Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 217

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Circulating tumor cells as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving first-line systemic treatment

Open access
Giuliano, Mario, Giordano, Antonio, Jackson, Summer, Hess, Kenneth R, De Giorgi, Ugo, Mego, Michal, Handy, Beverly C, Ueno, Naoto T, Alvarez, Ricardo H, De Laurentiis, Michelino, De Placido, Sabino, Valero, Vicente, Hortobagyi, Gabriel N, Reuben, James M, Cristofanilli, Massimo·2011·Breast Cancer Research

Abstract

Introduction: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) represent an independent predictor of outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We assessed the prognostic impact of CTCs according to different first-line systemic treatments, and explored their potential predictive value in MBC patients. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 235 newly diagnosed MBC patients, treated at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. All patients had a baseline CTC assessment performed with CellSearch®. Progression-free survival and overall survival were compared with the log-rank test between groups, according to CTC count (< 5 vs. ≥ 5) and type of systemic therapy. We further explored the predictive value of baseline CTCs in patients receiving different treatments. Results: At a median follow-up of 18 months, the CTC count was confirmed to be a robust prognostic marker in the overall population (median progression-free survival 12.0 and 7.0 months for patients with CTC < 5 and ≥ 5, respectively; P < 0.001). Conversely, in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-overexpressed/amplified tumors receiving trastuzumab or lapatinib, the baseline CTC count was not prognostic (median progression-free survival 14.5 months for patients with CTC < 5 and 16.1 months for those with CTC ≥ 5; P = 0.947). Furthermore, in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 normal tumors, a baseline CTC count ≥ 5 identified subjects who derived benefit from more aggressive treatments, including combination chemotherapy and chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Conclusions: This analysis suggests that the prognostic information provided by CTC count may be useful in patient stratifications and therapeutic selection, particularly in the group with positive CTCs, in which various therapeutic choices may procure differential palliative benefit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/bcr2907

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 217

Metadata

Authors
Giuliano, M., Giordano, A., Jackson, S., Hess, K. R., De Giorgi, U., Mego, M., Handy, B. C., Ueno, N. T., Alvarez, R. H., De Laurentiis, M., De Placido, S., Valero, V., Hortobagyi, G. N., Reuben, J. M., & Cristofanilli, M.
Venue
Breast Cancer Research
Published
2011-06-15
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
R67-R67
ISSN
  • 1465-5411 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-542X
OpenAlex
W2156491034
Cited by
217
References
2
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circulating tumor cells as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving first-line systemic treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/bcr2907
The paper
Giuliano, M., Giordano, A., Jackson, S., Hess, K. R., De Giorgi, U., Mego, M., Handy, B. C., Ueno, N. T., Alvarez, R. H., De Laurentiis, M., De Placido, S., Valero, V., Hortobagyi, G. N., Reuben, J. M., & Cristofanilli, M. (2011). Circulating tumor cells as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving first-line systemic treatment. Breast Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2907

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.