Cited by 47Emergency and Acute Care StudiesTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesHospital Admissions and Outcomes

The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) to predict Emergency Department Disposition: A derivation and internal validation study using retrospective state-wide data from New South Wales, Australia

Open access
Dinh, Michael M., Russell, Saartje Berendsen, Bein, Kendall J., Rogers, Kris, Muscatello, David, Paoloni, Richard, Hayman, Jon, Chalkley, Dane R. +1 more·2016·BMC Emergency Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disposition decisions are critical to the functioning of Emergency Departments. The objectives of the present study were to derive and internally validate a prediction model for inpatient admission from the Emergency Department to assist with triage, patient flow and clinical decision making. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of State-wide Emergency Department data in New South Wales, Australia. Adult patients (age ≥ 16 years) were included if they presented to a Level five or six (tertiary level) Emergency Department in New South Wales, Australia between 2013 and 2014. The outcome of interest was in-patient admission from the Emergency Department. This included all admissions to short stay and medical assessment units and being transferred out to another hospital. Analyses were performed using logistic regression. Discrimination was assessed using area under curve and derived risk scores were plotted to assess calibration. RESULTS: 1,721,294 presentations from twenty three Level five or six hospitals were analysed. Of these 49.38% were male and the mean (sd) age was 49.85 years (22.13). Level 6 hospitals accounted for 47.70% of cases and 40.74% of cases were classified as an in-patient admission based on their mode of separation. The final multivariable model including age, arrival by ambulance, triage category, previous admission and presenting problem had an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.81, 0.82). CONCLUSION: By deriving and internally validating a risk score model to predict the need for in-patient admission based on basic demographic and triage characteristics, patient flow in ED, clinical decision making and overall quality of care may be improved. Further studies are now required to establish clinical effectiveness of this risk score model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12873-016-0111-4

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Logistic regression and Naive Bayes are commonly used, with few studies using more complex algorithms like random-forests, artificial neural networks, and support vector machines.

    “Logistic regression and Naive Bayes are commonly used [9,11,16,18–22], with few studies using more complex algorithms like random-forests, artificial neural networks, and support vector machines [12,15,17].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dinh, M. M., Russell, S. B., Bein, K. J., Rogers, K., Muscatello, D., Paoloni, R., Hayman, J., Chalkley, D. R., & Ivers, R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Dinh, Michael M.
Venue
BMC Emergency Medicine
Published
2016-12
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
46-46
ISSN
1471-227X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2559485670
Cited by
47
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
NSW Ministry of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
emergency department disposition, risk scoring, emergency department triage, patient flow, ambulance arrival, triage categories, previous hospital admissions
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, New South Wales, Patient Admission, Retrospective Studies, Triage, Reproducibility of Results, Logistic Models, Risk Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review