The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TP53mutation status and gene expression profiles are powerful prognostic markers of breast cancer
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Gene expression profiling of breast carcinomas has increased our understanding of the heterogeneous biology of this disease and promises to impact clinical care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of gene expression-based classification along with established prognostic markers and mutation status of the TP53 gene (tumour protein p53) in a group of breast cancer patients with long-term (12 to 16 years) follow-up. Methods: The clinical and histopathological parameters of 200 breast cancer patients were studied for their effects on clinical outcome using univariate/multivariate Cox regression. The prognostic impact of mutations in the TP53 gene, identified using temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis and sequencing, was also evaluated. Eighty of the samples were analyzed for gene expression using 42 K cDNA microarrays and the patients were assigned to five previously defined molecular expression groups. The strength of the gene expression based classification versus standard markers was evaluated by adding this variable to the Cox regression model used to analyze all samples. Results: Both univariate and multivariate analysis showed that TP53 mutation status, tumor size and lymph node status were the strongest predictors of breast cancer survival for the whole group of patients. Analyses of the patients with gene expression data showed that TP53 mutation status, gene expression based classification, tumor size and lymph node status were significant predictors of survival. Breast cancer cases in the 'basal-like' and 'ERBB2+' gene expression subgroups had a very high mortality the first two years, while the 'highly proliferating luminal' cases developed the disease more slowly, showing highest mortality after 5 to 8 years. The TP53 mutation status showed strong association with the 'basal-like' and 'ERBB2+' subgroups, and tumors with mutation had a characteristic gene expression pattern. Conclusion: TP53 mutation status and gene-expression based groups are important survival markers of breast cancer, and these molecular markers may provide prognostic information that complements clinical variables. The study adds experience and knowledge to an ongoing characterization and classification of the disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In breast cancer, different p53 gene signatures were shown to predict prognosis and survival in estrogen receptor‐positive breast cancer [104, 105, 106, 107].”
From The TP53 tumor suppressor gene: From molecular biology to clinical investigations (2025) · cites this paper as [104]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., Hart, A. A. M., Mao, M., Peterse, H. L., van der Kooy, K., Marton, M. J., Witteveen, A. T., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415530a · Cited by 9,536
p53 Mutations in Human Cancers
Hollstein, M., Sidransky, D., Vogelstein, B., & Harris, C. C. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1905840 · Cited by 8,018
Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals
GRAMBSCH, P. M., & THERNEAU, T. M. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.515 · Cited by 5,885
Cited by
TP53 mutations in human cancers: origins, consequences, and clinical use.
Olivier, M., Hollstein, M., & Hainaut, P. (2010) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a001008 · Cited by 2,199
The clonal and mutational evolution spectrum of primary triple-negative breast cancers
Shah, S. P., Roth, A., Goya, R., Oloumi, A., Ha, G., Zhao, Y., Turashvili, G., Ding, J., Tse, K., Haffari, G., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10933 · Cited by 1,967
When mutants gain new powers: News from the mutant p53 field
Brosh, R., & Rotter, V. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2693 · Cited by 1,132
TP53 mutations in human cancers: Functional selection and impact on cancer prognosis and outcomes
Petitjean, A., Achatz, M. I. W., Borresen-Dale, A. L., Hainaut, P., & Olivier, M. (2007) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210302 · Cited by 884
Mutant p53 disrupts mammary tissue architecture via the mevalonate pathway
Freed-Pastor, W. A., Mizuno, H., Zhao, X., Langerød, A., Moon, S.-H., Rodriguez-Barrueco, R., Barsotti, A., Chicas, A., Li, W., Polotskaia, A., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.017 · Cited by 865
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Langerød, A., Zhao, H., Borgan, Ø., Nesland, J. M., Bukholm, I. R., Ikdahl, T., Kåresen, R., Børresen-Dale, A.-L., & Jeffrey, S. S.
- Venue
- Breast Cancer Research
- Published
- 2007-05-15
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- R30-R30
- ISSN
- 1465-5411 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-542X
- OpenAlex
- W2057487057
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TP53mutation status and gene expression profiles are powerful prognostic markers of breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/bcr1675
- The paper
- Langerød, A., Zhao, H., Borgan, Ø., Nesland, J. M., Bukholm, I. R., Ikdahl, T., Kåresen, R., Børresen-Dale, A.-L., & Jeffrey, S. S. (2007). TP53mutation status and gene expression profiles are powerful prognostic markers of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr1675
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.