The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for persons with mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer's or vascular type: a review
Open accessAbstract
Cognitive impairments, and particularly memory deficits, are a defining feature of the early stages of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. Interventions that target these cognitive deficits and the associated difficulties with activities of daily living are the subject of ever-growing interest. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation are specific forms of non-pharmacological intervention to address cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes. The present review is an abridged version of a Cochrane Review and aims to systematically evaluate the evidence for these forms of intervention in people with mild Alzheimer's disease or vascular dementia. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published in English, comparing cognitive rehabilitation or cognitive training interventions with control conditions and reporting relevant outcomes for the person with dementia or the family caregiver (or both), were considered for inclusion. Eleven RCTs reporting cognitive training interventions were included in the review. A large number of measures were used in the different studies, and meta-analysis could be conducted for several primary and secondary outcomes of interest. Several outcomes were not measured in any of the studies. Overall estimates of the treatment effect were calculated by using a fixed-effects model, and statistical heterogeneity was measured by using a standard chi-squared statistic. One RCT of cognitive rehabilitation was identified, allowing the examination of effect sizes, but no meta-analysis could be conducted. Cognitive training was not associated with positive or negative effects in relation to any of the reported outcomes. The overall quality of the trials was low to moderate. The single RCT of cognitive rehabilitation found promising results in relation to some patient and caregiver outcomes and was generally of high quality. The available evidence regarding cognitive training remains limited, and the quality of the evidence needs to improve. However, there is still no indication of any significant benefits from cognitive training. Trial reports indicate that some gains resulting from intervention may not be captured adequately by available standardized outcome measures. The results of the single RCT of cognitive rehabilitation show promise but are preliminary in nature. Further well-designed studies of cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation are required to provide more definitive evidence. Researchers should describe and classify their interventions appropriately by using the available terminology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McKhann, G. M., Knopman, D. S., Chertkow, H., Hyman, B. T., Jack, C. R., Kawas, C. H., Klunk, W. E., Koroshetz, W. J., Manly, J. J., Mayeux, R., et al. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 · Cited by 18,657
Albert, M. S., DeKosky, S. T., Dickson, D., Dubois, B., Feldman, H. H., Fox, N. C., Gamst, A., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W. J., Petersen, R. C., et al. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008 · Cited by 10,152
Gauthier, S. G., Reisberg, ., Zaudig, M., Petersen, R. C., Ritchie, K. A., Broich, K., Belleville, S., Brodaty, H., Bennett, D. A., Chertkow, H. M., et al. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68542-5 · Cited by 4,094
(2008) · Cited by 3,790
Cognitive Stimulation in Patients with Dementia: Randomized Controlled Trial
Mapelli, D., Rosa, E. D., Nocita, R., & Sava, D. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353457 · Cited by 3,477
Putting brain training to the test
Owen, A. M., Hampshire, A., Grahn, J. A., Stenton, R., Dajani, S., Burns, A. S., Howard, R. J., & Ballard, C. G. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09042 · Cited by 1,056
Diagnosis and Treatment of Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders
Small, G. W. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550160083043 · Cited by 992
Nonpharmacological therapies in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review of efficacy
Olazarán, J., Reisberg, B., Clare, L., Cruz, I., Peña-Casanova, J., del Ser, T., Woods, B., Beck, C., Auer, S., Lai, C., et al. (2010) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000316119 · Cited by 937 · cited 1×
“More recently, Olazarán and colleagues [72] reviewed the general literature on the effi cacy of 26 categories of non-pharmacological interventions for people with dementia.”
BackgroundSelf-citationCognitive stimulation to improve cognitive functioning in people with dementia
Woods, B., Aguirre, E., Spector, A. E., & Orrell, M. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005562.pub2 · Cited by 855
Self-citationClare, L., & Woods, B. T. (2004) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602010443000074 · Cited by 670
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Oliveira, A. M. D., Radanovic, M., Mello, P. C. H. D., Buchain, P. C., Vizzotto, A. D. B., Celestino, D. L., Stella, F., Piersol, C. V., & Forlenza, O. V. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/218980 · Cited by 247
Anderson‐Hanley, C., Barcelos, N. M., Zimmerman, E. A., Gillen, R. W., Dunnam, M., Cohen, B. D., Yerokhin, V., Miller, K. E., Hayes, D. J., Arciero, P. J., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2018.00076 · Cited by 194
Bamidis, P. D., Fissler, P., Papageorgiou, S. G., Zilidou, V. I., Konstantinidis, E. I., Billis, A. S., Romanopoulou, E. D., Karagianni, M. A., Beratis, I., Tsapanou, A., et al. (2015) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2015.00152 · Cited by 196
Anodal tDCS during face-name associations memory training in Alzheimer's patients
Cotelli, M., Manenti, R., Brambilla, M., Petesi, M., Rosini, S., Ferrari, C., Zanetti, O. O., & Miniussi, C. (2014) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00038 · Cited by 182
Computerised cognitive training for preventing dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment
Gates, N. J., Vernooij, R. W. M., Nisio, M. D., Karim, S., March, E. G., Martínez, G., & Rutjes, A. W. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012279.pub2 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Bahar-Fuchs, A., Clare, L., & Woods, B.
- Affiliations
- Bangor University (GB)
- Venue
- Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 35
- ISSN
- 1758-9193 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3979126
- OpenAlex
- W2122696581
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- cognitive training, cognitive rehabilitation, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, mild to moderate dementia, memory impairment, non-pharmacological treatment, caregiver outcomes, activities of daily living, intervention classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
