallest region of overlap whose change in copy number may result in shared clinical features among different patients. LCRs do not mediate, but may stimulate non-recurrent events. Some rare NAHRs can also be mediated by highly homologous repetitive sequences (for example, Alu, LINE); these NAHRs account for some of the non-recurrent rearrangements. Other non-recurrent rearrangements can be explained by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and the Fork Stalling and Template Switching (FoSTeS) models. These mechanisms occur both in germ cells, where the rearrangements can be associated with genomic disorders, and in somatic cells in which such genomic rearrangements can cause disorders such as cancer. NAHR, NHEJ and FoSTeS probably account for the majority of genomic rearrangements in our genome and the frequency distribution of the three at a given locus may partially reflect the genomic architecture in proximity to that locus. We provide a review of the current understanding of these three models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McDonald-McGinn, D. M., Sullivan, K. E., Marino, B., Philip, N., Swillen, A., Vorstman, J. A. S., Zackai, E. H., Emanuel, B. S., Vermeesch, J. R., Morrow, B. E., et al. (2015) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.71 · Cited by 2,236
Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD®): 2003 update: HGMD 2003 UPDATE
Stenson, P. D., Ball, E. V., Mort, M., Phillips, A. D., Shiel, J. A., Thomas, N. S. T., Abeysinghe, S., Krawczak, M., & Cooper, D. N. (2003) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.10212 · Cited by 1,829
Frameshift Mutations and the Genetic Code
Streisinger, G., Okada, Y., Emrich, J., Newton, J., Tsugita, A., Terzaghi, E., & Inouye, M. (1966) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.014 · Cited by 1,400 · cited 1×
“The SRS model is an extension of the classical replication slippage model [95]; it assumes that the 3' end of the nascent strand could dissociate from the original template and invade other templates on the basis of microhomology.”
MethodDNA duplication associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A
Lupski, J. R., de Oca-Luna, R. M., Slaugenhaupt, S., Pentao, L., Guzzetta, V., Trask, B. J., Saucedo-Cardenas, O., Barker, D. F., Killian, J. M., Garcia, C. A., et al. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90613-4 · Cited by 1,333
Self-citationPaired-End Mapping Reveals Extensive Structural Variation in the Human Genome
Korbel, J. O., Urban, A. E., Affourtit, J. P., Godwin, B., Grubert, F., Simons, J. F., Kim, P. M., Palejev, D., Carriero, N. J., Du, L., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1149504 · Cited by 1,163
Mapping and sequencing of structural variation from eight human genomes
Kidd, J. M., Cooper, G. M., Donahue, W. F., Hayden, H. S., Sampas, N., Graves, T., Hansen, N., Teague, B., Alkan, C., Antonacci, F., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06862 · Cited by 1,119
Mechanism and regulation of human non-homologous DNA end-joining
Lieber, M. R., Ma, Y., Pannicke, U., & Schwarz, K. (2003) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1202 · Cited by 973
Segmental Duplications and Copy-Number Variation in the Human Genome
Sharp, A. J., Locke, D. P., McGrath, S. D., Cheng, Z., Bailey, J. A., Vallente, R. U., Pertz, L. M., Clark, R. A., Schwartz, S., Segraves, R., et al. (2005) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/431652 · Cited by 972
Genome architecture, rearrangements and genomic disorders
Stankiewicz, P., & Lupski, J. R. (2002) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(02)02592-1 · Cited by 925
Self-citationLee, J. A., Carvalho, C. M. B., & Lupski, J. R. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.037 · Cited by 914
Self-citation
Cited by
Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Conrad, D. F., Pinto, D., Redon, R., Feuk, L., Gokcumen, O., Zhang, Y., Aerts, J., Andrews, T. D., Barnes, C., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08516 · Cited by 1,970
A copy number variation morbidity map of developmental delay
Cooper, G. M., Coe, B. P., Girirajan, S., Rosenfeld, J. A., Vu, T. H., Baker, C., Williams, C., Stalker, H., Hamid, R., Hannig, V., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.909 · Cited by 1,351
Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution
Zhang, F., Gu, W., Hurles, M. E., & Lupski, J. R. (2009) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164217 · Cited by 1,207
Self-citationStructural Variation in the Human Genome and its Role in Disease
Stankiewicz, P., & Lupski, J. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev-med-100708-204735 · Cited by 1,201
Self-citationCNVs: Harbingers of a Rare Variant Revolution in Psychiatric Genetics
Malhotra, D., & Sebat, J. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.039 · Cited by 854
Metadata
- Authors
- Gu, W., Zhang, F., & Lupski, J. R.
- Venue
- PathoGenetics
- Published
- 2008-11-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-4
- ISSN
- 1755-8417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167482501
- Cited by
- 710
- References
- 95
- FWCI
- 34.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms for human genomic rearrangements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1755-8417-1-4
- The paper
- Gu, W., Zhang, F., & Lupski, J. R. (2008). Mechanisms for human genomic rearrangements. PathoGenetics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8417-1-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
