The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combining genetic algorithm with machine learning strategies for designing potent antimicrobial peptides
Abstract
Background: Current methods in machine learning provide approaches for solving challenging, multiple constraint design problems. While deep learning and related neural networking methods have state-of-the-art performance, their vulnerability in decision making processes leading to irrational outcomes is a major concern for their implementation. With the rising antibiotic resistance, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have increasingly gained attention as novel therapeutic agents. This challenging design problem requires peptides which meet the multiple constraints of limiting drug-resistance in bacteria, preventing secondary infections from imbalanced microbial flora, and avoiding immune system suppression. AMPs offer a promising, bioinspired design space to targeting antimicrobial activity, but their versatility also requires the curated selection from a combinatorial sequence space. This space is too large for brute-force methods or currently known rational design approaches outside of machine learning. While there has been progress in using the design space to more effectively target AMP activity, a widely applicable approach has been elusive. The lack of transparency in machine learning has limited the advancement of scientific knowledge of how AMPs are related among each other, and the lack of general applicability for fully rational approaches has limited a broader understanding of the design space. Methods: Here we combined an evolutionary method with rough set theory, a transparent machine learning approach, for designing antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). Our method achieves the customization of AMPs using supervised learning boundaries. Our system employs in vitro bacterial assays to measure fitness, codon-representation of peptides to gain flexibility of sequence selection in DNA-space with a genetic algorithm and machine learning to further accelerate the process. Results: We use supervised machine learning and a genetic algorithm to find a peptide active against S. epidermidis, a common bacterial strain for implant infections, with an improved aggregation propensity average for an improved ease of synthesis. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that AMP design can be customized to maintain activity and simplify production. To our knowledge, this is the first time when codon-based genetic algorithms combined with rough set theory methods is used for computational search on peptide sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge
Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A., Hubert, T., Baker, L., Lai, M., Bolton, A., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24270 · Cited by 9,084
Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcasting
Shi, X., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Yeung, D.-Y., Wong, W.-K., & Woo, W.-C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.04214 · Cited by 7,709
Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking 1 1Edited by F. E. Cohen
Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R., & Taylor, R. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897 · Cited by 6,763
Central Dogma of Molecular Biology
CRICK, F. (1970) · Nature · doi:10.1038/227561a0 · Cited by 3,444
Antibiotic resistance is ancient
D’Costa, V. M., King, C. E., Kalan, L., Morar, M., Sung, W. W. L., Schwarz, C., Froese, D., Zazula, G., Calmels, F., Debruyne, R., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10388 · Cited by 2,720
Violin Plots: A Box Plot-Density Trace Synergism
Hintze, J. L., & Nelson, R. D. (1998) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1998.10480559 · Cited by 1,802
Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model
Wang, S., Sun, S., Li, Z., Zhang, R., & Xu, J. (2017) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005324 · Cited by 931
Why deep-learning AIs are so easy to fool
Heaven, D. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-019-03013-5 · Cited by 342
Recurrent Neural Network Model for Constructive Peptide Design
Müller, A. T., Hiss, J. A., & Schneider, G. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00414 · Cited by 270
Research works printed but not linked: 66
