Cited by 35Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Attitudes toward depression among Japanese non-psychiatric medical doctors: a cross-sectional study

Open access
Ohtsuki, Tsuyuka, Kodaka, Manami, Sakai, Rumi, Ishikura, Fuminobu, Watanabe, Yoichiro, Mann, Anthony, Haddad, Mark, Yamada, Mitsuhiko +1 more·2012·BMC Research Notes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Under-recognition of depression is common in many countries. Education of medical staff, focusing on their attitudes towards depression, may be necessary to change their behavior and enhance recognition of depression. Several studies have previously reported on attitudes toward depression among general physicians. However, little is known about attitudes of non-psychiatric doctors in Japan. In the present study, we surveyed non-psychiatric doctors' attitude toward depression. METHODS: The inclusion criteria of participants in the present study were as follows: 1) Japanese non-psychiatric doctors and 2) attendees in educational opportunities regarding depression care. We conveniently approached two populations: 1) a workshop to depression care for non-psychiatric doctors and 2) a general physician-psychiatrist (G-P) network group. We contacted 367 subjects. Attitudes toward depression were measured using the Depression Attitude Questionnaire (DAQ), a 20-item self-report questionnaire developed for general physicians. We report scores of each DAQ item and factors derived from exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: We received responses from 230 subjects, and we used DAQ data from 187 non-psychiatric doctors who met the inclusion criteria. All non-psychiatric doctors (n = 187) disagreed with "I feel comfortable in dealing with depressed patients' needs," while 60 % (n = 112) agreed with "Working with depressed patients is heavy going." Factor analysis indicated these items comprised a factor termed "Depression should be treated by psychiatrists" - to which 54 % of doctors (n = 101) agreed. Meanwhile, 67 % of doctors (n = 126) thought that nurses could be useful in depressed patient support. The three factors derived from the Japanese DAQ differed from models previously derived from British GP samples. The attitude of Japanese non-psychiatric doctors concerning whether depression should be treated by psychiatrists was markedly different to that of British GPs. CONCLUSIONS: Japanese non-psychiatric doctors believe that depression care is beyond the scope of their duties. It is suggested that educational programs or guidelines for depression care developed in other countries such as the UK are not directly adaptable for Japanese non-psychiatric doctors. Developing a focused educational program that motivates non-psychiatric doctors to play a role in depression care is necessary to enhance recognition and treatment of depression in Japan.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1756-0500-5-441

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ohtsuki, T., Kodaka, M., Sakai, R., Ishikura, F., Watanabe, Y., Mann, A., Haddad, M., Yamada, M., & Inagaki, M.
Affiliations
  • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • City, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Inagaki, Masatoshi
Venue
BMC Research Notes
Published
2012-08-16
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
441-441
ISSN
1756-0500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017431797
Cited by
33
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Research Notes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
attitudes toward depression, general practitioners, depression care, role of psychiatrists, physician training, Japan
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Japan, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review