The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Bayesian taxonomic classification method for 16S rRNA gene sequences with improved species-level accuracy
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Species-level classification for 16S rRNA gene sequences remains a serious challenge for microbiome researchers, because existing taxonomic classification tools for 16S rRNA gene sequences either do not provide species-level classification, or their classification results are unreliable. The unreliable results are due to the limitations in the existing methods which either lack solid probabilistic-based criteria to evaluate the confidence of their taxonomic assignments, or use nucleotide k-mer frequency as the proxy for sequence similarity measurement. RESULTS: We have developed a method that shows significantly improved species-level classification results over existing methods. Our method calculates true sequence similarity between query sequences and database hits using pairwise sequence alignment. Taxonomic classifications are assigned from the species to the phylum levels based on the lowest common ancestors of multiple database hits for each query sequence, and further classification reliabilities are evaluated by bootstrap confidence scores. The novelty of our method is that the contribution of each database hit to the taxonomic assignment of the query sequence is weighted by a Bayesian posterior probability based upon the degree of sequence similarity of the database hit to the query sequence. Our method does not need any training datasets specific for different taxonomic groups. Instead only a reference database is required for aligning to the query sequences, making our method easily applicable for different regions of the 16S rRNA gene or other phylogenetic marker genes. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable species-level classification for 16S rRNA or other phylogenetic marker genes is critical for microbiome research. Our software shows significantly higher classification accuracy than the existing tools and we provide probabilistic-based confidence scores to evaluate the reliability of our taxonomic classification assignments based on multiple database matches to query sequences. Despite its higher computational costs, our method is still suitable for analyzing large-scale microbiome datasets for practical purposes. Furthermore, our method can be applied for taxonomic classification of any phylogenetic marker gene sequences. Our software, called BLCA, is freely available at https://github.com/qunfengdong/BLCA .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB
DeSantis, T. Z., Hugenholtz, P., Larsen, N., Rojas, M., Brodie, E. L., Keller, K., Huber, T., Dalevi, D., Hu, P., & Andersen, G. L. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.03006-05 · Cited by 10,891
Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation
Powers, D. M. W. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.16061 · Cited by 5,440
Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments
Wood, D. E., & Salzberg, S. L. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46 · Cited by 4,521
Quail, M., Smith, M. E., Coupland, P., Otto, T. D., Harris, S. R., Connor, T. R., Bertoni, A., Swerdlow, H. P., & Gu, Y. (2012) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-341 · Cited by 2,031 · cited 1×
“The 1% mutation rate is based on the reported upper range of the Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform [14].”
Background
Cited by
Accuracy of taxonomy prediction for 16S rRNA and fungal ITS sequences
Edgar, R. C. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.4652 · Cited by 319
The bacterial communities of the small intestine and stool in children with short bowel syndrome
Zeichner, S. L., Mongodin, E. F., Hittle, L., Huang, S.-H., & Torres, C. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215351 · Cited by 31
Samarra, A., Cabrera-Rubio, R., Martínez-Costa, C., & Collado, M. C. (2024) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2024.2357176 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, X., Lin, H., Revanna, K., & Dong, Q.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2017-05-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 247-247
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2612975255
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Bayesian taxonomic classification method for 16S rRNA gene sequences with improved species-level accuracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12859-017-1670-4
- The paper
- Gao, X., Lin, H., Revanna, K., & Dong, Q. (2017). A Bayesian taxonomic classification method for 16S rRNA gene sequences with improved species-level accuracy. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1670-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.