- Liu Z, Luo P, Wang X, Tang X. Deep learning face attributes in the wild. In: Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis: 2015. 3730–3738. · DOI · Paper page
- Xu J. Distance-based protein folding powered by deep learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116:16856–65. · DOI · Paper page
- Spanig S, Heider D. Encodings and models for antimicrobial peptide classification for multi-resistant pathogens. BioData Min. 2019;12:7. · DOI
- Abbas Z, Burney A. A survey of software packages used for rough set analysis. J Comput Commun. 2016;4:10. · doi:10.4236/jcc.2016.49002
- Clark PG, Grzymala-Busse JW, Rzasa W. A comparison of two MLEM2 rule induction algorithms extended to probabilistic approximations. J Intell Inf Syst. 2016;47:515–29. · doi:10.1007/s10844-015-0385-0
- Al-Tawfiq JA, Laxminarayan R, Mendelson M. How should we respond to the emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in humans and animals? Int J Infect Dis. 2017;54:77–84. · DOI
- Liu YY, Wang Y, Walsh TR, Yi LX, Zhang R, Spencer J, Doi Y, Tian G, Dong B, Huang X, et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:161–8. · DOI · Paper page
- Strzepa A, Lobo FM, Majewska-Szczepanik M, Szczepanik M. Antibiotics and autoimmune and allergy diseases: causative factor or treatment? Int Immunopharmacol. 2018;65:328–41. · DOI
- Shelomi M, Jacobs C, Vilcinskas A, Vogel H. The unique antimicrobial peptide repertoire of stick insects. Dev Comp Immunol. 2020;103:103471. · DOI
- Kim CH, Go HJ, Oh HY, Park JB, Lee TK, Seo JK, Elphick MR, Park NG. Identification of a novel antimicrobial peptide from the sea star Patiria pectinifera. Dev Comp Immunol. 2018;86:203–13. · DOI
- Zasloff M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms: my perspective. In: Antimicrobial peptides. Springer; 2019: 3–6. · DOI · Paper page
- Choi H, Rangarajan N, Weisshaar JC. Lights, camera, action! Antimicrobial peptide mechanisms imaged in space and time. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:111–22. · DOI
- Simpson DH, Hapeshi A, Rogers NJ, Brabec V, Clarkson GJ, Fox DJ, Hrabina O, Kay GL, King AK, Malina J, et al. Metallohelices that kill Gram-negative pathogens using intracellular antimicrobial peptide pathways. Chem Sci. 2019;10:9708–20. · DOI
- Yoshida M, Hinkley T, Tsuda S, Abul-Haija YM, McBurney RT, Kulikov V, Mathieson JS, Reyes SG, Castro MD, Cronin L. Using evolutionary algorithms and machine learning to explore sequence space for the discovery of antimicrobial peptides. Chem. 2018;4:533–43. · DOI · Paper page
- Bechinger B, Gorr SU. Antimicrobial peptides: mechanisms of action and resistance. J Dent Res. 2017;96:254–60. · DOI · Paper page
- Afshar A, Yuca E, Wisdom C, Alenezi H, Ahmed J, Tamerler C, Edirisinghe M. Next-generation antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) incorporated nanofibre wound dressings. Med Dev Sens. 2021;4:10144. · DOI
- Xie SX, Boone K, VanOosten SK, Yuca E, Song LY, Ge XP, Ye Q, Spencer P, Tamerler C. Peptide mediated antimicrobial dental adhesive system. Appl Sci (Basel). 2019;9:557–75. · DOI
- Yazici H, O’Neil MB, Kacar T, Wilson BR, Oren EE, Sarikaya M, Tamerler C. Engineered chimeric peptides as antimicrobial surface coating agents towards infection-free implants. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:5070–81. · DOI · Paper page
- Wisdom C, VanOosten SK, Boone KW, Khvostenko D, Arnold PM, Snead ML, Tamerler C. Controlling the biomimetic implant interface: Modulating antimicrobial activity by spacer design. J Mol Eng Mater. 2016;4:1640005. · DOI
- Yucesoy DT, Hnilova M, Boone K, Arnold PM, Snead ML, Tamerler C. Chimeric peptides as implant functionalization agents for titanium alloy implants with antimicrobial properties. JOM. 2015;67:754–66. · DOI
- Xie S-X, Song L, Yuca E, Boone K, Sarikaya R, VanOosten SK, Misra A, Ye Q, Spencer P, Tamerler C. Antimicrobial peptide–polymer conjugates for dentistry. ACS Appl Polym Mater. 2020;2:1134–44. · DOI
- Wisdom EC, Zhou Y, Chen C, Tamerler C, Snead ML. Mitigation of peri-implantitis by rational design of bifunctional peptides with antimicrobial properties. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;6:2682–95. · DOI
- Lei J, Sun L, Huang S, Zhu C, Li P, He J, Mackey V, Coy DH, He Q. The antimicrobial peptides and their potential clinical applications. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11:3919.
