Cited by 66scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Writing and PublishingPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Determinants of the citation rate of medical research publications from a developing country

Open access
Annalingam, Anupama, Damayanthi, Hasitha, Jayawardena, Ranil, Ranasinghe, Priyanga·2014·SpringerPlus

Abstract

Background: The number of citations received by an article is considered as an objective marker judging the importance and the quality of the research work. The present study aims to study the determinants of citations for research articles published by Sri Lankan authors. Methods: Papers were selectively retrieved from the SciVerse Scopus® (Elsevier Properties S.A, USA) database for 10 years from 1st January 1997 to 31st December 2006, of which 50% were selected for inclusion by simple random sampling. The primary outcome measure was citation rate (defined as the number of citations during the 2 subsequent years after publication). Citation data was collected using the SciVerse Scopus® Citation Analyzer and self citations were excluded. A linear regression analysis was performed with ‘number of citations’ as the continuous dependent variable and other independent variables. Result: The number of publications has steadily increased during the period of study. Over three quarter of papers were published in international journals. More than half of publications were research studies (55.3%), and most of the research studies were descriptive cross-sectional studies (27.1%). The mean number of citations within 2 years of publication was 1.7 and 52.1% of papers were not cited within the first two years of publication. The mean number of citations for collaborative studies (2.74) was significantly higher than that of non-collaborative studies (0.66). The mean number of citations did not significantly change depending on whether the publication had a positive result (2.08) or not (2.92) and was also not influenced by the presence (2.30) or absence (1.99) of the main study conclusion in the title of the article. In the linear regression model, the journal rank, number of authors, conducting the study abroad, being a research study or systematic review/meta-analysis and having regional and/or international collaboration all significantly increased the number of citations. Conclusion: The journal rank, number of authors, conducting the study abroad, being a research study or systematic review/meta-analysis and having regional and/or international collaboration all significantly increased the number of citations. However, the presence of a positive result in the study did not influence the citation rate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/2193-1801-3-140

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several characteristics of a document's title and abstract may be less or more attractive for different readers.

    “Several studies have indicated that some characteristics of a document's title and abstract might be less or more attractive for different readers.”
  • Journals with international audiences, journals in fast-developing areas such as genetics, biochemistry, and molecular biology, as well as English language and interdisciplinary journals are more likely to be read and cited.

    “Journals with international audiences (Annalingam et al., 2014), journals in fast-developing areas, such as genetics, biochemistry, and molecular biology (Huang et al., 2012), as well as English language (Bornmann et al., 2012) and interdisciplinary journals (Annalingam et al., 2014) are more likely to be read and cited.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jacques TS Sebire NJ The impact of article titles on citation hits: an analysis of general and specialist medical journals JRSM Short Rep 2010 30 2 10.1258/shorts.2009.100020 21103094 PMC2984326 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Sri Lanka Department of Health Service Annual health bulletin 2002 Colombo Ministry of Health

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Annalingam, A., Damayanthi, H., Jayawardena, R., & Ranasinghe, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Colombo (LK)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Ranasinghe, Priyanga
Venue
SpringerPlus
Published
2014-03-14
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
140-140
ISSN
2193-1801 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134266468
Cited by
64
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • SpringerPlus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
citation counts, medical research publications, number of authors, international cooperation, study abroad, developing countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review