Cited by 112Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenome Rearrangement Algorithms

Quantifying the mechanisms of domain gain in animal proteins

Open access
Buljan, Marija, Frankish, Adam, Bateman, Alex·2010·Genome Biology

Abstract

Background: Protein domains are protein regions that are shared among different proteins and are frequently functionally and structurally independent from the rest of the protein. Novel domain combinations have a major role in evolutionary innovation. However, the relative contributions of the different molecular mechanisms that underlie domain gains in animals are still unknown. By using animal gene phylogenies we were able to identify a set of high confidence domain gain events and by looking at their coding DNA investigate the causative mechanisms. Results: Here we show that the major mechanism for gains of new domains in metazoan proteins is likely to be gene fusion through joining of exons from adjacent genes, possibly mediated by non-allelic homologous recombination. Retroposition and insertion of exons into ancestral introns through intronic recombination are, in contrast to previous expectations, only minor contributors to domain gains and have accounted for less than 1% and 10% of high confidence domain gain events, respectively. Additionally, exonization of previously non-coding regions appears to be an important mechanism for addition of disordered segments to proteins. We observe that gene duplication has preceded domain gain in at least 80% of the gain events. Conclusions: The interplay of gene duplication and domain gain demonstrates an important mechanism for fast neofunctionalization of genes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/gb-2010-11-7-r74

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At the locus level, protein domains often fuse, resulting in novel domains.

    “Even at the locus level, protein domains often fuse, resulting in novel domains (175).”

