Cited by 19Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A-Prot: protein structure modeling using MSA transformer

Open access
Hong, Yiyu, Lee, Juyong, Ko, Junsu·2022·BMC Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: The accuracy of protein 3D structure prediction has been dramatically improved with the help of advances in deep learning. In the recent CASP14, Deepmind demonstrated that their new version of AlphaFold (AF) produces highly accurate 3D models almost close to experimental structures. The success of AF shows that the multiple sequence alignment of a sequence contains rich evolutionary information, leading to accurate 3D models. Despite the success of AF, only the prediction code is open, and training a similar model requires a vast amount of computational resources. Thus, developing a lighter prediction model is still necessary. Results: In this study, we propose a new protein 3D structure modeling method, A-Prot, using MSA Transformer, one of the state-of-the-art protein language models. An MSA feature tensor and row attention maps are extracted and converted into 2D residue-residue distance and dihedral angle predictions for a given MSA. We demonstrated that A-Prot predicts long-range contacts better than the existing methods. Additionally, we modeled the 3D structures of the free modeling and hard template-based modeling targets of CASP14. The assessment shows that the A-Prot models are more accurate than most top server groups of CASP14. Conclusion: These results imply that A-Prot accurately captures the evolutionary and structural information of proteins with relatively low computational cost. Thus, A-Prot can provide a clue for the development of other protein property prediction methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12859-022-04628-8

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Kwon S, Won J, Kryshtafovych A, Seok C. Assessment of protein model structure accuracy estimation in CASP14: old and new challenges. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform. 2021;89:1940–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26192. · DOI
  2. Tillier ERM, Charlebois RL. The human protein coevolution network. Genome Res. 2009;19:1861–71. · DOI
  3. Weigt M, White RA, Szurmant H, Hoch JA, Hwa T. Identification of direct residue contacts in protein–protein interaction by message passing. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106:67–72. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Lunt B, Szurmant H, Procaccini A, Hoch JA, Hwa T, Weigt M. Inference of direct residue contacts in two-component signaling. In: Methods in enzymology. 2010. pp. 17–41. · DOI
  5. Ovchinnikov S, Kamisetty H, Baker D. Robust and accurate prediction of residue-residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information. eLife. 2014;2014:1–21.
  6. de Juan D, Pazos F, Valencia A. Emerging methods in protein co-evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:249–61. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Marks DS, Hopf TA, Sander C. Protein structure prediction from sequence variation. Nat Publ Group. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1038/2419. · DOI
  8. Seemayer S, Gruber M, Söding J. CCMpred: fast and precise prediction of protein residue-residue contacts from correlated mutations. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:3128–30. · DOI
  9. Jones DT, Singh T, Kosciolek T, Tetchner S. MetaPSICOV: combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:999–1006. · DOI
  10. Hopf TA, Schärfe CPI, Rodrigues JPGLM, Green AG, Kohlbacher O, Sander C, et al. Sequence co-evolution gives 3D contacts and structures of protein complexes. eLife. 2014; 3. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Senior AW, Evans R, Jumper J, Kirkpatrick J, Sifre L, Green T, et al. Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning. Nature. 2020;577:706–10. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Xu J, Wang S. Analysis of distance-based protein structure prediction by deep learning in CASP13. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform. 2019;87:1069–81. · DOI
  13. Xu J. Distance-based protein folding powered by deep learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:16856–65. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Strodthoff N, Wagner P, Wenzel M, Samek W. UDSMProt: Universal deep sequence models for protein classification. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:2401–9. · DOI
  15. Vig J, Madani A, Varshney LR, Xiong C, Socher R, Rajani NF. BERTology meets biology: interpreting attention in protein language models. 2020. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Madani A, McCann B, Naik N, Keskar NS, Anand N, Eguchi RR, et al. ProGen: language modeling for protein generation. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.07.982272. · DOI
  17. Kinch LN, Schaeffer RD, Kryshtafovych A, Grishin NV. Target classification in the 14th round of the critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP14). Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform. 2021;89:1618–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26202. · DOI
  18. Kinch LN, Kryshtafovych A, Monastyrskyy B, Grishin NV. CASP13 target classification into tertiary structure prediction categories. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform. 2019;87:1021–36. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Yang J, Anishchenko I, Park H, Peng Z, Ovchinnikov S, Baker D. Improved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2020;117. · DOI
  20. Eddy SR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLOS Comput Biol. 2011;7:1002195. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Steinegger M, Meier M, Mirdita M, Vöhringer H, Haunsberger SJ, Söding J. HH-suite3 for fast remote homology detection and deep protein annotation. BMC Bioinform. 2019; 20. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Mirdita M, von den Driesch L, Galiez C, Martin MJ, Söding J, Steinegger M. Uniclust databases of clustered and deeply annotated protein sequences and alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D170–6. · DOI
  23. Steinegger M, Söding J. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:1026–8. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Lin M, Chen Q, Yan S. Network in network. 2013; arXiv:1312.4400. · arXiv
  25. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Identity mappings in deep residual networks. In: Leibe Bastian and Matas J and SN and WM, editor. Computer vision—ECCV 2016. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 630–45. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Liu L, Jiang H, He P, Chen W, Liu X, Gao J, et al. On the variance of the adaptive learning rate and beyond. In: Eighth international conference on learning representations (ICLR). 2020.
  27. Wu T, Guo Z, Hou J, Cheng J. DeepDist: real-value inter-residue distance prediction with deep residual convolutional network. BMC Bioinform. 2021; 22. · DOI
  28. Zhang C, Zheng W, Mortuza SM, Li Y, Zhang Y. DeepMSA: Constructing deep multiple sequence alignment to improve contact prediction and fold-recognition for distant-homology proteins. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:2105–12. · DOI
  29. Heo L, Janson G, Feig M. Physics-based protein structure refinement in the era of artificial intelligence. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform. 2021;89:1870–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26161. · DOI
  30. Anishchenko I, Baek M, Park H, Hiranuma N, Kim DE, Dauparas J, et al. Protein tertiary structure prediction and refinement using deep learning and Rosetta in CASP14. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform. 2021;89:1722–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26194. · DOI
  31. Zheng W, Li Y, Zhang C, Zhou X, Pearce R, Bell EW, et al. Protein structure prediction using deep learning distance and hydrogen-bonding restraints in CASP14. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform. 2021;89:1734–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26193. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Hong, Y., Lee, J., & Ko, J.
Affiliations
Kangwon National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Juyong
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2022-03-16
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
93-93
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220840971
Cited by
19
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (2018R1C1B600543513, 2019M3E5D4066898)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein structure prediction, multiple sequence alignment, protein language models, template-based modeling, CASP14, AlphaFold
MeSH terms
Models, Molecular, Electric Power Supplies, Proteins, Sequence Alignment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review