The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple imputation (MI) is now widely used to handle missing data in longitudinal studies. Several MI techniques have been proposed to impute incomplete longitudinal covariates, including standard fully conditional specification (FCS-Standard) and joint multivariate normal imputation (JM-MVN), which treat repeated measurements as distinct variables, and various extensions based on generalized linear mixed models. Although these MI approaches have been implemented in various software packages, there has not been a comprehensive evaluation of the relative performance of these methods in the context of longitudinal data. METHOD: Using both empirical data and a simulation study based on data from the six waves of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (N = 4661), we investigated the performance of a wide range of MI methods available in standard software packages for investigating the association between child body mass index (BMI) and quality of life using both a linear regression and a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS: In this paper, we have identified and compared 12 different MI methods for imputing missing data in longitudinal studies. Analysis of simulated data under missing at random (MAR) mechanisms showed that the generally available MI methods provided less biased estimates with better coverage for the linear regression model and around half of these methods performed well for the estimation of regression parameters for a linear mixed model with random intercept. With the observed data, we observed an inverse association between child BMI and quality of life, with available data as well as multiple imputation. CONCLUSION: Both FCS-Standard and JM-MVN performed well for the estimation of regression parameters in both analysis models. More complex methods that explicitly reflect the longitudinal structure for these analysis models may only be needed in specific circumstances such as irregularly spaced data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,265
Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey
Cole, T. J. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240 · Cited by 16,480
mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R
Buuren, S. V., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i03 · Cited by 13,870
Sterne, J. A. C., White, I. R., Carlin, J. B., Spratt, M., Royston, P., Kenward, M. G., Wood, A. M., & Carpenter, J. R. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2393 · Cited by 7,299
Self-citation(2001) · Statistics for Psychologists · doi:10.4324/9781410605542-11 · Cited by 6,877
Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data
Schafer, J. L. (1997) · doi:10.1201/9781439821862 · Cited by 6,012 · cited 3×
“commonly assumes that the incomplete variables follow a multivariate normal distribution, often referred to as multivariate normal imputation [12].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAnalysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data
Booth, D. E. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.2000.10486013 · Cited by 5,627
Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (2011) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119513469 · Cited by 4,639
Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification
van Buuren, S. (2007) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280206074463 · Cited by 2,827
A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models
Raghunathan, T. E., Lepkowski, J. M., Hoewyk, J. V., & Solenberger, P. W. (2001) · Survey methodology · Cited by 1,972
Cited by
A survey on missing data in machine learning
Emmanuel, T., Maupong, T., Mpoeleng, D., Semong, T., Mphago, B., & Tabona, O. (2021) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-021-00516-9 · Cited by 1,067
Richards, D., Enrique, A., Eilert, N., Franklin, M., Palacios, J., Duffy, D., Earley, C., Chapman, J., Jell, G., Sollesse, S., et al. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-0293-8 · Cited by 154
Delbaere, K., Valenzuela, T., Lord, S. R., Clemson, L., Zijlstra, G. A. R., Close, J. C. T., Lung, T., Woodbury, A., Chow, J., McInerney, G., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n740 · Cited by 137
de Melo, M. B., Daldegan‐Bueno, D., Menezes Oliveira, M. G., & de Souza, A. L. (2022) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.15858 · Cited by 116
Sachan, S., Almaghrabi, F., Yang, J.-B., & Xu, D.-L. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115597 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Huque, M. H., Carlin, J. B., Simpson, J. A., & Lee, K. J.
- Venue
- BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 168-168
- ISSN
- 1471-2288 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2904561288
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 17.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12874-018-0615-6
- The paper
- Huque, M. H., Carlin, J. B., Simpson, J. A., & Lee, K. J. (2018). A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0615-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