    From Topological Approaches in Animal Comparative Genomics (2026) · cites this paper as [175]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says that joining exons from adjacent genes creates novel domain combinations in animal proteins. It does not say that protein domains themselves fuse to create new domains; the novelty described is in the combination, not necessarily in the individual domains. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. Marsden RL McGuffin LJ Jones DT Rapid protein domain assignment from amino acid sequence using predicted secondary structure. Protein Sci 2002 11 2814 2824 10.1110/ps.0209902 12441380 PMC2373756 · DOI
  2. Chothia C Gough J Vogel C Teichmann SA Evolution of the protein repertoire. Science 2003 300 1701 1703 10.1126/science.1085371 12805536 · DOI
  3. Babushok DV Ostertag EM Kazazian HH Jr Current topics in genome evolution: molecular mechanisms of new gene formation. Cell Mol Life Sci 2007 64 542 554 10.1007/s00018-006-6453-4 17192808 PMC11138463 · DOI
  4. Peisajovich SG Garbarino JE Wei P Lim AW Rapid diversification of cell signaling phenotypes by modular domain recombination. Science 2010 328 368 372 10.1126/science.1182376 20395511 PMC2975375 · DOI
  5. Pasek S Risler JL Brezellec P Gene fusion/fission is a major contributor to evolution of multi-domain bacterial proteins. Bioinformatics 2006 22 1418 1423 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl135 16601004 · DOI
  6. Enright AJ Iliopoulos I Kyrpides NC Ouzounis CA Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events. Nature 1999 402 86 90 10.1038/47056 10573422 · DOI
  7. Arguello JR Fan C Wang W Long M Origination of chimeric genes through DNA-level recombination. Genome Dyn 2007 3 131 146 full_text 18753789
  8. Long M Betran E Thornton K Wang W The origin of new genes: glimpses from the young and old. Nat Rev Genet 2003 4 865 875 14634634
  9. Babushok DV Ohshima K Ostertag EM Chen X Wang Y Mandal PK Okada N Abrams CS Kazazian HH Jr A novel testis ubiquitin-binding protein gene arose by exon shuffling in hominoids. Genome Res 2007 17 1129 1138 10.1101/gr.6252107 17623810 PMC1933510 · DOI
  10. Zhou Q Zhang G Zhang Y Xu S Zhao R Zhan Z Li X Ding Y Yang S Wang W On the origin of new genes in Drosophila. Genome Res 2008 18 1446 1455 10.1101/gr.076588.108 18550802 PMC2527705 · DOI
  11. Magrangeas F Pitiot G Dubois S Bragado-Nilsson E Cherel M Jobert S Lebeau B Boisteau O Lethe B Mallet J Jacques Y Minvielle S Cotranscription and intergenic splicing of human galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase and interleukin-11 receptor alpha-chain genes generate a fusion mRNA in normal cells. J Biol Chem 1998 273 16005 16010 10.1074/jbc.273.26.16005 9632650 · DOI
  12. Akiva P Toporik A Edelheit S Peretz Y Diber A Shemesh R Novik A Sorek R Transcription-mediated gene fusion in the human genome. Genome Res 2006 16 30 36 10.1101/gr.4137606 16344562 PMC1356126 · DOI
  13. Parra G Reymond A Dabbouseh N Dermitzakis ET Castelo R Thomson TM Antonarakis SE Guigo R Tandem chimerism as a means to increase protein complexity in the human genome. Genome Res 2006 16 37 44 10.1101/gr.4145906 16344564 PMC1356127 · DOI
  14. Thomson TM Lozano JJ Loukili N Carrio R Serras F Cormand B Valeri M Diaz VM Abril J Burset M Merino J Macaya A Corominas M Guigo R Fusion of the human gene for the polyubiquitination coeffector UEV1 with Kua, a newly identified gene. Genome Res 2000 10 1743 1756 10.1101/gr.GR-1405R 11076860 PMC310942 · DOI
  15. Patthy L Exons and protein modules. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
  16. van Rijk A Bloemendal H Molecular mechanisms of exon shuffling: illegitimate recombination. Genetica 2003 118 245 249 10.1023/A:1024138600624 12868613 · DOI
  17. Nurminsky DI Nurminskaya MV De Aguiar D Hartl DL Selective sweep of a newly evolved sperm-specific gene in Drosophila. Nature 1998 396 572 575 10.1038/25126 9859991 · DOI
  18. Zhang XH Chasin LA Comparison of multiple vertebrate genomes reveals the birth and evolution of human exons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006 103 13427 13432 10.1073/pnas.0603042103 16938881 PMC1569180 · DOI
  19. Cordaux R Udit S Batzer MA Feschotte C Birth of a chimeric primate gene by capture of the transposase gene from a mobile element. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006 103 8101 8106 10.1073/pnas.0601161103 16672366 PMC1472436 · DOI
  20. Copley RR Letunic I Bork P Genome and protein evolution in eukaryotes. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2002 6 39 45 10.1016/S1367-5931(01)00278-2 11827821 · DOI
  21. Moore AD Bjorklund AK Ekman D Bornberg-Bauer E Elofsson A Arrangements in the modular evolution of proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 2008 33 444 451 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.05.008 18656364 · DOI
  22. Kaessmann H Zollner S Nekrutenko A Li WH Signatures of domain shuffling in the human genome. Genome Res 2002 12 1642 1650 10.1101/gr.520702 12421750 PMC187552 · DOI
  23. Liu M Grigoriev A Protein domains correlate strongly with exons in multiple eukaryotic genomes - evidence of exon shuffling? Trends Genet 2004 20 399 403 10.1016/j.tig.2004.06.013 15313546 · DOI
