The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of genomic high-throughput sequencing data generated on Illumina HiSeq and Genome Analyzer systems
Open accessAbstract
Background: The generation and analysis of high-throughput sequencing data are becoming a major component of many studies in molecular biology and medical research. Illumina's Genome Analyzer (GA) and HiSeq instruments are currently the most widely used sequencing devices. Here, we comprehensively evaluate properties of genomic HiSeq and GAIIx data derived from two plant genomes and one virus, with read lengths of 95 to 150 bases. Results: We provide quantifications and evidence for GC bias, error rates, error sequence context, effects of quality filtering, and the reliability of quality values. By combining different filtering criteria we reduced error rates 7-fold at the expense of discarding 12.5% of alignable bases. While overall error rates are low in HiSeq data we observed regions of accumulated wrong base calls. Only 3% of all error positions accounted for 24.7% of all substitution errors. Analyzing the forward and reverse strands separately revealed error rates of up to 18.7%. Insertions and deletions occurred at very low rates on average but increased to up to 2% in homopolymers. A positive correlation between read coverage and GC content was found depending on the GC content range. Conclusions: The errors and biases we report have implications for the use and the interpretation of Illumina sequencing data. GAIIx and HiSeq data sets show slightly different error profiles. Quality filtering is essential to minimize downstream analysis artifacts. Supporting previous recommendations, the strand-specificity provides a criterion to distinguish sequencing errors from low abundance polymorphisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607
Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2009) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · Cited by 21,849
Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry
Bentley, D. R., Balasubramanian, S., Swerdlow, H. P., Smith, G. P., Milton, J., Brown, C. G., Hall, K. P., Evers, D. J., Barnes, C. L., Bignell, H. R., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07517 · Cited by 3,684
Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data
Nielsen, R., Paul, J. S., Albrechtsen, A., & Song, Y. S. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2986 · Cited by 1,396
SolexaQA: at-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data
Cox, M. P., Peterson, D. A., & Biggs, P. J. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-485 · Cited by 1,357
Tablet-next generation sequence assembly visualization.
Milne, I., Bayer, M., Cardle, L., Shaw, P., Stephen, G., Wright, F., & Marshall, D. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp666 · Cited by 666
Cited by
Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies
Goodwin, S., McPherson, J. D., & McCombie, W. R. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.49 · Cited by 4,352
Illumina error profiles: resolving fine-scale variation in metagenomic sequencing data
Schirmer, M., D’Amore, R., Ijaz, U. Z., Hall, N., & Quince, C. (2016) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-016-0976-y · Cited by 376
Sewage Reflects the Microbiomes of Human Populations
Newton, R. J., McLellan, S. L., Dila, D. K., Vineis, J. H., Morrison, H. G., Eren, A. M., & Sogin, M. L. (2015) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02574-14 · Cited by 299
Genomically encoded analog memory with precise in vivo DNA writing in living cell populations
Farzadfard, F., & Lu, T. K. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1256272 · Cited by 298
A genome-wide analysis of Cas9 binding specificity using ChIP-seq and targeted sequence capture
O'Geen, H., Henry, I. M., Bhakta, M. S., Meckler, J. F., & Segal, D. J. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv137 · Cited by 219
Metabolic independence drives gut microbial colonization and resilience in health and disease
Watson, A. R., Füssel, J., Veseli, I., DeLongchamp, J. Z., Silva, M., Trigodet, F., Lolans, K., Shaiber, A., Fogarty, E., Runde, J. M., et al. (2023) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-023-02924-x · Cited by 92
Phelps, C. M., Willis, N. B., Duan, T., Lee, A. H., Zhang, Y., Rodriguez J, D. M., Pandey, S. P., Laughlin, C. R., Rosen, A. B. I., McPherson, A. C., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.06.018 · Cited by 91
Selfish mutations dysregulating RAS-MAPK signaling are pervasive in aged human testes
Maher, G. J., Ralph, H. K., Ding, Z., Koelling, N., Mlcochova, H., Giannoulatou, E., Dhami, P., Paul, D. S., Stricker, S. H., Beck, S., et al. (2018) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.239186.118 · Cited by 85
Wang, B., Peng, F., Huang, W., Zhou, J., Zhang, N., Sheng, J., Haruehanroengra, P., He, G., & Han, B. (2020) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2019.12.013 · Cited by 73
Luo, T., Srinivasan, U., Ramadugu, K., Shedden, K. A., Neiswanger, K., Trumble, E., Li, J. J., McNeil, D. W., Crout, R. J., Weyant, R. J., et al. (2016) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01132-16 · Cited by 45
Pan-cancer analysis of systematic batch effects on somatic sequence variations
Choi, J.-H., Hong, S.-E., & Woo, H. G. (2017) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1627-7 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Minoche, A. E., Dohm, J. C., & Himmelbauer, H.
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2011-11-08
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- R112-R112
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- OpenAlex
- W2149118757
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 19.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
