CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 362Health disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and DisabilityAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review

Open access
O’Rourke, Hannah M., Collins, Laura, Sidani, Souraya·2018·BMC Geriatrics
DOI 10.1186/s12877-018-0897-xPMC PMC6139173

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older adults are at risk for loneliness, and interventions to promote social connectedness are needed to directly address this problem. The nature of interventions aimed to affect the distinct, subjective concepts of loneliness/social connectedness has not been clearly described. The purpose of this review was to map the literature on interventions and strategies to affect loneliness/social connectedness for older adults. METHODS: A comprehensive scoping review was conducted. Six electronic databases were searched from inception in July 2015, resulting in 5530 unique records. Standardized inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied, resulting in a set of 44 studies (reported in 54 articles) for further analysis. Data were extracted to describe the interventions and strategies, and the context of the included studies. Analytic techniques included calculating frequencies, manifest content analysis and meta-summary. RESULTS: Interventions were described or evaluated in 39 studies, and five studies described strategies to affect loneliness/social connectedness of older adults or their caregivers in a qualitative descriptive study. The studies were often conducted in the United States (38.6%) among community dwelling (54.5%), cognitively intact (31.8%), and female-majority (86.4%) samples. Few focused on non-white participants (4.5%). Strategies described most often were engaging in purposeful activity and maintaining contact with one's social network. Of nine intervention types identified, the most frequently described were One-to-One Personal Contact and Group Activity. Authors held divergent views of why the same type of intervention might impact social connectedness, but social contact was the most frequently conceptualized influencing factor targeted, both within and across intervention types. CONCLUSIONS: Research to test the divergent theories of why interventions work is needed to advance understanding of intervention mechanisms. Innovative conceptualizations of intervention targets are needed, such as purposeful activity, that move beyond the current focus on the objective social network as a way to promote social connectedness for older adults.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12877-018-0897-x

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Search results. Results of the search and screening process
Fig. 1 Search results. Results of the search and screening processCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Pan S. Online communities and older adults: the potential of social networks formed in the online community in enhancing social support, social connectedness and subjective well-being among Chinese older adults. Los Angelas: University of Southern California; 2011.
  2. Zelenka A. Modeling social participation as predictive of life satisfaction and social connectedness: scale or index? Denver: University of Denver; 2011.
  3. Marshall G. Predictors associated with late-life depressive symptoms among older black Americans. Washington: University of Washington; 2011.
  4. Cattan M, Ingold K. Implementing change: the alleviation of social isolation and loneliness among older people in Leeds. J Ment Heal Promot. 2003;2:12–9.
  5. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CDR’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: York Publishing Services; 2009.
  6. Schwindenhammer TM. Videoconferencing intervention for depressive symptoms. Normal: Illinois State University; 2014.
  7. Passmore T, Lindenmeier D, Tapps T, Gibson H. Impact of participation in community-based recreation program on reported loneliness and feelings of usefulness of individuals diagnoses with early stage Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Recreat Ther. 2007;6:27–39.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 361

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
O’Rourke, H. M., Collins, L., & Sidani, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Corresponding author
O’Rourke, Hannah M.
ORCID
Venue
BMC Geriatrics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-09-15
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
214-214
ISSN
1471-2318 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s12877-018-0897-x
PMC
PMC6139173
OpenAlex
W2891167182
Cited by
362
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 11
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • BMC Geriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Trainee funding)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
loneliness, social connectedness, older adults, intervention, social contact, group activities, purposeful activity, social networks, caregivers, intervention mechanisms
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Loneliness, Social Behavior, Social Support, Databases, Factual, Caregivers, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review