- Dishman AF, Tyler R, Fox J, Lee M, de Anda J, Lee E, Wong GC, Volkman B. Evolution and functional advantages of protein metamorphosis. Biophys J. 2020;118:24a. · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2019.11.310
- Wang G, Li X, Wang Z. APD3: the antimicrobial peptide database as a tool for research and education. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D1087-1093. · DOI · Paper page
- Fan L, Sun J, Zhou M, Zhou J, Lao X, Zheng H, Xu H. DRAMP: a comprehensive data repository of antimicrobial peptides. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–7. · DOI · Paper page
- Mai S, Mauger MT, Niu LN, Barnes JB, Kao S, Bergeron BE, Ling JQ, Tay FR. Potential applications of antimicrobial peptides and their mimics in combating caries and pulpal infections. Acta Biomater. 2017;49:16–35. · DOI
- Czyzewski AM, Jenssen H, Fjell CD, Waldbrook M, Chongsiriwatana NP, Yuen E, Hancock RE, Barron AE. In Vivo, in vitro, and in silico characterization of peptoids as antimicrobial agents. PLoS One. 2016;11:e 0135961. · DOI
- Rotem S, Mor A. Antimicrobial peptide mimics for improved therapeutic properties. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1788:1582–92. · DOI · Paper page
- Xu L, Shao C, Li G, Shan A, Chou S, Wang J, Ma Q, Dong N. Conversion of broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides into species-specific antimicrobials capable of precisely targeting pathogenic bacteria. Sci Rep. 2020;10:944. · DOI
- Porto WF, Fensterseifer ICM, Ribeiro SM, Franco OL. Joker: An algorithm to insert patterns into sequences for designing antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2018;1862:2043–52. · DOI
- Dua M, Barbará D, Shehu A. Exploring deep neural network architectures: A case study on improving antimicrobial peptide recognition. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference: 2020. 182–191.
- Veltri D, Kamath U, Shehu A. Improving recognition of antimicrobial peptides and target selectivity through machine learning and genetic programming. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2017;14:300–13. · DOI
- Cherkasov A, Hilpert K, Jenssen H, Fjell CD, Waldbrook M, Mullaly SC, Volkmer R, Hancock RE. Use of artificial intelligence in the design of small peptide antibiotics effective against a broad spectrum of highly antibiotic-resistant superbugs. ACS Chem Biol. 2009;4:65–74. · DOI · Paper page
- Boone K, Abedin F, Anwar MR, Camarda KV. Molecular design in the pharmaceutical industries. Comput Aided Chem Eng. 2017;39:221–38. · DOI
- Ng LY, Chong FK, Chemmangattuvalappil NG. Challenges and opportunities in computer-aided molecular design. Comput Chem Eng. 2015;81:115–29. · DOI
- Lin B, Chavali S, Camarda K, Miller DC. Computer-aided molecular design using Tabu search. Comput Chem Eng. 2005;29:337–47. · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2004.10.008
- Fjell CD, Jenssen H, Cheung WA, Hancock RE, Cherkasov A. Optimization of antibacterial peptides by genetic algorithms and cheminformatics. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2011;77:48–56. · DOI
- Veltri D, Kamath U, Shehu A. Deep learning improves antimicrobial peptide recognition. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:2740–7. · DOI · Paper page
- Spänig S, Heider D. Encodings and models for antimicrobial peptide classification for multi-resistant pathogens. BioData Mining. 2019;12:7. · DOI
- Boone K, Camarda K, Spencer P, Tamerler C. Antimicrobial peptide similarity and classification through rough set theory using physicochemical boundaries. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19:1–10. · DOI
- Conchillo-Sole O, de Groot NS, Aviles FX, Vendrell J, Daura X, Ventura S. AGGRESCAN: a server for the prediction and evaluation of “hot spots” of aggregation in polypeptides. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:65. · DOI · Paper page
- Haney EF, Mansour SC, Hancock RE. Antimicrobial peptides: an introduction. In: Antimicrobial peptides. Springer; 2017: 3–22. · DOI · Paper page
- Li Z, Xu X, Meng L, Zhang Q, Cao L, Li W, Wu Y, Cao Z. Hp1404, a new antimicrobial peptide from the scorpion Heterometrus petersii. PLoS One. 2014;9:e 97539. · DOI
- Gertz EM, Yu YK, Agarwala R, Schaffer AA, Altschul SF. Composition-based statistics and translated nucleotide searches: improving the TBLASTN module of BLAST. BMC Biol. 2006;4:41. · DOI · Paper page
- Brand GD, Magalhaes MTQ, Tinoco MLP, Aragao FJL, Nicoli J, Kelly SM, Cooper A, Bloch C. Probing protein sequences as sources for encrypted antimicrobial peptides. Plos One. 2012;7:e45848. · DOI
- Korichi M, Gerbaud V, Floquet P, Meniai AH, Nacef S, Joulia X. Computer aided aroma design I-molecular knowledge framework. Chem Eng Process. 2008;47:1902–11. · doi:10.1016/j.cep.2008.02.008
- Karami Y, Khakzad H, Arab S, Fathy M, Shirazi H. Protein structure prediction using bio-inspired algorithm: a review. In: Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing (AISP), 2012 16th CSI International Symposium on: 2–3 May 2012; 2012. 201–206. · doi:10.1109/aisp.2012.6313744