  24. Long M Rosenberg C Gilbert W Intron phase correlations and the evolution of the intron/exon structure of genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995 92 12495 12499 10.1073/pnas.92.26.12495 8618928 PMC40384 · DOI
  25. Bjorklund AK Ekman D Light S Frey-Skott J Elofsson A Domain rearrangements in protein evolution. J Mol Biol 2005 353 911 923 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.08.067 16198373 · DOI
  26. Weiner J Beaussart F Bornberg-Bauer E Domain deletions and substitutions in the modular protein evolution. FEBS J 2006 273 2037 2047 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05220.x 16640566 · DOI
  27. Kent WJ Sugnet CW Furey TS Roskin KM Pringle TH Zahler AM Haussler D The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res 2002 12 996 1006 12045153 PMC186604
  28. Altschul SF Gish W Miller W Myers EW Lipman DJ Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990 215 403 410 2231712
  29. Wright PE Dyson HJ Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J Mol Biol 1999 293 321 331 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3110 10550212 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Gsponer J Futschik ME Teichmann SA Babu MM Tight regulation of unstructured proteins: from transcript synthesis to protein degradation. Science 2008 322 1365 1368 10.1126/science.1163581 19039133 PMC2803065 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Gsponer J Babu MM The rules of disorder or why disorder rules. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2009 99 94 103 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2009.03.001 19344736 · DOI
  32. Dosztanyi Z Csizmok V Tompa P Simon I The pairwise energy content estimated from amino acid composition discriminates between folded and intrinsically unstructured proteins. J Mol Biol 2005 347 827 839 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.01.071 15769473 · DOI
  33. Knowles DG McLysaght A Recent de novo origin of human protein-coding genes. Genome Res 2009 19 1752 1759 10.1101/gr.095026.109 19726446 PMC2765279 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Patthy L Genome evolution and the evolution of exon-shuffling - a review. Gene 1999 238 103 114 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00228-0 10570989 · DOI
  35. Liu M Walch H Wu S Grigoriev A Significant expansion of exon-bordering protein domains during animal proteome evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 2005 33 95 105 10.1093/nar/gki152 15640447 PMC546140 · DOI
  36. Ekman D Bjorklund AK Elofsson A Quantification of the elevated rate of domain rearrangements in metazoa. J Mol Biol 2007 372 1337 1348 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.022 17689563 · DOI
  37. Yang S Arguello JR Li X Ding Y Zhou Q Chen Y Zhang Y Zhao R Brunet F Peng L Long M Wang W Repetitive element-mediated recombination as a mechanism for new gene origination in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 2008 4 e3 10.1371/journal.pgen.0040003 18208328 PMC2211543 · DOI
  38. Kim PM Lam HY Urban AE Korbel JO Affourtit J Grubert F Chen X Weissman S Snyder M Gerstein MB Analysis of copy number variants and segmental duplications in the human genome: Evidence for a change in the process of formation in recent evolutionary history. Genome Res 2008 18 1865 1874 10.1101/gr.081422.108 18842824 PMC2593581 · DOI
  39. Bailey JA Gu Z Clark RA Reinert K Samonte RV Schwartz S Adams MD Myers EW Li PW Eichler EE Recent segmental duplications in the human genome. Science 2002 297 1003 1007 10.1126/science.1072047 12169732 · DOI
  40. Bailey JA Eichler EE Primate segmental duplications: crucibles of evolution, diversity and disease. Nat Rev Genet 2006 7 552 564 10.1038/nrg1895 16770338 · DOI
  41. Wilming LG Gilbert JG Howe K Trevanion S Hubbard T Harrow JL The vertebrate genome annotation (Vega) database. Nucleic Acids Res 2008 36 D753 760 10.1093/nar/gkm987 18003653 PMC2238886 · DOI
  42. Freeman JL Perry GH Feuk L Redon R McCarroll SA Altshuler DM Aburatani H Jones KW Tyler-Smith C Hurles ME Carter NP Scherer SW Lee C Copy number variation: new insights in genome diversity. Genome Res 2006 16 949 961 10.1101/gr.3677206 16809666 · DOI
  43. Roth DB Porter TN Wilson JH Mechanisms of nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 1985 5 2599 2607 3016509 PMC366995
  44. Pawson T Nash P Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science 2003 300 445 452 10.1126/science.1083653 12702867 · DOI
  45. Hahn MW Demuth JP Han SG Accelerated rate of gene gain and loss in primates. Genetics 2007 177 1941 1949 10.1534/genetics.107.080077 17947411 PMC2147951 · DOI
  46. Blomme T Vandepoele K De Bodt S Simillion C Maere S Van de Peer Y The gain and loss of genes during 600 million years of vertebrate evolution. Genome Biol 2006 7 R43 10.1186/gb-2006-7-5-r43 16723033 PMC1779523 · DOI
  47. Tzika AC Helaers R Van de Peer Y Milinkovitch MC MANTIS: a phylogenetic framework for multi-species genome comparisons. Bioinformatics 2008 24 151 157 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm567 18025004 · DOI
