Cited by 219CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseCAR-T cell therapy research

A genome-wide analysis of Cas9 binding specificity using ChIP-seq and targeted sequence capture

Open access
O'Geen, Henriette, Henry, Isabelle M., Bhakta, Mital S., Meckler, Joshua F., Segal, David J.·2015·Nucleic Acids Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) RNA-guided nucleases have gathered considerable excitement as a tool for genome engineering. However, questions remain about the specificity of target site recognition. Cleavage specificity is typically evaluated by low throughput assays (T7 endonuclease I assay, target amplification followed by high-throughput sequencing), which are limited to a subset of potential off-target sites. Here, we used ChIP-seq to examine genome-wide CRISPR binding specificity at gRNA-specific and gRNA-independent sites for two guide RNAs. RNA-guided Cas9 binding was highly specific to the target site while off-target binding occurred at much lower intensities. Cas9-bound regions were highly enriched in NGG sites, a sequence required for target site recognition by Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9. To determine the relationship between Cas9 binding and endonuclease activity, we applied targeted sequence capture, which allowed us to survey 1200 genomic loci simultaneously including potential off-target sites identified by ChIP-seq and by computational prediction. A high frequency of indels was observed at both target sites and one off-target site, while no cleavage activity could be detected at other ChIP-bound regions. Our results confirm the high-specificity of CRISPR endonucleases and demonstrate that sequence capture can be used as a high-throughput genome-wide approach to identify off-target activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkv137

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • sgRNA-independent off-target effects also exist, urging unbiased experimental detection and validation.

    “Nevertheless, accumulative studies have proved that sgRNA-independent off-target effects also exist, urging unbiased experimental detection and validation (Richter et al., 2020; O'Geen et al., 2015).”

    From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as O'Geen et al., 2015

    The Results section, “ChIP-seq identifies gRNA-specific and gRNA-independent binding sites” (page unavailable), reports 150 Cas9 binding sites common to two gRNAs. But the Results section on sequence capture reports no significant indel difference between untreated cells and cells given Cas9 with an empty gRNA; it identifies cleavage at only one off-target site. The Introduction and Discussion support broader detection and validation of off-target activity, but the paper does not establish sgRNA-independent off-target cleavage effects. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [41]Hsu P.D. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases Nat. Biotechnol. 2013 31 827 832 23873081 PMC3969858

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Geen, H., Henry, I. M., Bhakta, M. S., Meckler, J. F., & Segal, D. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Segal, David J.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2015-02-20
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
3389-3404
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2150690792
Cited by
219
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • W. M. Keck Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (1c06rr012088-01, 1s10rr012964-01)
  • Office of Science
  • University of California, Davis
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-086350, T32HL086350)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R21HG006761, HG006761)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA0933730)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM097073, R01GM097073)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 026825, RR12964, S10RR026825, RR12088)
  • Biological and Environmental Research
  • Genome Center, University of California, Davis
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, off-target binding, SpCas9, targeted sequence capture, indels, endonuclease activity, genome editing
MeSH terms
RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Cell Line, Streptococcus pyogenes, Mice, INDEL Mutation, Genome-Wide Association Study, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, CRISPR-Associated Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review