Cited by 201Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

A Meta-Analysis of hope enhancement strategies in clinical and community settings

Open access
Weis, Robert, Speridakos, Elena C·2011·Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice

Abstract

The last two decades have seen the development of theoretical models of hope, which have greatly influenced the field of positive psychology and the study of well-being. Recently, there has been increased interest in using these theories to create interventions and other strategies to enhance hopefulness among clinic-referred individuals and members of the community. We used meta-analysis to determine whether these hope enhancement strategies were associated with (a) increased hopefulness, (b) improved life satisfaction, and (c) decreased psychological distress among participants. Analysis of 27 studies involving 2, 154 participants showed significant, but small, effect sizes for hopefulness and life satisfaction and no overall relationship between hope enhancement strategies and decreased psychological distress. Moderation tests indicated greater effect sizes for studies involving brief interventions, conducted in laboratory settings, and administered to students or individuals recruited from the community. Results also suggested publication bias. As the current study provides only modest evidence for the ability of hope enhancement strategies to increase hopefulness or life satisfaction and no consistent evidence that hope enhancement strategies can alleviate psychological distress., traditional psychotherapeutic interventions or other effective positive psychological constructs (e.g., gratitude, optimism, mindfulness) might best be targeted in applied settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/2211-1522-1-5

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher levels of hope are associated with improved treatment adherence, ability to cope with illness and loss, and enhanced psychological adjustment.

    “It is clinically important as higher levels of hope are associated with improved treatment adherence, ability to cope with illness and loss and also enhanced psychological adjustment (Snyder, 2002;Van Servellen, Chang, Garcia, & Lombardi, 2002;Weis & Speridakos, 2011).”

    From Brief group‐based acceptance and commitment therapy for stroke survivors. (2019) · cites this paper as Weis & Speridakos, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weis, R., & Speridakos, E. C.
Affiliations
Denison University (US)
Corresponding author
Weis, Robert
Venue
Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice
Published
2011
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
5
ISSN
2211-1522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163638869
Cited by
201
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Psychology of Well-Being Theory Research and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
hope, life satisfaction, psychological distress, positive psychology interventions, brief intervention, community-based intervention, clinical intervention, publication bias, well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review