The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement of endotoxin activity in critically ill patients using whole blood neutrophil dependent chemiluminescence
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Lipopolysaccharide (endotoxin) from the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria is a potent trigger for the release of host-derived inflammatory mediators. The relationship between endotoxaemia, Gram-negative infection and the clinical syndrome of sepsis has been difficult to establish, in part because of the limitations of available endotoxin assays. METHODS: We performed an observational cohort study in critically ill patients in the medical/surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital. Whole blood endotoxin levels on the day of ICU admission were measured using a novel chemiluminescent assay--the endotoxin activity assay (EAA)--and the chromogenic modification of the limulus amoebocyte lysate (LAL) assay. RESULTS: We studied 74 consecutive admissions. Endotoxin levels were higher in patients with a diagnosis of sepsis (470 +/- 57 pg/ml) than in patients admitted with a diagnosis other than sepsis (157 +/- 140 pg/ml; P < 0.001). Endotoxaemia was significantly associated with Gram-negative infection (P < 0.05); no patient with a Gram-negative infection had an endotoxin level below 50 pg/ml. White blood cell counts of patients with EAA-detected endotoxaemia were significantly higher (15.7 +/- 9.1 x 10(9) cells/l for endotoxaemic patients versus 10.8 +/- 6.2 x 10(9) cells/l for patients without endotoxaemia; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Endotoxaemia is associated with Gram-negative infection from any source, and with a diagnosis of sepsis and leukocytosis. These correlations were not apparent using the LAL method. The EAA may be a useful diagnostic tool for the investigation of invasive Gram-negative infection and incipient sepsis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pathogenetic Mechanisms of Septic Shock
Epstein, F. H., & Parrillo, J. E. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199305203282008 · Cited by 1,548
Opal, S. M., Scannon, P. J., Vincent, J., White, M., Carroll, S. F., Palardy, J. E., Parejo, N. A., Pribble, J. P., & Lemke, J. H. (1999) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/315093 · Cited by 609
Cited by
Guo, S., Al-Sadi, R., Said, H. M., & Ma, T. Y. (2013) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.10.014 · Cited by 719
O’Grady, N. P., Barie, P. S., Bartlett, J. G., Bleck, T., Carroll, K., Kalil, A. C., Linden, P., Maki, D. G., Nierman, D., Pasculle, W., et al. (2008) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e318169eda9 · Cited by 600
Guo, S., Nighot, M., Al-Sadi, R., Alhmoud, T., Nighot, P., & Ma, T. Y. (2015) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1402598 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Marshall, J. C., Walker, P. M., Foster, D. M., Harris, D., Ribeiro, M., Paice, J., Romaschin, A. D., & Derzko, A. N.
- Venue
- Critical Care
- Published
- 2002-05-02
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 342-8
- ISSN
- 1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168997831
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of endotoxin activity in critically ill patients using whole blood neutrophil dependent chemiluminescence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/cc1522
- The paper
- Marshall, J. C., Walker, P. M., Foster, D. M., Harris, D., Ribeiro, M., Paice, J., Romaschin, A. D., & Derzko, A. N. (2002). Measurement of endotoxin activity in critically ill patients using whole blood neutrophil dependent chemiluminescence. Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1522
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.