Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for the biogenesis of more than 1,000 novel human microRNAs

Open access
Friedländer, Marc R, Lizano, Esther, Houben, Anna JS, Bezdan, Daniela, Báñez-Coronel, Mónica, Kudla, Grzegorz, Mateu-Huertas, Elisabet, Kagerbauer, Birgit, González, Justo, Chen, Kevin C, LeProust, Emily M, Martí, Eulàlia, Estivill, Xavier·2014·Genome Biology

Abstract

Background: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are established regulators of development, cell identity and disease. Although nearly two thousand human miRNA genes are known and new ones are continuously discovered, no attempt has been made to gauge the total miRNA content of the human genome. Results: Employing an innovative computational method on massively pooled small RNA sequencing data, we report 2,469 novel human miRNA candidates of which 1,098 are validated by in-house and published experiments. Almost 300 candidates are robustly expressed in a neuronal cell system and are regulated during differentiation or when biogenesis factors Dicer, Drosha, DGCR8 or Ago2 are silenced. To improve expression profiling, we devised a quantitative miRNA capture system. In a kidney cell system, 400 candidates interact with DGCR8 at transcript positions that suggest miRNA hairpin recognition, and 1,000 of the new miRNA candidates interact with Ago1 or Ago2, indicating that they are directly bound by miRNA effector proteins. From kidney cell CLASH experiments, in which miRNA-target pairs are ligated and sequenced, we observe hundreds of interactions between novel miRNAs and mRNA targets. The novel miRNA candidates are specifically but lowly expressed, raising the possibility that not all may be functional. Interestingly, the majority are evolutionarily young and overrepresented in the human brain. Conclusions: In summary, we present evidence that the complement of human miRNA genes is substantially larger than anticipated, and that more are likely to be discovered in the future as more tissues and experimental conditions are sequenced to greater depth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/gb-2014-15-4-r57

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Friedländer, M. R., Lizano, E., Houben, A. J., Bezdan, D., Báñez-Coronel, M., Kudla, G., Mateu-Huertas, E., Kagerbauer, B., González, J., Chen, K. C., LeProust, E. M., Martí, E., & Estivill, X.
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2014-04-07
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
R57-R57
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2146331115
Cited by
256
References
61
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for the biogenesis of more than 1,000 novel human microRNAs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/gb-2014-15-4-r57
The paper
Friedländer, M. R., Lizano, E., Houben, A. J., Bezdan, D., Báñez-Coronel, M., Kudla, G., Mateu-Huertas, E., Kagerbauer, B., González, J., Chen, K. C., LeProust, E. M., Martí, E., & Estivill, X. (2014). Evidence for the biogenesis of more than 1,000 novel human microRNAs. Genome Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2014-15-4-r57

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.