The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toxicity of polymyxins: a systematic review of the evidence from old and recent studies
Open accessAbstract
Background: The increasing problem of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria causing severe infections and the shortage of new antibiotics to combat them has led to the re-evaluation of polymyxins. These antibiotics were discovered from different species of Bacillus polymyxa in 1947; only two of them, polymyxin B and E (colistin), have been used in clinical practice. Their effectiveness in the treatment of infections due to susceptible Gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii, has not been generally questioned. However, their use was abandoned, except in patients with cystic fibrosis, because of concerns related to toxicity. Methods: We reviewed old and recent evidence regarding polymyxin-induced toxicity by searching Pubmed (from 1950 until May 2005). Results: It was reported in the old literature that the use of polymyxins was associated with considerable toxicity, mainly nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, including neuromuscular blockade. However, recent studies showed that the incidence of nephrotoxicity is less common and severe compared to the old studies. In addition, neurotoxic effects of polymyxins are usually mild and resolve after prompt discontinuation of the antibiotics. Furthermore, cases of neuromuscular blockade and apnea have not been reported in the recent literature. Conclusion: New evidence shows that polymyxins have less toxicity than previously reported. The avoidance of concurrent administration of nephrotoxic and/or neurotoxic drugs, careful dosing, as well as more meticulous management of fluid and electrolyte abnormalities and use of critical care services may be some of the reasons for the discrepancy between data reported in the old and recent literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pseudomonas aeruginosa : new insights into pathogenesis and host defenses
Gellatly, S. L., & Hancock, R. E. W. (2013) · Pathogens and Disease · doi:10.1111/2049-632x.12033 · Cited by 1,295
Polymyxin B for the treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens: a critical review
Zavascki, A. P., Goldani, L. Z., Li, J., & Nation, R. L. (2007) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkm357 · Cited by 834
Munoz-Price, L. S., & Weinstein, R. A. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra070741 · Cited by 772
Pamp, S. J., Gjermansen, M., Johansen, H. K., & Tolker‐Nielsen, T. (2008) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06152.x · Cited by 486
Impact of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection on patient outcomes
Hirsch, E. B., & Tam, V. H. (2010) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1586/erp.10.49 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Falagas, M. E., & Kasiakou, S. K.
- Venue
- Critical Care
- Published
- 2006-02-13
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- R27-R27
- ISSN
- 1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1602597014
- Cited by
- 828
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxicity of polymyxins: a systematic review of the evidence from old and recent studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/cc3995
- The paper
- Falagas, M. E., & Kasiakou, S. K. (2006). Toxicity of polymyxins: a systematic review of the evidence from old and recent studies. Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.