Cited by 53Stress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and BurnoutHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Perceived occupational stressors among emergency medical service providers: a qualitative study

Open access
Afshari, Ali, Borzou, Seyed Reza, Shamsaei, Farshid, Mohammadi, Eesa, Tapak, Leili·2021·BMC Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency medical services (EMS) providers are at continuous exposure to occupational stressors which negatively affect their health and professional practice. This study explored perceived occupational stressors among EMS providers. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted from December 2019 to April 2020 using conventional content analysis. Sixteen EMS providers were purposively selected from EMS stations in Hamadan, Iran. Semi-structured interviews (with length of 45–60 min) were held for data collection. Data were analyzed through Graneheim and Lundman’s conventional content analysis approach. Findings: Data analysis resulted in the development of two themes, namely critical conditions of EMS provision, and personal and professional conflicts. The six categories of these two themes were complexity of patients’ clinical conditions, interruption of EMS provision, health hazards, interpersonal problems, interprofessional interactions, and legal conflicts. Conclusion: Besides the stress associated with emergency patient care, EMS providers face many different occupational stressors. EMS managers can use the findings of the present study to develop strategies for reducing occupational stress among EMS providers and thereby, improve their health and care quality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12873-021-00430-6

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Afshari, A., Borzou, S. R., Shamsaei, F., Mohammadi, E., & Tapak, L.
Affiliations
  • Hamedan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
Corresponding author
Borzou, Seyed Reza
Venue
BMC Emergency Medicine
Published
2021-03-23
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
35-35
ISSN
1471-227X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3136379509
Cited by
53
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
occupational stress, emergency medical services, EMS providers, perceived stressors, health hazards, interpersonal problems, interprofessional interaction, legal dispute, occupational health
MeSH terms
Occupational Stress, Emergencies, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Iran, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review