Cited by 37Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyProbiotics and Fermented FoodsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Global transcriptional landscape and promoter mapping of the gut commensal Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003

Open access
Bottacini, Francesca, Zomer, Aldert, Milani, Christian, Ferrario, Chiara, Lugli, Gabriele Andrea, Egan, Muireann, Ventura, Marco, van Sinderen, Douwe·2017·BMC Genomics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bifidobacterium breve represents a common member of the infant gut microbiota and its presence in the gut has been associated with host well being. For this reason it is relevant to investigate and understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the establishment, persistence and activities of this gut commensal in the host environment. RESULTS: The assessment of vegetative promoters in the bifidobacterial prototype Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003 was performed employing a combination of RNA tiling array analysis and cDNA sequencing. Canonical -10 (TATAAT) and -35 (TTGACA) sequences were identified upstream of transcribed genes or operons, where deviations from this consensus correspond to transcription level variations. A Random Forest analysis assigned the -10 region of B. breve promoters as the element most impacting on the level of transcription, followed by the spacer length and the 5'-UTR length of transcripts. Furthermore, our transcriptome study also identified rho-independent termination as the most common and effective termination signal of highly and moderately transcribed operons in B. breve. CONCLUSION: The present study allowed us to identify genes and operons that are actively transcribed in this organism during logarithmic growth, and link promoter elements with levels of transcription of essential genes in this organism. As homologs of many of our identified genes are present across the whole genus Bifidobacterium, our dataset constitutes a transcriptomic reference to be used for future investigations of gene expression in members of this genus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12864-017-4387-x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As a qualitative validation step, the matching procedure was applied to B. breve strain UCC2003, confirming that the pipeline correctly identified the expected RPB sequences in the upstream regions of this strain, consistent with previously reported transcriptional data.

    “As a qualitative validation step, the matching procedure was applied to the well-characterized B. breve strain UCC2003 [52] , confirming that the pipeline correctly identified the expected RPB sequences in the upstream regions of this strain, consistent with previously reported transcriptional data.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bottacini, F., Zomer, A., Milani, C., Ferrario, C., Lugli, G. A., Egan, M., Ventura, M., & van Sinderen, D.
Affiliations
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University of Parma (IT)
Venue
BMC Genomics
Published
2017-12
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
991-991
ISSN
1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2778305687
Cited by
37
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Genomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Science Foundation Ireland (07/CE/B1368, SFI/12/RC/2273, 08/SRC/B1393)
  • Federation of European Microbiological Societies (GB) (FEMS-RG-2016-0103)
  • EU Joint Programming Initiative (JPI HDHL)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
promoter mapping, transcriptional landscape, transcriptional regulation, operon transcription, rho-independent termination, logarithmic growth, infant gut microbiota, gut commensals, Bifidobacterium
MeSH terms
Bifidobacterium breve, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Genes, Essential, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, RNA, Small Untranslated, Riboswitch, Transcriptome, Transcription Initiation, Genetic, Transcription Termination, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review