Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiplexed measurements of gene signatures in different analytes using the Nanostring nCounter™ Assay System

Open access
Malkov, Vladislav A, Serikawa, Kyle A, Balantac, Noel, Watters, James, Geiss, Gary, Mashadi-Hossein, Afshin, Fare, Thomas·2009·BMC Research Notes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed NanoString's nCounter Analysis System for its ability to quantify gene expression of forty-eight genes in a single reaction with 100 ng of total RNA or an equivalent amount of tissue lysate. In the nCounter System, multiplexed gene expression target levels are directly detected, without enzymatic reactions, via two sequence-specific probes. The individual mRNA is captured with one mRNA target sequence-specific capture probe that is used in a post-hybridization affinity purification procedure. The second mRNA target specific-sequence and fluorescent-labeled colored coded probe is then used in the detection with the 3-component complex separated on a surface via an applied electric field followed by imaging. We evaluated reproducibility, accuracy, concordance with quantitative RT-PCR, linearity, dynamic range, and the ability of the system to assay different inputs (matched samples of total RNA from Flash Frozen (FF) and Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded Tissues (FFPET), and crude tissue lysates (CTL)). FINDINGS: The nCounter Analysis System provided data equivalent to that produced by Taqman(R)-based assays for genes expressed within the ranges of the calibration curves (above ~0.5 mRNA copies per human cell based on an assumption of 10 pg of total RNA per cell). System response was linear over more than two orders of magnitude with typical CVs of ~6% for concentrations above 1 fM (105 molecules per mL). Profiling the industry-standard MAQC data set yielded correlation coefficients of >0.83 for intensity values and >0.99 for measured ratios. Ninety percent of nCounter ratio measurements were within 1.27-1.33 fold changes of the Taqman(R) data (0.34-0.41 in log2 scale) for FF total RNA samples. CONCLUSION: The nCounter Analysis System generated robust data for multi-gene expression signatures across three different sample preparation conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1756-0500-2-80

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Malkov, V. A., Serikawa, K. A., Balantac, N., Watters, J., Geiss, G., Mashadi-Hossein, A., & Fare, T.
Venue
BMC Research Notes
Published
2009
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
80
ISSN
1756-0500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046911066
Cited by
161
References
3
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiplexed measurements of gene signatures in different analytes using the Nanostring nCounter™ Assay System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1756-0500-2-80
The paper
Malkov, V. A., Serikawa, K. A., Balantac, N., Watters, J., Geiss, G., Mashadi-Hossein, A., & Fare, T. (2009). Multiplexed measurements of gene signatures in different analytes using the Nanostring nCounter™ Assay System. BMC Research Notes. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-80

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.