Cited by 287Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeWorkplace Health and Well-being

Validity of the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire—general health version in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Open access
Zhang, Wei, Bansback, Nick, Boonen, Annelies, Young, Adam, Singh, Amitabh, Anis, Aslam H·2010·Arthritis Research & Therapy

Abstract

Introduction: The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire is a well validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. However, its validation among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has not been well established. The present study's purpose is to evaluate the construct validity of the WPAI-general health version among RA patients and its ability to differentiate between RA patients with varying health status. Methods: Patients who were enrolled in the Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Network cohort and were employed at their most recent follow-up were recruited into this sub-study. A questionnaire battery incorporating the WPAI was administered along with a number of health outcomes including the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire, fatigue and patient assessment of disease activity. The construct validity of the WPAI was tested by the correlations between the WPAI and the health outcomes and other measures of productivity. Student's t tests were used to identify whether the WPAI outcomes differed between the two levels of heath status based on the median of health outcomes. Results: A total of 150 patients completed the WPAI questionnaire. The average age was 52 years old and the disease duration was 37.5 months since the first rheumatology visit. Of the 137 patients who were working for pay, 26 reported missing work in the past week due to their health problem, accounting for 45.5% of their working time (absenteeism). While 123 patients were working, 24% of their work was impaired due to their health problem (presenteeism). In addition, 33% of the patients' regular daily activities (activity impairment) had been prevented due to their health problems. There were moderate correlations between the WPAI absenteeism and function, pain, fatigue, and disease severity (r = 0.34 to 0.39). The WPAI presenteeism and activity impairment were strongly correlated with the health outcomes (0.67 to 0.77). Patients with more severe disease status (for example, low/high functional disability by median) had significantly higher absenteeism (4%/15%), presenteeism (15%/39%), and activity impairment (19%/53%) than those with less severe disease status. Conclusions: The WPAI is a valid questionnaire for assessing impairments in paid work and activities in RA patients and for measuring the relative differences between RA patients with different health status.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/ar3141

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, W., Bansback, N., Boonen, A., Young, A., Singh, A., & Anis, A. H.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • St. Paul's Hospital (CA)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • St Albans City Hospital (GB)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Anis, Aslam H
Venue
Arthritis Research & Therapy
Published
2010-09-22
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
R177-R177
ISSN
1478-6354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980705643
Cited by
287
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Arthritis Research & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • cIRcle (University of British Columbia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Collections
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Canadian Arthritis Network
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment, construct validity, labor productivity, absenteeism, presenteeism, activity impairment, health status, functional disability, fatigue, disease severity
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Activities of Daily Living, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Cross-Sectional Studies, Efficiency, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review