Cited by 26Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksStatistical Methods and InferenceMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Multiset sparse partial least squares path modeling for high dimensional omics data analysis

Open access
Csala, Attila, Zwinderman, Aeilko H., Hof, Michel H.·2020·BMC Bioinformatics

Abstract

Background: Recent technological developments have enabled the measurement of a plethora of biomolecular data from various omics domains, and research is ongoing on statistical methods to leverage these omics data to better model and understand biological pathways and genetic architectures of complex phenotypes. Current reviews report that the simultaneous analysis of multiple (i.e. three or more) high dimensional omics data sources is still challenging and suitable statistical methods are unavailable. Often mentioned challenges are the lack of accounting for the hierarchical structure between omics domains and the difficulty of interpretation of genomewide results. This study is motivated to address these challenges. We propose multiset sparse Partial Least Squares path modeling (msPLS), a generalized penalized form of Partial Least Squares path modeling, for the simultaneous modeling of biological pathways across multiple omics domains. msPLS simultaneously models the effect of multiple molecular markers, from multiple omics domains, on the variation of multiple phenotypic variables, while accounting for the relationships between data sources, and provides sparse results. The sparsity in the model helps to provide interpretable results from analyses of hundreds of thousands of biomolecular variables. Results: With simulation studies, we quantified the ability of msPLS to discover associated variables among high dimensional data sources. Furthermore, we analysed high dimensional omics datasets to explore biological pathways associated with Marfan syndrome and with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia. Additionally, we compared the results of msPLS to the results of Multi-Omics Factor Analysis (MOFA), which is an alternative method to analyse this type of data. Conclusions: msPLS is an multiset multivariate method for the integrative analysis of multiple high dimensional omics data sources. It accounts for the relationship between multiple high dimensional data sources while it provides interpretable results through its sparse solutions. The biomarkers found by msPLS in the omics datasets can be interpreted in terms of biological pathways associated with the pathophysiology of Marfan syndrome and of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia. Additionally, msPLS outperforms MOFA in terms of variation explained in the chronic lymphocytic leukaemia dataset while it identifies the two most important clinical markers for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Availability: http://uva.csala.me/mspls . https://github.com/acsala/2018_msPLS

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12859-019-3286-3

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shallow learning methods including jNMF, PLS, CCA, and MKL have been developed for multimodal representation learning.

    “In the early stages of multimodal representation learning, numerous shallow learning methods were developed and utilized. Notable approaches include joint non-negative matrix factorization (jNMF) methods [42], partial least square (PLS) [43], canonical correlation analysis (CCA) [44], and multiple kernel learning (MKL) [45].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Crick F Central Dogma of Molecular Biology Nature 1970 227 5258 561 3 10.1038/227561a0 4913914 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Csala, A., Zwinderman, A. H., & Hof, M. H.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Csala, Attila
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2020-01-09
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
9-9
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998864410
Cited by
26
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
multi-omics integration, high-dimensional data, biological pathway modeling, sparse regression, Marfan syndrome, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, multivariate analysis
MeSH terms
Humans, Marfan Syndrome, User-Computer Interface, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Multivariate Analysis, Least-Squares Analysis, Genomics, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review