  48. Milinkovitch MC Helaers R Tzika AC Historical constraints on vertebrate genome evolution. Genome Biol Evol 2009 2 13 18 10.1093/gbe/evp052 20333219 PMC2839353 · DOI
  49. Milinkovitch MC Helaers R Depiereux E Tzika AC Gabaldón T 2 × genomes - depth does matter. Genome Biol 2010 11 R16 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r16 20144222 PMC2872876 · DOI
  50. Kummerfeld SK Teichmann SA Relative rates of gene fusion and fission in multi-domain proteins. Trends Genet 2005 21 25 30 10.1016/j.tig.2004.11.007 15680510 · DOI
  51. Fong JH Geer LY Panchenko AR Bryant SH Modeling the evolution of protein domain architectures using maximum parsimony. J Mol Biol 2007 366 307 315 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.017 17166515 PMC1858635 · DOI
  52. Forslund K Henricson A Hollich V Sonnhammer EL Domain tree-based analysis of protein architecture evolution. Mol Biol Evol 2008 25 254 264 10.1093/molbev/msm254 18025066 · DOI
  53. Buljan M Bateman A The evolution of protein domain families. Biochem Soc Trans 2009 37 751 755 10.1042/BST0370751 19614588 · DOI
  54. Itoh M Nacher JC Kuma K Goto S Kanehisa M Evolutionary history and functional implications of protein domains and their combinations in eukaryotes. Genome Biol 2007 8 R121 10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r121 17588271 PMC2394772 · DOI
  55. Basu MK Carmel L Rogozin IB Koonin EV Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes. Genome Res 2008 18 449 461 10.1101/gr.6943508 18230802 PMC2259109 · DOI
  56. Przytycka T Davis G Song N Durand D Graph theoretical insights into evolution of multidomain proteins. J Comput Biol 2006 13 351 363 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.351 16597245 PMC1815482 · DOI
  57. Stankiewicz P Lupski JR Genome architecture, rearrangements and genomic disorders. Trends Genet 2002 18 74 82 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02592-1 11818139 · DOI
  58. Conrad DF Hurles ME The population genetics of structural variation. Nat Genet 2007 39 S30 36 10.1038/ng2042 17597779 PMC2716079 · DOI
  59. Zhang F Khajavi M Connolly AM Towne CF Batish SD Lupski JR The DNA replication FoSTeS/MMBIR mechanism can generate genomic, genic and exonic complex rearrangements in humans. Nat Genet 2009 41 849 853 10.1038/ng.399 19543269 PMC4461229 · DOI
  60. Gu W Zhang F Lupski JR Mechanisms for human genomic rearrangements. Pathogenetics 2008 1 4 10.1186/1755-8417-1-4 19014668 PMC2583991 · DOI
  61. Dosztanyi Z Chen J Dunker AK Simon I Tompa P Disorder and sequence repeats in hub proteins and their implications for network evolution. J Proteome Res 2006 5 2985 2995 10.1021/pr060171o 17081050 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Dunker AK Obradovic Z The protein trinity - linking function and disorder. Nat Biotechnol 2001 19 805 806 10.1038/nbt0901-805 11533628 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Ryan TJ Emes RD Grant SGN Komiyama NH Evolution of NMDA receptor cytoplasmic interaction domains: implications for organisation of synaptic signalling complexes. BMC Neurosci 2008 9 6 10.1186/1471-2202-9-6 18197970 PMC2257970 · DOI
  64. Han JS Boeke JD LINE-1 retrotransposons: modulators of quantity and quality of mammalian gene expression? Bioessays 2005 27 775 784 10.1002/bies.20257 16015595 · DOI
  65. Dehal P Boore JL Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol 2005 3 e314 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030314 16128622 PMC1197285 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Lynch M Intron evolution as a population-genetic process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002 99 6118 6123 10.1073/pnas.092595699 11983904 PMC122912 · DOI
  67. Sankoff D Cedergren RJ McKay W A strategy for sequence phylogeny research. Nucleic Acids Res 1982 10 421 431 10.1093/nar/10.1.421 6917153 PMC326143 · DOI
  68. Farris JS Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo's Law. Systematic Zool 1977 26 77 88 10.2307/2412867 · DOI
  69. Madera M Profile Comparer: a program for scoring and aligning profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 2008 24 2630 2631 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn504 18845584 PMC2579712 · DOI
  70. Ponting CP The functional repertoires of metazoan genomes. Nat Rev Genet 2008 9 689 698 10.1038/nrg2413 18663365 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buljan, M., Frankish, A., & Bateman, A.
Affiliations
Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Buljan, Marija
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2010-07-15
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
R74-R74
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W1993506738
Cited by
112
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
Keywords
domain combinations, gene fusion, non-allelic homologous recombination, retroposition, exonization, gene duplication, neofunctionalization, evolutionary innovation, gene phylogeny
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Animals, Chromosomes, Exons, Genes, Humans, Introns, Proteins, Recombination, Genetic, RNA, Messenger, Time Factors, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Duplication, Gene Fusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review