Cited by 285Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsDiabetes Management and ResearchIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

The Impact of Early Hypoglycemia and Blood Glucose Variability on Outcome in Critical Illness

Open access
Bagshaw, Sean M, Bellomo, Rinaldo, Jacka, Michael J, Egi, Moritoki, Hart, Graeme K, George, Carol, the ANZICS CORE Management Committee·2009·Critical Care

Abstract

Introduction: In critical illness, the association of hypoglycemia, blood glucose (BG) variability and outcome are not well understood. We describe the incidence, clinical factors and outcomes associated with an early hypoglycemia and BG variability in critically ill patients. Methods: Retrospective interrogation of prospectively collected data from the Australia New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database on 66184 adult admissions to 24 intensive care units (ICUs) from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2005. Primary exposure was hypoglycemia (BG < 4.5 mmol/L) and BG variability (BG < 4.5 and ≥ 12.0 mmol/L) within 24 hours of admission. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Results: The cumulative incidence of hypoglycemia and BG variability were 13.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 13.5 to 14.0; n = 9122) and 2.9% (95%CI = 2.8 to 3.0, n = 1913), respectively. Several clinical factors were associated with both hypoglycemia and BG variability including: co-morbid disease (P < 0.001), non-elective admissions (P < 0.001), higher illness severity (P < 0.001), and primary septic diagnosis (P < 0.001). Hypoglycemia was associated with greater odds of adjusted ICU (odds ratio (OR) = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.31 to 1.54) and hospital death (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.27 to 1.46). Hypoglycemia severity was associated with 'dose-response' increases in mortality. BG variability was associated with greater odds of adjusted ICU (1.5, 95% CI = 1.4 to 1.6) and hospital (1.4, 95% CI = 1.3 to 1.5) mortality, when compared with either hypoglycemia only or neither. Conclusions: In critically ill patients, both early hypoglycemia and early variability in BG are relatively common, and independently portend an increased risk for mortality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/cc7921

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rate of hypoglycemia in the intensive care setting depends on the definition used, with incidence rates in the first 24 hours of admission ranging from 1.5% (blood glucose <44 mg/dL) to almost 14% (blood glucose <82 mg/dL).

    “The rate of hypoglycemia in the intensive care setting depends on the definition used, with incidence rates in the first 24 h of admission ranging from 1.5% (if hypoglycemia is defined as a blood glucose &lt; 44 mg/dL) to almost 14% (if hypoglycemia is defined as a blood glucose &lt; 82 mg/dL) [22].”

    From Non-Diabetic Hypoglycemia: Evaluation and Management in Adults (2025) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports 13.8% with blood glucose below 4.5 mmol/L (about 81 mg/dL) in the first day of ICU admission, supporting the ‘almost 14%’ endpoint. It reports 1.4%, not 1.5%, below 2.5 mmol/L (about 45 mg/dL, rather than 44 mg/dL), so the lower endpoint does not match exactly. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bagshaw, S. M., Bellomo, R., Jacka, M. J., Egi, M., Hart, G. K., George, C., & the ANZICS CORE Management Committee
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Okayama University Hospital (JP)
  • Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (AU)
Corresponding author
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Venue
Critical Care
Published
2009-06-17
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
R91-R91
ISSN
1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077534740
Cited by
285
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 30
FWCI
18.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
hypoglycemia, blood glucose variability, critical illness, ICU mortality, sepsis, comorbidities, non-elective admission, disease severity, critically ill adults
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Critical Illness, Hospital Mortality, Glucose Metabolism Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review