- Lazar GA, Desjarlais JR, Handel TM. De novo design of the hydrophobic core of ubiquitin. Protein Sci. 1997;6:1167–78. · DOI · Paper page
- Krivov GG, Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL Jr. Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins. 2009;77:778–95. · DOI · Paper page
- Desjarlais JR, Handel TM. De novo design of the hydrophobic cores of proteins. Protein Sci. 1995;4:2006–18. · DOI · Paper page
- Yeh CT, Brunette TJ, Baker D, McIntosh-Smith S, Parmeggiani F. Elfin: An algorithm for the computational design of custom three-dimensional structures from modular repeat protein building blocks. J Struct Biol. 2018;201:100–7. · DOI
- Movahedi M, Zare-Mirakabad F, Arab SS. Evaluating the accuracy of protein design using native secondary sub-structures. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016;17:353. · DOI
- Brunk E, Perez MAS, Athri P, Rothlisberger U. Genetic-algorithm-based optimization of a peptidic scaffold for sequestration and hydration of CO2. ChemPhysChem. 2016;17:3831–5. · DOI
- Opuu V, Silvert M, Simonson T. Computational design of fully overlapping coding schemes for protein pairs and triplets. Sci Rep. 2017;7:15873. · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16221-8
- Lorenzo-Ginori JV, Rodriguez-Fuentes A, Abalo RG, Rodriguez RS. Digital signal processing in the analysis of genomic sequences. Curr Bioinform. 2009;4:28–40. · doi:10.2174/157489309787158134
- Giannerini S, Gonzalez DL, Rosa R. DNA, dichotomic classes and frame synchronization: a quasi-crystal framework. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2012;370:2987–3006.
- Lebre S, Gascuel O. The combinatorics of overlapping genes. J Theor Biol. 2017;415:90–101. · DOI
- Patel S, Stott IP, Bhakoo M, Elliott P. Patenting computer-designed peptides. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1998;12:543–56. · doi:10.1023/a:1008095802767
- Jones DT. De-novo protein design using pairwise potentials and a genetic algorithm. Protein Sci. 1994;3:567–74. · DOI
- Maximova T, Plaku E, Shehu A. Computing transition paths in multiple-basin proteins with a probabilistic roadmap algorithm guided by structure data. In: Proceedings (IEEE Int Conf Bioinformatics Biomed): 9–12 Nov. 2015, 2015; 35–42. · doi:10.1109/bibm.2015.7359652
- Fjell CD, Hiss JA, Hancock RE, Schneider G. Designing antimicrobial peptides: form follows function. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:37–51. · DOI · Paper page
- Pawlak Z. Rough set theory and its applications to data analysis. Cybern Syst. 1998;29:661–88. · DOI
- Kawashima S, Pokarowski P, Pokarowska M, Kolinski A, Katayama T, Kanehisa M. AAindex: amino acid index database, progress report 2008. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D202-205. · DOI · Paper page
- Grzymala-Busse JW, Rzasa W. A local version of the MLEM2 algorithm for rule induction. Fund Inform. 2010;100:99–116.
- Xiao X, Wang P, Lin WZ, Jia JH, Chou KC. iAMP-2L: a two-level multi-label classifier for identifying antimicrobial peptides and their functional types. Anal Biochem. 2013;436:168–77. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs): A promising class of antimicrobial compounds
Erdem Büyükkiraz, M., & Kesmen, Z. (2022) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.15314 · Cited by 454
Discovering highly potent antimicrobial peptides with deep generative model HydrAMP
Szymczak, P., Możejko, M., Grzegorzek, T., Jurczak, R., Bauer, M., Neubauer, D., Sikora, K., Michalski, M., Sroka, J., Setny, P., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36994-z · Cited by 231
Bridging machine learning and peptide design for cancer treatment: a comprehensive review
Rezaee, K., & Eslami, H. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11148-3 · Cited by 34
Pennone, V., Rosini, E., Mascheroni, E., Gianola, S., Castellini, G., Bargeri, S., & Lovati, A. B. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1370826 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Boone, K., Wisdom, C., Camarda, K., Spencer, P., & Tamerler, C.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2021-05-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1471-2105
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 9
- Language
- en
- Licence
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (vor)
- Funders
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE025476)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combining genetic algorithm with machine learning strategies for designing potent antimicrobial peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12859-021-04156-x
- The paper
- Boone, K., Wisdom, C., Camarda, K., Spencer, P., & Tamerler, C. (2021). Combining genetic algorithm with machine learning strategies for designing potent antimicrobial peptides. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04156-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.