The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global analysis of patterns of gene expression during Drosophilaembryogenesis
Open accessAbstract
Background: Cell and tissue specific gene expression is a defining feature of embryonic development in multi-cellular organisms. However, the range of gene expression patterns, the extent of the correlation of expression with function, and the classes of genes whose spatial expression are tightly regulated have been unclear due to the lack of an unbiased, genome-wide survey of gene expression patterns. Results: We determined and documented embryonic expression patterns for 6,003 (44%) of the 13,659 protein-coding genes identified in the Drosophila melanogaster genome with over 70,000 images and controlled vocabulary annotations. Individual expression patterns are extraordinarily diverse, but by supplementing qualitative in situ hybridization data with quantitative microarray time-course data using a hybrid clustering strategy, we identify groups of genes with similar expression. Of 4,496 genes with detectable expression in the embryo, 2,549 (57%) fall into 10 clusters representing broad expression patterns. The remaining 1,947 (43%) genes fall into 29 clusters representing restricted expression, 20% patterned as early as blastoderm, with the majority restricted to differentiated cell types, such as epithelia, nervous system, or muscle. We investigate the relationship between expression clusters and known molecular and cellular-physiological functions. Conclusion: Nearly 60% of the genes with detectable expression exhibit broad patterns reflecting quantitative rather than qualitative differences between tissues. The other 40% show tissue-restricted expression; the expression patterns of over 1,500 of these genes are documented here for the first time. Within each of these categories, we identified clusters of genes associated with particular cellular and developmental functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Self-citationCluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics
Gentleman, R. C., Carey, V. J., Bates, D. M., Bolstad, B., Dettling, M., Dudoit, S., Ellis, B., Gautier, L., Ge, Y., Gentry, J., et al. (2004) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80 · Cited by 12,172
Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms
Bezdek, J. C. (1981) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0450-1 · Cited by 9,881
Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data
Irizarry, R. A. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gng015 · Cited by 4,887
The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt)
Bairoch, A. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki070 · Cited by 3,774
Rab proteins as membrane organizers
Zerial, M., & McBride, H. (2001) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/35052055 · Cited by 3,381
Tautz, D., & Pfeifle, C. (1989) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/bf00291041 · Cited by 2,523
Exploring the new world of the genome with DNA microarrays
Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1999) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/4462 · Cited by 2,414
The embryonic development of Drosophila melanogaster
(1938) · Protoplasma · doi:10.1007/bf01613769 · Cited by 2,142
Cited by
(2008) · doi:10.1038/nrg2290 · Cited by 5,199
Systematic Protein Location Mapping Reveals Five Principal Chromatin Types in Drosophila Cells
Filion, G. J., van Bemmel, J. G., Braunschweig, U., Talhout, W., Kind, J., Ward, L. D., Brugman, W., de Castro, I. J., Kerkhoven, R. M., Bussemaker, H. J., et al. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.009 · Cited by 964
Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome
Mavrich, T. N., Jiang, C., Ioshikhes, I. P., Li, X., Venters, B. J., Zanton, S. J., Tomsho, L. P., Qi, J., Glaser, R. L., Schuster, S. C., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06929 · Cited by 718
A High-Resolution Anatomical Atlas of the Transcriptome in the Mouse Embryo
Diez-Roux, G., Banfi, S., Sultan, M., Geffers, L., Anand, S., Rozado, D., Magen, A., Canidio, E., Pagani, M., Peluso, I., et al. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000582 · Cited by 638
Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase
Ghavi-Helm, Y., Klein, F. A., Pakozdi, T., Ciglar, L., Noordermeer, D., Huber, W., & Furlong, E. E. M. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13417 · Cited by 536
Metadata
- Authors
- Tomancak, P., Berman, B. P., Beaton, A., Weiszmann, R., Kwan, E., Hartenstein, V., Celniker, S. E., & Rubin, G. M.
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2007-07-23
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- R145-R145
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- OpenAlex
- W2116015974
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 11.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global analysis of patterns of gene expression during Drosophilaembryogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r145
- The paper
- Tomancak, P., Berman, B. P., Beaton, A., Weiszmann, R., Kwan, E., Hartenstein, V., Celniker, S. E., & Rubin, G. M. (2007). Global analysis of patterns of gene expression during Drosophilaembryogenesis. Genome Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.